The Impact of Lidar Elevation Uncertainty on Mapping Intertidal Habitats on Barrier Islands
While airborne lidar data have revolutionized the spatial resolution that elevations can be realized, data limitations are often magnified in coastal settings. Researchers have found that airborne lidar can have a vertical error as high as 60 cm in densely vegetated intertidal areas. The uncertainty...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2017-12-01
|
Series: | Remote Sensing |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/1/5 |
id |
doaj-ed5b103b11ac469cbb4aacea51b218ba |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ed5b103b11ac469cbb4aacea51b218ba2020-11-25T00:20:25ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922017-12-01101510.3390/rs10010005rs10010005The Impact of Lidar Elevation Uncertainty on Mapping Intertidal Habitats on Barrier IslandsNicholas M. Enwright0Lei Wang1Sinéad M. Borchert2Richard H. Day3Laura C. Feher4Michael J. Osland5Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Lafayette, LA 70506, USADepartment of Geography and Anthropology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USABorchert Consulting at the Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Lafayette, LA 70506, USAWetland and Aquatic Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Lafayette, LA 70506, USAWetland and Aquatic Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Lafayette, LA 70506, USAWetland and Aquatic Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Lafayette, LA 70506, USAWhile airborne lidar data have revolutionized the spatial resolution that elevations can be realized, data limitations are often magnified in coastal settings. Researchers have found that airborne lidar can have a vertical error as high as 60 cm in densely vegetated intertidal areas. The uncertainty of digital elevation models is often left unaddressed; however, in low-relief environments, such as barrier islands, centimeter differences in elevation can affect exposure to physically demanding abiotic conditions, which greatly influence ecosystem structure and function. In this study, we used airborne lidar elevation data, in situ elevation observations, lidar metadata, and tide gauge information to delineate low-lying lands and the intertidal wetlands on Dauphin Island, a barrier island along the coast of Alabama, USA. We compared three different elevation error treatments, which included leaving error untreated and treatments that used Monte Carlo simulations to incorporate elevation vertical uncertainty using general information from lidar metadata and site-specific Real-Time Kinematic Global Position System data, respectively. To aid researchers in instances where limited information is available for error propagation, we conducted a sensitivity test to assess the effect of minor changes to error and bias. Treatment of error with site-specific observations produced the fewest omission errors, although the treatment using the lidar metadata had the most well-balanced results. The percent coverage of intertidal wetlands was increased by up to 80% when treating the vertical error of the digital elevation models. Based on the results from the sensitivity analysis, it could be reasonable to use error and positive bias values from literature for similar environments, conditions, and lidar acquisition characteristics in the event that collection of site-specific data is not feasible and information in the lidar metadata is insufficient. The methodology presented in this study should increase efficiency and enhance results for habitat mapping and analyses in dynamic, low-relief coastal environments.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/1/5lidarelevationuncertaintyMonte Carlobarrier islandsintertidal wetlandscoastal environmentshabitat mapping |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nicholas M. Enwright Lei Wang Sinéad M. Borchert Richard H. Day Laura C. Feher Michael J. Osland |
spellingShingle |
Nicholas M. Enwright Lei Wang Sinéad M. Borchert Richard H. Day Laura C. Feher Michael J. Osland The Impact of Lidar Elevation Uncertainty on Mapping Intertidal Habitats on Barrier Islands Remote Sensing lidar elevation uncertainty Monte Carlo barrier islands intertidal wetlands coastal environments habitat mapping |
author_facet |
Nicholas M. Enwright Lei Wang Sinéad M. Borchert Richard H. Day Laura C. Feher Michael J. Osland |
author_sort |
Nicholas M. Enwright |
title |
The Impact of Lidar Elevation Uncertainty on Mapping Intertidal Habitats on Barrier Islands |
title_short |
The Impact of Lidar Elevation Uncertainty on Mapping Intertidal Habitats on Barrier Islands |
title_full |
The Impact of Lidar Elevation Uncertainty on Mapping Intertidal Habitats on Barrier Islands |
title_fullStr |
The Impact of Lidar Elevation Uncertainty on Mapping Intertidal Habitats on Barrier Islands |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Impact of Lidar Elevation Uncertainty on Mapping Intertidal Habitats on Barrier Islands |
title_sort |
impact of lidar elevation uncertainty on mapping intertidal habitats on barrier islands |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Remote Sensing |
issn |
2072-4292 |
publishDate |
2017-12-01 |
description |
While airborne lidar data have revolutionized the spatial resolution that elevations can be realized, data limitations are often magnified in coastal settings. Researchers have found that airborne lidar can have a vertical error as high as 60 cm in densely vegetated intertidal areas. The uncertainty of digital elevation models is often left unaddressed; however, in low-relief environments, such as barrier islands, centimeter differences in elevation can affect exposure to physically demanding abiotic conditions, which greatly influence ecosystem structure and function. In this study, we used airborne lidar elevation data, in situ elevation observations, lidar metadata, and tide gauge information to delineate low-lying lands and the intertidal wetlands on Dauphin Island, a barrier island along the coast of Alabama, USA. We compared three different elevation error treatments, which included leaving error untreated and treatments that used Monte Carlo simulations to incorporate elevation vertical uncertainty using general information from lidar metadata and site-specific Real-Time Kinematic Global Position System data, respectively. To aid researchers in instances where limited information is available for error propagation, we conducted a sensitivity test to assess the effect of minor changes to error and bias. Treatment of error with site-specific observations produced the fewest omission errors, although the treatment using the lidar metadata had the most well-balanced results. The percent coverage of intertidal wetlands was increased by up to 80% when treating the vertical error of the digital elevation models. Based on the results from the sensitivity analysis, it could be reasonable to use error and positive bias values from literature for similar environments, conditions, and lidar acquisition characteristics in the event that collection of site-specific data is not feasible and information in the lidar metadata is insufficient. The methodology presented in this study should increase efficiency and enhance results for habitat mapping and analyses in dynamic, low-relief coastal environments. |
topic |
lidar elevation uncertainty Monte Carlo barrier islands intertidal wetlands coastal environments habitat mapping |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/1/5 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nicholasmenwright theimpactoflidarelevationuncertaintyonmappingintertidalhabitatsonbarrierislands AT leiwang theimpactoflidarelevationuncertaintyonmappingintertidalhabitatsonbarrierislands AT sineadmborchert theimpactoflidarelevationuncertaintyonmappingintertidalhabitatsonbarrierislands AT richardhday theimpactoflidarelevationuncertaintyonmappingintertidalhabitatsonbarrierislands AT lauracfeher theimpactoflidarelevationuncertaintyonmappingintertidalhabitatsonbarrierislands AT michaeljosland theimpactoflidarelevationuncertaintyonmappingintertidalhabitatsonbarrierislands AT nicholasmenwright impactoflidarelevationuncertaintyonmappingintertidalhabitatsonbarrierislands AT leiwang impactoflidarelevationuncertaintyonmappingintertidalhabitatsonbarrierislands AT sineadmborchert impactoflidarelevationuncertaintyonmappingintertidalhabitatsonbarrierislands AT richardhday impactoflidarelevationuncertaintyonmappingintertidalhabitatsonbarrierislands AT lauracfeher impactoflidarelevationuncertaintyonmappingintertidalhabitatsonbarrierislands AT michaeljosland impactoflidarelevationuncertaintyonmappingintertidalhabitatsonbarrierislands |
_version_ |
1725367843367682048 |