Effectiveness and Timing of Vaccination during School Measles Outbreak
Despite high vaccination coverage in most European countries, large community outbreaks of measles do occur, normally clustered around schools and resulting from suboptimal vaccination coverage. To determine whether or when it is worth implementing outbreak-response vaccination campaigns in schools,...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2012-09-01
|
Series: | Emerging Infectious Diseases |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/18/9/11-1578_article |
id |
doaj-ed38a8eb40a44dd3a8ce64ee2294d3a4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ed38a8eb40a44dd3a8ce64ee2294d3a42020-11-25T02:25:50ZengCenters for Disease Control and PreventionEmerging Infectious Diseases1080-60401080-60592012-09-011891405141310.3201/eid1809.111578Effectiveness and Timing of Vaccination during School Measles OutbreakAxel Antonio Bonačić MarinovićCorien SwaanOle WichmannJim van SteenbergenMirjam KretzschmarDespite high vaccination coverage in most European countries, large community outbreaks of measles do occur, normally clustered around schools and resulting from suboptimal vaccination coverage. To determine whether or when it is worth implementing outbreak-response vaccination campaigns in schools, we used stochastic outbreak models to reproduce a public school outbreak in Germany, where no vaccination campaign was implemented. We assumed 2 scenarios covering the baseline vaccination ratio range (91.3%–94.3%) estimated for that school and computed outbreaks assuming various vaccination delays. In one scenario, reacting (i.e., implementing outbreak-response vaccination campaigns) within 12–24 days avoided large outbreaks and reacting within 50 days reduced outbreak size. In the other scenario, reacting within 6–14 days avoided large outbreaks and reacting within 40 days reduced the outbreak size. These are realistic time frames for implementing school outbreak response vaccination campaigns. High baseline vaccination ratios extended the time needed for effective response.https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/18/9/11-1578_articlemeaslesvaccinationoutbreak responseschoolsstochastic modelintervention |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Axel Antonio Bonačić Marinović Corien Swaan Ole Wichmann Jim van Steenbergen Mirjam Kretzschmar |
spellingShingle |
Axel Antonio Bonačić Marinović Corien Swaan Ole Wichmann Jim van Steenbergen Mirjam Kretzschmar Effectiveness and Timing of Vaccination during School Measles Outbreak Emerging Infectious Diseases measles vaccination outbreak response schools stochastic model intervention |
author_facet |
Axel Antonio Bonačić Marinović Corien Swaan Ole Wichmann Jim van Steenbergen Mirjam Kretzschmar |
author_sort |
Axel Antonio Bonačić Marinović |
title |
Effectiveness and Timing of Vaccination during School Measles Outbreak |
title_short |
Effectiveness and Timing of Vaccination during School Measles Outbreak |
title_full |
Effectiveness and Timing of Vaccination during School Measles Outbreak |
title_fullStr |
Effectiveness and Timing of Vaccination during School Measles Outbreak |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effectiveness and Timing of Vaccination during School Measles Outbreak |
title_sort |
effectiveness and timing of vaccination during school measles outbreak |
publisher |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
series |
Emerging Infectious Diseases |
issn |
1080-6040 1080-6059 |
publishDate |
2012-09-01 |
description |
Despite high vaccination coverage in most European countries, large community outbreaks of measles do occur, normally clustered around schools and resulting from suboptimal vaccination coverage. To determine whether or when it is worth implementing outbreak-response vaccination campaigns in schools, we used stochastic outbreak models to reproduce a public school outbreak in Germany, where no vaccination campaign was implemented. We assumed 2 scenarios covering the baseline vaccination ratio range (91.3%–94.3%) estimated for that school and computed outbreaks assuming various vaccination delays. In one scenario, reacting (i.e., implementing outbreak-response vaccination campaigns) within 12–24 days avoided large outbreaks and reacting within 50 days reduced outbreak size. In the other scenario, reacting within 6–14 days avoided large outbreaks and reacting within 40 days reduced the outbreak size. These are realistic time frames for implementing school outbreak response vaccination campaigns. High baseline vaccination ratios extended the time needed for effective response. |
topic |
measles vaccination outbreak response schools stochastic model intervention |
url |
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/18/9/11-1578_article |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT axelantoniobonacicmarinovic effectivenessandtimingofvaccinationduringschoolmeaslesoutbreak AT corienswaan effectivenessandtimingofvaccinationduringschoolmeaslesoutbreak AT olewichmann effectivenessandtimingofvaccinationduringschoolmeaslesoutbreak AT jimvansteenbergen effectivenessandtimingofvaccinationduringschoolmeaslesoutbreak AT mirjamkretzschmar effectivenessandtimingofvaccinationduringschoolmeaslesoutbreak |
_version_ |
1724849968551821312 |