Agentivité ou autonomie ? Pour une théorie critique de la vulnérabilité

Academic studies on vulnerability have first focused on the absence of “vulnerability” in contemporary political theory. Then, they focused on its conceptual design and normative implications. More recent studies concentrate on the relations between vulnerability and agency and urge us to question t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marie Garrau
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Genre, Sexualité et Société 2021-07-01
Series:Genre, Sexualité et Société
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/gss/6794
id doaj-ed36b019fe0f4dd7ab5348432f158980
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ed36b019fe0f4dd7ab5348432f1589802021-08-03T07:08:12ZfraGenre, Sexualité et SociétéGenre, Sexualité et Société2104-37362021-07-012510.4000/gss.6794Agentivité ou autonomie ? Pour une théorie critique de la vulnérabilitéMarie GarrauAcademic studies on vulnerability have first focused on the absence of “vulnerability” in contemporary political theory. Then, they focused on its conceptual design and normative implications. More recent studies concentrate on the relations between vulnerability and agency and urge us to question the common identification of vulnerability with passivity. The idea that we should overcome the opposition between vulnerability and agency is very important but may lead to a number of problems. More specifically, it can deprive the category of vulnerability of the critical role it had come to play in philosophy and the social sciences. How then should we conceive the relations between vulnerability and agency? In this text, I try to answer this question by defending two arguments: I first argue that, for both theoretical and political reasons, we should neither oppose nor identify vulnerability and agency. If we are to build a critical conception of vulnerability, we must figure out an alternative to these undesirable options. Second, I argue that such an alternative can be found in tying together the concepts of vulnerability and agency with a third concept, namely relational autonomy.http://journals.openedition.org/gss/6794agencyvulnerabilityrelational autonomygenderoppression
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marie Garrau
spellingShingle Marie Garrau
Agentivité ou autonomie ? Pour une théorie critique de la vulnérabilité
Genre, Sexualité et Société
agency
vulnerability
relational autonomy
gender
oppression
author_facet Marie Garrau
author_sort Marie Garrau
title Agentivité ou autonomie ? Pour une théorie critique de la vulnérabilité
title_short Agentivité ou autonomie ? Pour une théorie critique de la vulnérabilité
title_full Agentivité ou autonomie ? Pour une théorie critique de la vulnérabilité
title_fullStr Agentivité ou autonomie ? Pour une théorie critique de la vulnérabilité
title_full_unstemmed Agentivité ou autonomie ? Pour une théorie critique de la vulnérabilité
title_sort agentivité ou autonomie ? pour une théorie critique de la vulnérabilité
publisher Genre, Sexualité et Société
series Genre, Sexualité et Société
issn 2104-3736
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Academic studies on vulnerability have first focused on the absence of “vulnerability” in contemporary political theory. Then, they focused on its conceptual design and normative implications. More recent studies concentrate on the relations between vulnerability and agency and urge us to question the common identification of vulnerability with passivity. The idea that we should overcome the opposition between vulnerability and agency is very important but may lead to a number of problems. More specifically, it can deprive the category of vulnerability of the critical role it had come to play in philosophy and the social sciences. How then should we conceive the relations between vulnerability and agency? In this text, I try to answer this question by defending two arguments: I first argue that, for both theoretical and political reasons, we should neither oppose nor identify vulnerability and agency. If we are to build a critical conception of vulnerability, we must figure out an alternative to these undesirable options. Second, I argue that such an alternative can be found in tying together the concepts of vulnerability and agency with a third concept, namely relational autonomy.
topic agency
vulnerability
relational autonomy
gender
oppression
url http://journals.openedition.org/gss/6794
work_keys_str_mv AT mariegarrau agentiviteouautonomiepourunetheoriecritiquedelavulnerabilite
_version_ 1721223774754308096