Clinician Assessment Tools for Patients with Diabetic Foot Disease: A Systematic Review

The amputation rate in patients with diabetes is 15 to 40 times higher than in patients without diabetes. To avoid major complications, the identification of high-risk in patients with diabetes through early assessment highlights as a crucial action. Clinician assessment tools are scales in which cl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raúl Fernández-Torres, María Ruiz-Muñoz, Alberto J. Pérez-Panero, Jerónimo C. García-Romero, Manuel Gónzalez-Sánchez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/5/1487
id doaj-ed942c4de7254e64be4e236bae70f3e1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ed942c4de7254e64be4e236bae70f3e12020-11-25T03:14:01ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832020-05-0191487148710.3390/jcm9051487Clinician Assessment Tools for Patients with Diabetic Foot Disease: A Systematic ReviewRaúl Fernández-Torres0María Ruiz-Muñoz1Alberto J. Pérez-Panero2Jerónimo C. García-Romero3Manuel Gónzalez-Sánchez4Department of Nursing and Podiatry, University of Málaga, Arquitecto Francisco Peñalosa, s/n. Ampliación Campus de Teatinos, 29071 Málaga, SpainDepartment of Nursing and Podiatry, University of Málaga, Arquitecto Francisco Peñalosa, s/n. Ampliación Campus de Teatinos, 29071 Málaga, SpainDepartment of Nursing and Podiatry, University of Málaga, Arquitecto Francisco Peñalosa, s/n. Ampliación Campus de Teatinos, 29071 Málaga, SpainMedical School of Physical Education and Sports, University of Málaga, C/Jiménez Fraud 10. Edificio López de Peñalver, 29010 Málaga, SpainDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Málaga, Arquitecto Francisco Peñalosa, s/n. Ampliación campus de Teatinos, 29071 Málaga, SpainThe amputation rate in patients with diabetes is 15 to 40 times higher than in patients without diabetes. To avoid major complications, the identification of high-risk in patients with diabetes through early assessment highlights as a crucial action. Clinician assessment tools are scales in which clinical examiners are specifically trained to make a correct judgment based on patient outcomes that helps to identify at-risk patients and monitor the intervention. The aim of this study is to carry out a systematic review of valid and reliable Clinician assessment tools for measuring diabetic foot disease-related variables and analysing their psychometric properties. The databases used were PubMed, Scopus, SciELO, CINAHL, Cochrane, PEDro, and EMBASE. The search terms used were foot, ankle, diabetes, diabetic foot, assessment, tools, instruments, score, scale, validity, and reliability. The results showed 29 validated studies with 39 Clinician assessment tools and six variables. There is limited evidence on all of the psychometric characteristics of the Clinician assessment tools included in this review, although some instruments have been shown to be valid and reliable for the assessment of diabetic neuropathy (Utah Early Neuropathy Scale or UENS); ulceration risk (Queensland High Risk Foot Form or QHRFF); diabetic foot ulcer assessment, scoring, and amputation risk (Perfusion, extent, depth, infection and sensation scale or PEDIS and Site, Ischemia, Neuropathy, Bacterial Infection, and Depth score or SINBAD); and diabetic foot ulcer measurement (Leg Ulcer Measurement Tool LUMT).https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/5/1487diabetesdiabetes complicationsulceroutcome measuresevidencereview
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Raúl Fernández-Torres
María Ruiz-Muñoz
Alberto J. Pérez-Panero
Jerónimo C. García-Romero
Manuel Gónzalez-Sánchez
spellingShingle Raúl Fernández-Torres
María Ruiz-Muñoz
Alberto J. Pérez-Panero
Jerónimo C. García-Romero
Manuel Gónzalez-Sánchez
Clinician Assessment Tools for Patients with Diabetic Foot Disease: A Systematic Review
Journal of Clinical Medicine
diabetes
diabetes complications
ulcer
outcome measures
evidence
review
author_facet Raúl Fernández-Torres
María Ruiz-Muñoz
Alberto J. Pérez-Panero
Jerónimo C. García-Romero
Manuel Gónzalez-Sánchez
author_sort Raúl Fernández-Torres
title Clinician Assessment Tools for Patients with Diabetic Foot Disease: A Systematic Review
title_short Clinician Assessment Tools for Patients with Diabetic Foot Disease: A Systematic Review
title_full Clinician Assessment Tools for Patients with Diabetic Foot Disease: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Clinician Assessment Tools for Patients with Diabetic Foot Disease: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Clinician Assessment Tools for Patients with Diabetic Foot Disease: A Systematic Review
title_sort clinician assessment tools for patients with diabetic foot disease: a systematic review
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
issn 2077-0383
publishDate 2020-05-01
description The amputation rate in patients with diabetes is 15 to 40 times higher than in patients without diabetes. To avoid major complications, the identification of high-risk in patients with diabetes through early assessment highlights as a crucial action. Clinician assessment tools are scales in which clinical examiners are specifically trained to make a correct judgment based on patient outcomes that helps to identify at-risk patients and monitor the intervention. The aim of this study is to carry out a systematic review of valid and reliable Clinician assessment tools for measuring diabetic foot disease-related variables and analysing their psychometric properties. The databases used were PubMed, Scopus, SciELO, CINAHL, Cochrane, PEDro, and EMBASE. The search terms used were foot, ankle, diabetes, diabetic foot, assessment, tools, instruments, score, scale, validity, and reliability. The results showed 29 validated studies with 39 Clinician assessment tools and six variables. There is limited evidence on all of the psychometric characteristics of the Clinician assessment tools included in this review, although some instruments have been shown to be valid and reliable for the assessment of diabetic neuropathy (Utah Early Neuropathy Scale or UENS); ulceration risk (Queensland High Risk Foot Form or QHRFF); diabetic foot ulcer assessment, scoring, and amputation risk (Perfusion, extent, depth, infection and sensation scale or PEDIS and Site, Ischemia, Neuropathy, Bacterial Infection, and Depth score or SINBAD); and diabetic foot ulcer measurement (Leg Ulcer Measurement Tool LUMT).
topic diabetes
diabetes complications
ulcer
outcome measures
evidence
review
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/5/1487
work_keys_str_mv AT raulfernandeztorres clinicianassessmenttoolsforpatientswithdiabeticfootdiseaseasystematicreview
AT mariaruizmunoz clinicianassessmenttoolsforpatientswithdiabeticfootdiseaseasystematicreview
AT albertojperezpanero clinicianassessmenttoolsforpatientswithdiabeticfootdiseaseasystematicreview
AT jeronimocgarciaromero clinicianassessmenttoolsforpatientswithdiabeticfootdiseaseasystematicreview
AT manuelgonzalezsanchez clinicianassessmenttoolsforpatientswithdiabeticfootdiseaseasystematicreview
_version_ 1724645115246411776