Extending labor epidural analgesia using lidocaine plus either dexmedetomidine or epinephrine for emergency cesarean section

Objective: We designed this study to test whether dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg can be an alternative to epinephrine 5 μg/ml (1/200.000) as an adjuvant to lidocaine 2% for fastening the extension of labor epidural analgesia into an adequate block for emergency cesarean section (CS). Methods: Sixty patient...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Riham Hasanein, Sahar Elshal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2016-07-01
Series:Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110184916300368
id doaj-ecd4de95b2614950ae637588caf771e5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ecd4de95b2614950ae637588caf771e52020-11-25T03:28:30ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEgyptian Journal of Anaesthesia1110-18492016-07-0132335135610.1016/j.egja.2016.05.006Extending labor epidural analgesia using lidocaine plus either dexmedetomidine or epinephrine for emergency cesarean sectionRiham Hasanein0Sahar Elshal1Anesthesia Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, EgyptAnesthesia Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, EgyptObjective: We designed this study to test whether dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg can be an alternative to epinephrine 5 μg/ml (1/200.000) as an adjuvant to lidocaine 2% for fastening the extension of labor epidural analgesia into an adequate block for emergency cesarean section (CS). Methods: Sixty patients having epidural analgesia for normal delivery who required emergency CS were assigned to either lidocaine–epinephrine (LE) group (n = 30) received 19 ml of lidocaine 2% and 1 ml containing 5 μg epinephrine or lidocaine–dexmedetomidine (LD) group (n = 30) received 19 ml of lidocaine 2% and 1 ml containing 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine. If the patient feels any discomfort (VAS >3) during surgery, intravenous fentanyl 25–50 μg was given. Sedation level was assessed using five points numerical scale. Results: Both groups were comparable regarding the onset time and time to maximum block height, p value >0.05. The number of patients required intraoperative fentanyl was higher in LE group compared to LD group, p value <0.05. The mean total fentanyl supplementation was more in LE group compared to LD group, p value <0.001. Overall sedation score was higher in LD group than in LE group (p value <0.001), and more patients had bradycardia in LD group compared to LE group (p value <0.001). The mean time to two segment regression, mean time to regression to Bromage 0 and mean time to first analgesic requirement were significantly longer in LD group compared to LE group, p value <0.001. Conclusion: Epidural dexmedetomidine is comparable to epinephrine as an adjuvant to epidural lidocaine in fastening the onset of surgical anesthesia and resulted in better intraoperative analgesia and in longer duration of sensory and motor block in the settings of converting labor epidural analgesia for emergency CS.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110184916300368Epidural lidocaine–epinephrineEpidural labor analgesiaCesarean sectionEpidural dexmedetomidine
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Riham Hasanein
Sahar Elshal
spellingShingle Riham Hasanein
Sahar Elshal
Extending labor epidural analgesia using lidocaine plus either dexmedetomidine or epinephrine for emergency cesarean section
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Epidural lidocaine–epinephrine
Epidural labor analgesia
Cesarean section
Epidural dexmedetomidine
author_facet Riham Hasanein
Sahar Elshal
author_sort Riham Hasanein
title Extending labor epidural analgesia using lidocaine plus either dexmedetomidine or epinephrine for emergency cesarean section
title_short Extending labor epidural analgesia using lidocaine plus either dexmedetomidine or epinephrine for emergency cesarean section
title_full Extending labor epidural analgesia using lidocaine plus either dexmedetomidine or epinephrine for emergency cesarean section
title_fullStr Extending labor epidural analgesia using lidocaine plus either dexmedetomidine or epinephrine for emergency cesarean section
title_full_unstemmed Extending labor epidural analgesia using lidocaine plus either dexmedetomidine or epinephrine for emergency cesarean section
title_sort extending labor epidural analgesia using lidocaine plus either dexmedetomidine or epinephrine for emergency cesarean section
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
issn 1110-1849
publishDate 2016-07-01
description Objective: We designed this study to test whether dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg can be an alternative to epinephrine 5 μg/ml (1/200.000) as an adjuvant to lidocaine 2% for fastening the extension of labor epidural analgesia into an adequate block for emergency cesarean section (CS). Methods: Sixty patients having epidural analgesia for normal delivery who required emergency CS were assigned to either lidocaine–epinephrine (LE) group (n = 30) received 19 ml of lidocaine 2% and 1 ml containing 5 μg epinephrine or lidocaine–dexmedetomidine (LD) group (n = 30) received 19 ml of lidocaine 2% and 1 ml containing 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine. If the patient feels any discomfort (VAS >3) during surgery, intravenous fentanyl 25–50 μg was given. Sedation level was assessed using five points numerical scale. Results: Both groups were comparable regarding the onset time and time to maximum block height, p value >0.05. The number of patients required intraoperative fentanyl was higher in LE group compared to LD group, p value <0.05. The mean total fentanyl supplementation was more in LE group compared to LD group, p value <0.001. Overall sedation score was higher in LD group than in LE group (p value <0.001), and more patients had bradycardia in LD group compared to LE group (p value <0.001). The mean time to two segment regression, mean time to regression to Bromage 0 and mean time to first analgesic requirement were significantly longer in LD group compared to LE group, p value <0.001. Conclusion: Epidural dexmedetomidine is comparable to epinephrine as an adjuvant to epidural lidocaine in fastening the onset of surgical anesthesia and resulted in better intraoperative analgesia and in longer duration of sensory and motor block in the settings of converting labor epidural analgesia for emergency CS.
topic Epidural lidocaine–epinephrine
Epidural labor analgesia
Cesarean section
Epidural dexmedetomidine
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110184916300368
work_keys_str_mv AT rihamhasanein extendinglaborepiduralanalgesiausinglidocainepluseitherdexmedetomidineorepinephrineforemergencycesareansection
AT saharelshal extendinglaborepiduralanalgesiausinglidocainepluseitherdexmedetomidineorepinephrineforemergencycesareansection
_version_ 1724583823758327808