First, do no harm: A systematic review of deforestation spillovers from protected areas

Land-use restrictions in protected areas (PAs) might have unintended spillover effects on non-target, neighboring areas. In the case of leakage, land-use change that would have occurred in the PA is displaced to an unprotected area where it would not have otherwise occurred. The resultant ‘leakages’...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carley Fuller, Stefania Ondei, Barry W. Brook, Jessie C. Buettel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-04-01
Series:Global Ecology and Conservation
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989419301143
id doaj-eccc181487f74dd1b44508366a30df49
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eccc181487f74dd1b44508366a30df492020-11-25T01:31:31ZengElsevierGlobal Ecology and Conservation2351-98942019-04-0118First, do no harm: A systematic review of deforestation spillovers from protected areasCarley Fuller0Stefania Ondei1Barry W. Brook2Jessie C. Buettel3School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia; Corresponding author.School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, AustraliaSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia; ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage (CABAH), AustraliaSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia; ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage (CABAH), AustraliaLand-use restrictions in protected areas (PAs) might have unintended spillover effects on non-target, neighboring areas. In the case of leakage, land-use change that would have occurred in the PA is displaced to an unprotected area where it would not have otherwise occurred. The resultant ‘leakages’ can offset benefits achieved inside PAs, confound impact assessments, and exacerbate the problems of opportunistic protection of lands. Conversely, in the case of ‘blockage’, the unprotected surroundings experience less land-use change than would have otherwise occurred due to a positive spillover effect from nearby protected areas. Little is known about the magnitude, ubiquity, and predictability of spillovers that have already occurred in the global PA network. Here we systematically review the literature and collate the existing evidence to quantify deforestation spillovers. We calculated deforestation rates within 3,398 PAs, most of which were found in tropical and subtropical moist forests, and in their unprotected adjacent surroundings and compared these rates to a baseline derived from the wider landscape. Of the 2,575 PAs that effectively restricted deforestation rates within their bounds relative to the baseline, 11.8% showed leakage and 54.8% exhibited blockage. Deforestation rates in the remaining 33.4% were indistinguishable from their respective baselines. Linear modelling of the correlates of leakage and blockage showed that PA-specific characteristics like size and IUCN category were uninformative, whereas national-scale socioeconomic factors like population density and GDP were useful predictors. Although spillovers from land-use restrictions are ultimately driven by socioeconomic factors, their ecological consequences are such that PA assessments should routinely and explicitly account for displaced impacts to the unprotected surroundings. Keywords: Spillover, Leakage, Blockage, Protected areas, Impact assessment, Deforestationhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989419301143
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carley Fuller
Stefania Ondei
Barry W. Brook
Jessie C. Buettel
spellingShingle Carley Fuller
Stefania Ondei
Barry W. Brook
Jessie C. Buettel
First, do no harm: A systematic review of deforestation spillovers from protected areas
Global Ecology and Conservation
author_facet Carley Fuller
Stefania Ondei
Barry W. Brook
Jessie C. Buettel
author_sort Carley Fuller
title First, do no harm: A systematic review of deforestation spillovers from protected areas
title_short First, do no harm: A systematic review of deforestation spillovers from protected areas
title_full First, do no harm: A systematic review of deforestation spillovers from protected areas
title_fullStr First, do no harm: A systematic review of deforestation spillovers from protected areas
title_full_unstemmed First, do no harm: A systematic review of deforestation spillovers from protected areas
title_sort first, do no harm: a systematic review of deforestation spillovers from protected areas
publisher Elsevier
series Global Ecology and Conservation
issn 2351-9894
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Land-use restrictions in protected areas (PAs) might have unintended spillover effects on non-target, neighboring areas. In the case of leakage, land-use change that would have occurred in the PA is displaced to an unprotected area where it would not have otherwise occurred. The resultant ‘leakages’ can offset benefits achieved inside PAs, confound impact assessments, and exacerbate the problems of opportunistic protection of lands. Conversely, in the case of ‘blockage’, the unprotected surroundings experience less land-use change than would have otherwise occurred due to a positive spillover effect from nearby protected areas. Little is known about the magnitude, ubiquity, and predictability of spillovers that have already occurred in the global PA network. Here we systematically review the literature and collate the existing evidence to quantify deforestation spillovers. We calculated deforestation rates within 3,398 PAs, most of which were found in tropical and subtropical moist forests, and in their unprotected adjacent surroundings and compared these rates to a baseline derived from the wider landscape. Of the 2,575 PAs that effectively restricted deforestation rates within their bounds relative to the baseline, 11.8% showed leakage and 54.8% exhibited blockage. Deforestation rates in the remaining 33.4% were indistinguishable from their respective baselines. Linear modelling of the correlates of leakage and blockage showed that PA-specific characteristics like size and IUCN category were uninformative, whereas national-scale socioeconomic factors like population density and GDP were useful predictors. Although spillovers from land-use restrictions are ultimately driven by socioeconomic factors, their ecological consequences are such that PA assessments should routinely and explicitly account for displaced impacts to the unprotected surroundings. Keywords: Spillover, Leakage, Blockage, Protected areas, Impact assessment, Deforestation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989419301143
work_keys_str_mv AT carleyfuller firstdonoharmasystematicreviewofdeforestationspilloversfromprotectedareas
AT stefaniaondei firstdonoharmasystematicreviewofdeforestationspilloversfromprotectedareas
AT barrywbrook firstdonoharmasystematicreviewofdeforestationspilloversfromprotectedareas
AT jessiecbuettel firstdonoharmasystematicreviewofdeforestationspilloversfromprotectedareas
_version_ 1725086252579946496