PENAFSIRAN TELEOLOGIS/SOSIOLOGIS, PENAFSIRAN PURPOSIVE DAN AHARON BARAK: SUATU REFLEKSI KRITIS

PENAFSIRAN TELEOLOGIS/SOSIOLOGIS, PENAFSIRAN PURPOSIVE DAN AHARON BARAK: SUATU REFLEKSI KRITIS

Teleological interpretation is construed the same as sociological interpretatio, because it cores on the intention and purpose in making a rule. Such interpretation is also known as purposive interpretation. However, unlike the teleological and purposive interpretations known in the continental and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: E. Fernando M. Manullang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Parahyangan Catholic University 2019-12-01
Series:Veritas et Justitia
Online Access:http://journal.unpar.ac.id/index.php/veritas/article/view/3495
id doaj-ed1f80abdc7d4256a4384003ee50fd0d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ed1f80abdc7d4256a4384003ee50fd0d2020-11-25T02:07:55ZengParahyangan Catholic UniversityVeritas et Justitia2460-05552460-44882019-12-015226228510.25123/vej.34952843PENAFSIRAN TELEOLOGIS/SOSIOLOGIS, PENAFSIRAN PURPOSIVE DAN AHARON BARAK: SUATU REFLEKSI KRITISE. Fernando M. Manullang0Fakultas Hukum Universitas IndonesiaTeleological interpretation is construed the same as sociological interpretatio, because it cores on the intention and purpose in making a rule. Such interpretation is also known as purposive interpretation. However, unlike the teleological and purposive interpretations known in the continental and common law legal traditions, Aharon Barak proposed his version of purposive interpretation. This article seeks to explain as simple as possible what teleological interpretation, sociological interpretation, purposive interpretation within the common law tradition and purposive interpretation according to Aharon Barak.http://journal.unpar.ac.id/index.php/veritas/article/view/3495
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author E. Fernando M. Manullang
spellingShingle E. Fernando M. Manullang
PENAFSIRAN TELEOLOGIS/SOSIOLOGIS, PENAFSIRAN PURPOSIVE DAN AHARON BARAK: SUATU REFLEKSI KRITIS
Veritas et Justitia
author_facet E. Fernando M. Manullang
author_sort E. Fernando M. Manullang
title PENAFSIRAN TELEOLOGIS/SOSIOLOGIS, PENAFSIRAN PURPOSIVE DAN AHARON BARAK: SUATU REFLEKSI KRITIS
title_short PENAFSIRAN TELEOLOGIS/SOSIOLOGIS, PENAFSIRAN PURPOSIVE DAN AHARON BARAK: SUATU REFLEKSI KRITIS
title_full PENAFSIRAN TELEOLOGIS/SOSIOLOGIS, PENAFSIRAN PURPOSIVE DAN AHARON BARAK: SUATU REFLEKSI KRITIS
title_fullStr PENAFSIRAN TELEOLOGIS/SOSIOLOGIS, PENAFSIRAN PURPOSIVE DAN AHARON BARAK: SUATU REFLEKSI KRITIS
title_full_unstemmed PENAFSIRAN TELEOLOGIS/SOSIOLOGIS, PENAFSIRAN PURPOSIVE DAN AHARON BARAK: SUATU REFLEKSI KRITIS
title_sort penafsiran teleologis/sosiologis, penafsiran purposive dan aharon barak: suatu refleksi kritis
publisher Parahyangan Catholic University
series Veritas et Justitia
issn 2460-0555
2460-4488
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Teleological interpretation is construed the same as sociological interpretatio, because it cores on the intention and purpose in making a rule. Such interpretation is also known as purposive interpretation. However, unlike the teleological and purposive interpretations known in the continental and common law legal traditions, Aharon Barak proposed his version of purposive interpretation. This article seeks to explain as simple as possible what teleological interpretation, sociological interpretation, purposive interpretation within the common law tradition and purposive interpretation according to Aharon Barak.
url http://journal.unpar.ac.id/index.php/veritas/article/view/3495
work_keys_str_mv AT efernandommanullang penafsiranteleologissosiologispenafsiranpurposivedanaharonbaraksuaturefleksikritis
_version_ 1724928766629642240

Similar Items