Application of different scoring systems and their value in pediatric intensive care unit

Background: Little is known on the impact of risk factors that may complicate the course of critical illness. Scoring systems in ICUs allow assessment of the severity of diseases and predicting mortality. Objectives: Apply commonly used scores for assessment of illness severity and identify the comb...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hanaa I. Rady, Shereen A. Mohamed, Nabil A. Mohssen, Mohamed ElBaz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2014-09-01
Series:Egyptian Pediatric Association Gazette
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110663814000494
id doaj-ed95cf7386d648379f3ba626a34dfb41
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ed95cf7386d648379f3ba626a34dfb412020-11-25T01:30:51ZengSpringerOpenEgyptian Pediatric Association Gazette1110-66382014-09-01623596410.1016/j.epag.2014.10.003Application of different scoring systems and their value in pediatric intensive care unitHanaa I. RadyShereen A. MohamedNabil A. MohssenMohamed ElBazBackground: Little is known on the impact of risk factors that may complicate the course of critical illness. Scoring systems in ICUs allow assessment of the severity of diseases and predicting mortality. Objectives: Apply commonly used scores for assessment of illness severity and identify the combination of factors predicting patient’s outcome. Methods: We included 231 patients admitted to PICU of Cairo University, Pediatric Hospital. PRISM III, PIM2, PEMOD, PELOD, TISS and SOFA scores were applied on the day of admission. Follow up was done using SOFA score and TISS. Results: There were positive correlations between PRISM III, PIM2, PELOD, PEMOD, SOFA and TISS on the day of admission, and the mortality rate (p < 0.0001). TISS and SOFA score had the highest discrimination ability (AUC: 0.81, 0.765, respectively). Significant positive correlations were found between SOFA score and TISS scores on days 1, 3 and 7 and PICU mortality rate (p < 0.0001). TISS had more ability of discrimination than SOFA score on day 1 (AUC: 0.843, 0.787, respectively). Conclusion: Scoring systems applied in PICU had good discrimination ability. TISS was a good tool for follow up. LOS, mechanical ventilation and inotropes were risk factors of mortality.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110663814000494Scoring systemsPediatric intensive care unitMortality rateCritical careIllness severityMultiple organ dysfunction
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hanaa I. Rady
Shereen A. Mohamed
Nabil A. Mohssen
Mohamed ElBaz
spellingShingle Hanaa I. Rady
Shereen A. Mohamed
Nabil A. Mohssen
Mohamed ElBaz
Application of different scoring systems and their value in pediatric intensive care unit
Egyptian Pediatric Association Gazette
Scoring systems
Pediatric intensive care unit
Mortality rate
Critical care
Illness severity
Multiple organ dysfunction
author_facet Hanaa I. Rady
Shereen A. Mohamed
Nabil A. Mohssen
Mohamed ElBaz
author_sort Hanaa I. Rady
title Application of different scoring systems and their value in pediatric intensive care unit
title_short Application of different scoring systems and their value in pediatric intensive care unit
title_full Application of different scoring systems and their value in pediatric intensive care unit
title_fullStr Application of different scoring systems and their value in pediatric intensive care unit
title_full_unstemmed Application of different scoring systems and their value in pediatric intensive care unit
title_sort application of different scoring systems and their value in pediatric intensive care unit
publisher SpringerOpen
series Egyptian Pediatric Association Gazette
issn 1110-6638
publishDate 2014-09-01
description Background: Little is known on the impact of risk factors that may complicate the course of critical illness. Scoring systems in ICUs allow assessment of the severity of diseases and predicting mortality. Objectives: Apply commonly used scores for assessment of illness severity and identify the combination of factors predicting patient’s outcome. Methods: We included 231 patients admitted to PICU of Cairo University, Pediatric Hospital. PRISM III, PIM2, PEMOD, PELOD, TISS and SOFA scores were applied on the day of admission. Follow up was done using SOFA score and TISS. Results: There were positive correlations between PRISM III, PIM2, PELOD, PEMOD, SOFA and TISS on the day of admission, and the mortality rate (p < 0.0001). TISS and SOFA score had the highest discrimination ability (AUC: 0.81, 0.765, respectively). Significant positive correlations were found between SOFA score and TISS scores on days 1, 3 and 7 and PICU mortality rate (p < 0.0001). TISS had more ability of discrimination than SOFA score on day 1 (AUC: 0.843, 0.787, respectively). Conclusion: Scoring systems applied in PICU had good discrimination ability. TISS was a good tool for follow up. LOS, mechanical ventilation and inotropes were risk factors of mortality.
topic Scoring systems
Pediatric intensive care unit
Mortality rate
Critical care
Illness severity
Multiple organ dysfunction
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110663814000494
work_keys_str_mv AT hanaairady applicationofdifferentscoringsystemsandtheirvalueinpediatricintensivecareunit
AT shereenamohamed applicationofdifferentscoringsystemsandtheirvalueinpediatricintensivecareunit
AT nabilamohssen applicationofdifferentscoringsystemsandtheirvalueinpediatricintensivecareunit
AT mohamedelbaz applicationofdifferentscoringsystemsandtheirvalueinpediatricintensivecareunit
_version_ 1725089352980103168