Genomic Sequencing Capacity, Data Retention, and Personal Access to Raw Data in Europe

Whole genome/exome sequencing (WGS/WES) has become widely adopted in research and, more recently, in clinical settings. Many hope that the information obtained from the interpretation of these data will have medical benefits for patients and—in some cases—also their biological relatives. Because of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shaman Narayanasamy, Varvara Markina, Adrian Thorogood, Adriana Blazkova, Mahsa Shabani, Bartha M. Knoppers, Barbara Prainsack, Robert Koesters
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Genetics
Subjects:
NGS
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fgene.2020.00303/full
id doaj-ed411e6569c4482d8dd868c140c8534a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ed411e6569c4482d8dd868c140c8534a2020-11-25T02:04:20ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Genetics1664-80212020-05-011110.3389/fgene.2020.00303515847Genomic Sequencing Capacity, Data Retention, and Personal Access to Raw Data in EuropeShaman Narayanasamy0Varvara Markina1Adrian Thorogood2Adriana Blazkova3Adriana Blazkova4Mahsa Shabani5Bartha M. Knoppers6Barbara Prainsack7Barbara Prainsack8Robert Koesters9Megeno S.A., Esch-sur-Alzette, LuxembourgMegeno S.A., Esch-sur-Alzette, LuxembourgCentre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, CanadaMegeno S.A., Esch-sur-Alzette, LuxembourgFaculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, LuxembourgMetamedica, Faculty of Law and Criminology, Ghent University, Ghent, BelgiumCentre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, CanadaDepartment of Political Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, AustriaDepartment of Global Health & Social Medicine, King’s College London, London, United KingdomMegeno S.A., Esch-sur-Alzette, LuxembourgWhole genome/exome sequencing (WGS/WES) has become widely adopted in research and, more recently, in clinical settings. Many hope that the information obtained from the interpretation of these data will have medical benefits for patients and—in some cases—also their biological relatives. Because of the manifold possibilities to reuse genomic data, enabling sequenced individuals to access their own raw (uninterpreted) genomic data is a highly debated issue. This paper reports some of the first empirical findings on personal genome access policies and practices. We interviewed 39 respondents, working at 33 institutions in 21 countries across Europe. These sequencing institutions generate massive amounts of WGS/WES data and represent varying organisational structures and operational models. Taken together, in total, these institutions have sequenced ∼317,259 genomes and exomes to date. Most of the sequencing institutions reported that they are able to store raw genomic data in compliance with various national regulations, although there was a lack of standardisation of storage formats. Interviewees from 12 of the 33 institutions included in our study reported that they had received requests for personal access to raw genomic data from sequenced individuals. In the absence of policies on how to process such requests, these were decided on an ad hoc basis; in the end, at least 28 requests were granted, while there were no reports of requests being rejected. Given the rights, interests, and liabilities at stake, it is essential that sequencing institutions adopt clear policies and processes for raw genomic data retention and personal access.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fgene.2020.00303/fullNGSELSIpoliciesprocedurespatient rightsresearch participant rights
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shaman Narayanasamy
Varvara Markina
Adrian Thorogood
Adriana Blazkova
Adriana Blazkova
Mahsa Shabani
Bartha M. Knoppers
Barbara Prainsack
Barbara Prainsack
Robert Koesters
spellingShingle Shaman Narayanasamy
Varvara Markina
Adrian Thorogood
Adriana Blazkova
Adriana Blazkova
Mahsa Shabani
Bartha M. Knoppers
Barbara Prainsack
Barbara Prainsack
Robert Koesters
Genomic Sequencing Capacity, Data Retention, and Personal Access to Raw Data in Europe
Frontiers in Genetics
NGS
ELSI
policies
procedures
patient rights
research participant rights
author_facet Shaman Narayanasamy
Varvara Markina
Adrian Thorogood
Adriana Blazkova
Adriana Blazkova
Mahsa Shabani
Bartha M. Knoppers
Barbara Prainsack
Barbara Prainsack
Robert Koesters
author_sort Shaman Narayanasamy
title Genomic Sequencing Capacity, Data Retention, and Personal Access to Raw Data in Europe
title_short Genomic Sequencing Capacity, Data Retention, and Personal Access to Raw Data in Europe
title_full Genomic Sequencing Capacity, Data Retention, and Personal Access to Raw Data in Europe
title_fullStr Genomic Sequencing Capacity, Data Retention, and Personal Access to Raw Data in Europe
title_full_unstemmed Genomic Sequencing Capacity, Data Retention, and Personal Access to Raw Data in Europe
title_sort genomic sequencing capacity, data retention, and personal access to raw data in europe
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Genetics
issn 1664-8021
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Whole genome/exome sequencing (WGS/WES) has become widely adopted in research and, more recently, in clinical settings. Many hope that the information obtained from the interpretation of these data will have medical benefits for patients and—in some cases—also their biological relatives. Because of the manifold possibilities to reuse genomic data, enabling sequenced individuals to access their own raw (uninterpreted) genomic data is a highly debated issue. This paper reports some of the first empirical findings on personal genome access policies and practices. We interviewed 39 respondents, working at 33 institutions in 21 countries across Europe. These sequencing institutions generate massive amounts of WGS/WES data and represent varying organisational structures and operational models. Taken together, in total, these institutions have sequenced ∼317,259 genomes and exomes to date. Most of the sequencing institutions reported that they are able to store raw genomic data in compliance with various national regulations, although there was a lack of standardisation of storage formats. Interviewees from 12 of the 33 institutions included in our study reported that they had received requests for personal access to raw genomic data from sequenced individuals. In the absence of policies on how to process such requests, these were decided on an ad hoc basis; in the end, at least 28 requests were granted, while there were no reports of requests being rejected. Given the rights, interests, and liabilities at stake, it is essential that sequencing institutions adopt clear policies and processes for raw genomic data retention and personal access.
topic NGS
ELSI
policies
procedures
patient rights
research participant rights
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fgene.2020.00303/full
work_keys_str_mv AT shamannarayanasamy genomicsequencingcapacitydataretentionandpersonalaccesstorawdataineurope
AT varvaramarkina genomicsequencingcapacitydataretentionandpersonalaccesstorawdataineurope
AT adrianthorogood genomicsequencingcapacitydataretentionandpersonalaccesstorawdataineurope
AT adrianablazkova genomicsequencingcapacitydataretentionandpersonalaccesstorawdataineurope
AT adrianablazkova genomicsequencingcapacitydataretentionandpersonalaccesstorawdataineurope
AT mahsashabani genomicsequencingcapacitydataretentionandpersonalaccesstorawdataineurope
AT barthamknoppers genomicsequencingcapacitydataretentionandpersonalaccesstorawdataineurope
AT barbaraprainsack genomicsequencingcapacitydataretentionandpersonalaccesstorawdataineurope
AT barbaraprainsack genomicsequencingcapacitydataretentionandpersonalaccesstorawdataineurope
AT robertkoesters genomicsequencingcapacitydataretentionandpersonalaccesstorawdataineurope
_version_ 1724942988527796224