Costing Methodology and Key Drivers of Health Care Costs Within Economic Analyses in Musculoskeletal Community and Primary Care Services: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background: Identifying variation in musculoskeletal service costs requires the use of specific standardized metrics. There has been a large focus on costing, efficiency, and standardized metrics within the acute musculoskeletal setting, but far less attention in primary care and community settings....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roanna Burgess, James Hall, Annette Bishop, Martyn Lewis, Jonathan Hill
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Primary Care & Community Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2150132719899763
id doaj-ed4b2bd01c0f4f72813a5f2078f86864
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ed4b2bd01c0f4f72813a5f2078f868642020-11-25T03:46:11ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Primary Care & Community Health2150-13272020-01-011110.1177/2150132719899763Costing Methodology and Key Drivers of Health Care Costs Within Economic Analyses in Musculoskeletal Community and Primary Care Services: A Systematic Review of the LiteratureRoanna Burgess0James Hall1Annette Bishop2Martyn Lewis3Jonathan Hill4Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UKUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UKKeele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UKKeele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UKKeele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UKBackground: Identifying variation in musculoskeletal service costs requires the use of specific standardized metrics. There has been a large focus on costing, efficiency, and standardized metrics within the acute musculoskeletal setting, but far less attention in primary care and community settings. Objectives: To ( a ) assess the quality of costing methods used within musculoskeletal economic analyses based primarily in primary and community settings and ( b ) identify which cost variables are the key drivers of musculoskeletal health care costs within these settings. Methods: Medline, AMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, HMIC, BNI, and HBE electronic databases were searched for eligible studies. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed quality of costing methods using an established checklist. Results: Twenty-two studies met the review inclusion criteria. The majority of studies demonstrated moderate- to high-quality costing methods. Costing issues included studies failing to fully justify the economic perspective, and not distinguishing between short- and long-run costs. Highest unit costs were hospital admissions, outpatient visits, and imaging. Highest mean utilization were the following: general practitioner (GP) visits, outpatient visits, and physiotherapy visits. Highest mean costs per patient were GP visits, outpatient visits, and physiotherapy visits. Conclusion: This review identified a number of key resource use variables that are driving musculoskeletal health care costs in the community/primary care setting. High utilization of these resources (rather than high unit cost) appears to be the predominant factor increasing mean health care costs. There is, however, need for greater detail with capturing these key cost drivers, to further improve the accuracy of costing information.https://doi.org/10.1177/2150132719899763
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Roanna Burgess
James Hall
Annette Bishop
Martyn Lewis
Jonathan Hill
spellingShingle Roanna Burgess
James Hall
Annette Bishop
Martyn Lewis
Jonathan Hill
Costing Methodology and Key Drivers of Health Care Costs Within Economic Analyses in Musculoskeletal Community and Primary Care Services: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Journal of Primary Care & Community Health
author_facet Roanna Burgess
James Hall
Annette Bishop
Martyn Lewis
Jonathan Hill
author_sort Roanna Burgess
title Costing Methodology and Key Drivers of Health Care Costs Within Economic Analyses in Musculoskeletal Community and Primary Care Services: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_short Costing Methodology and Key Drivers of Health Care Costs Within Economic Analyses in Musculoskeletal Community and Primary Care Services: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_full Costing Methodology and Key Drivers of Health Care Costs Within Economic Analyses in Musculoskeletal Community and Primary Care Services: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_fullStr Costing Methodology and Key Drivers of Health Care Costs Within Economic Analyses in Musculoskeletal Community and Primary Care Services: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed Costing Methodology and Key Drivers of Health Care Costs Within Economic Analyses in Musculoskeletal Community and Primary Care Services: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_sort costing methodology and key drivers of health care costs within economic analyses in musculoskeletal community and primary care services: a systematic review of the literature
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Primary Care & Community Health
issn 2150-1327
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Background: Identifying variation in musculoskeletal service costs requires the use of specific standardized metrics. There has been a large focus on costing, efficiency, and standardized metrics within the acute musculoskeletal setting, but far less attention in primary care and community settings. Objectives: To ( a ) assess the quality of costing methods used within musculoskeletal economic analyses based primarily in primary and community settings and ( b ) identify which cost variables are the key drivers of musculoskeletal health care costs within these settings. Methods: Medline, AMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, HMIC, BNI, and HBE electronic databases were searched for eligible studies. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed quality of costing methods using an established checklist. Results: Twenty-two studies met the review inclusion criteria. The majority of studies demonstrated moderate- to high-quality costing methods. Costing issues included studies failing to fully justify the economic perspective, and not distinguishing between short- and long-run costs. Highest unit costs were hospital admissions, outpatient visits, and imaging. Highest mean utilization were the following: general practitioner (GP) visits, outpatient visits, and physiotherapy visits. Highest mean costs per patient were GP visits, outpatient visits, and physiotherapy visits. Conclusion: This review identified a number of key resource use variables that are driving musculoskeletal health care costs in the community/primary care setting. High utilization of these resources (rather than high unit cost) appears to be the predominant factor increasing mean health care costs. There is, however, need for greater detail with capturing these key cost drivers, to further improve the accuracy of costing information.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2150132719899763
work_keys_str_mv AT roannaburgess costingmethodologyandkeydriversofhealthcarecostswithineconomicanalysesinmusculoskeletalcommunityandprimarycareservicesasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT jameshall costingmethodologyandkeydriversofhealthcarecostswithineconomicanalysesinmusculoskeletalcommunityandprimarycareservicesasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT annettebishop costingmethodologyandkeydriversofhealthcarecostswithineconomicanalysesinmusculoskeletalcommunityandprimarycareservicesasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT martynlewis costingmethodologyandkeydriversofhealthcarecostswithineconomicanalysesinmusculoskeletalcommunityandprimarycareservicesasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT jonathanhill costingmethodologyandkeydriversofhealthcarecostswithineconomicanalysesinmusculoskeletalcommunityandprimarycareservicesasystematicreviewoftheliterature
_version_ 1724507329742766080