Effectiveness and Timing of Vaccination during School Measles Outbreak

Despite high vaccination coverage in most European countries, large community outbreaks of measles do occur, normally clustered around schools and resulting from suboptimal vaccination coverage. To determine whether or when it is worth implementing outbreak-response vaccination campaigns in schools,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Axel Antonio Bonačić Marinović, Corien Swaan, Ole Wichmann, Jim van Steenbergen, Mirjam Kretzschmar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2012-09-01
Series:Emerging Infectious Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/18/9/11-1578_article
id doaj-ed38a8eb40a44dd3a8ce64ee2294d3a4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ed38a8eb40a44dd3a8ce64ee2294d3a42020-11-25T02:25:50ZengCenters for Disease Control and PreventionEmerging Infectious Diseases1080-60401080-60592012-09-011891405141310.3201/eid1809.111578Effectiveness and Timing of Vaccination during School Measles OutbreakAxel Antonio Bonačić MarinovićCorien SwaanOle WichmannJim van SteenbergenMirjam KretzschmarDespite high vaccination coverage in most European countries, large community outbreaks of measles do occur, normally clustered around schools and resulting from suboptimal vaccination coverage. To determine whether or when it is worth implementing outbreak-response vaccination campaigns in schools, we used stochastic outbreak models to reproduce a public school outbreak in Germany, where no vaccination campaign was implemented. We assumed 2 scenarios covering the baseline vaccination ratio range (91.3%–94.3%) estimated for that school and computed outbreaks assuming various vaccination delays. In one scenario, reacting (i.e., implementing outbreak-response vaccination campaigns) within 12–24 days avoided large outbreaks and reacting within 50 days reduced outbreak size. In the other scenario, reacting within 6–14 days avoided large outbreaks and reacting within 40 days reduced the outbreak size. These are realistic time frames for implementing school outbreak response vaccination campaigns. High baseline vaccination ratios extended the time needed for effective response.https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/18/9/11-1578_articlemeaslesvaccinationoutbreak responseschoolsstochastic modelintervention
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Axel Antonio Bonačić Marinović
Corien Swaan
Ole Wichmann
Jim van Steenbergen
Mirjam Kretzschmar
spellingShingle Axel Antonio Bonačić Marinović
Corien Swaan
Ole Wichmann
Jim van Steenbergen
Mirjam Kretzschmar
Effectiveness and Timing of Vaccination during School Measles Outbreak
Emerging Infectious Diseases
measles
vaccination
outbreak response
schools
stochastic model
intervention
author_facet Axel Antonio Bonačić Marinović
Corien Swaan
Ole Wichmann
Jim van Steenbergen
Mirjam Kretzschmar
author_sort Axel Antonio Bonačić Marinović
title Effectiveness and Timing of Vaccination during School Measles Outbreak
title_short Effectiveness and Timing of Vaccination during School Measles Outbreak
title_full Effectiveness and Timing of Vaccination during School Measles Outbreak
title_fullStr Effectiveness and Timing of Vaccination during School Measles Outbreak
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and Timing of Vaccination during School Measles Outbreak
title_sort effectiveness and timing of vaccination during school measles outbreak
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
series Emerging Infectious Diseases
issn 1080-6040
1080-6059
publishDate 2012-09-01
description Despite high vaccination coverage in most European countries, large community outbreaks of measles do occur, normally clustered around schools and resulting from suboptimal vaccination coverage. To determine whether or when it is worth implementing outbreak-response vaccination campaigns in schools, we used stochastic outbreak models to reproduce a public school outbreak in Germany, where no vaccination campaign was implemented. We assumed 2 scenarios covering the baseline vaccination ratio range (91.3%–94.3%) estimated for that school and computed outbreaks assuming various vaccination delays. In one scenario, reacting (i.e., implementing outbreak-response vaccination campaigns) within 12–24 days avoided large outbreaks and reacting within 50 days reduced outbreak size. In the other scenario, reacting within 6–14 days avoided large outbreaks and reacting within 40 days reduced the outbreak size. These are realistic time frames for implementing school outbreak response vaccination campaigns. High baseline vaccination ratios extended the time needed for effective response.
topic measles
vaccination
outbreak response
schools
stochastic model
intervention
url https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/18/9/11-1578_article
work_keys_str_mv AT axelantoniobonacicmarinovic effectivenessandtimingofvaccinationduringschoolmeaslesoutbreak
AT corienswaan effectivenessandtimingofvaccinationduringschoolmeaslesoutbreak
AT olewichmann effectivenessandtimingofvaccinationduringschoolmeaslesoutbreak
AT jimvansteenbergen effectivenessandtimingofvaccinationduringschoolmeaslesoutbreak
AT mirjamkretzschmar effectivenessandtimingofvaccinationduringschoolmeaslesoutbreak
_version_ 1724849968551821312