Application of different scoring systems and their value in pediatric intensive care unit
Background: Little is known on the impact of risk factors that may complicate the course of critical illness. Scoring systems in ICUs allow assessment of the severity of diseases and predicting mortality. Objectives: Apply commonly used scores for assessment of illness severity and identify the comb...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2014-09-01
|
Series: | Egyptian Pediatric Association Gazette |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110663814000494 |
id |
doaj-ed95cf7386d648379f3ba626a34dfb41 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ed95cf7386d648379f3ba626a34dfb412020-11-25T01:30:51ZengSpringerOpenEgyptian Pediatric Association Gazette1110-66382014-09-01623596410.1016/j.epag.2014.10.003Application of different scoring systems and their value in pediatric intensive care unitHanaa I. RadyShereen A. MohamedNabil A. MohssenMohamed ElBazBackground: Little is known on the impact of risk factors that may complicate the course of critical illness. Scoring systems in ICUs allow assessment of the severity of diseases and predicting mortality. Objectives: Apply commonly used scores for assessment of illness severity and identify the combination of factors predicting patient’s outcome. Methods: We included 231 patients admitted to PICU of Cairo University, Pediatric Hospital. PRISM III, PIM2, PEMOD, PELOD, TISS and SOFA scores were applied on the day of admission. Follow up was done using SOFA score and TISS. Results: There were positive correlations between PRISM III, PIM2, PELOD, PEMOD, SOFA and TISS on the day of admission, and the mortality rate (p < 0.0001). TISS and SOFA score had the highest discrimination ability (AUC: 0.81, 0.765, respectively). Significant positive correlations were found between SOFA score and TISS scores on days 1, 3 and 7 and PICU mortality rate (p < 0.0001). TISS had more ability of discrimination than SOFA score on day 1 (AUC: 0.843, 0.787, respectively). Conclusion: Scoring systems applied in PICU had good discrimination ability. TISS was a good tool for follow up. LOS, mechanical ventilation and inotropes were risk factors of mortality.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110663814000494Scoring systemsPediatric intensive care unitMortality rateCritical careIllness severityMultiple organ dysfunction |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hanaa I. Rady Shereen A. Mohamed Nabil A. Mohssen Mohamed ElBaz |
spellingShingle |
Hanaa I. Rady Shereen A. Mohamed Nabil A. Mohssen Mohamed ElBaz Application of different scoring systems and their value in pediatric intensive care unit Egyptian Pediatric Association Gazette Scoring systems Pediatric intensive care unit Mortality rate Critical care Illness severity Multiple organ dysfunction |
author_facet |
Hanaa I. Rady Shereen A. Mohamed Nabil A. Mohssen Mohamed ElBaz |
author_sort |
Hanaa I. Rady |
title |
Application of different scoring systems and their value in pediatric intensive care unit |
title_short |
Application of different scoring systems and their value in pediatric intensive care unit |
title_full |
Application of different scoring systems and their value in pediatric intensive care unit |
title_fullStr |
Application of different scoring systems and their value in pediatric intensive care unit |
title_full_unstemmed |
Application of different scoring systems and their value in pediatric intensive care unit |
title_sort |
application of different scoring systems and their value in pediatric intensive care unit |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
Egyptian Pediatric Association Gazette |
issn |
1110-6638 |
publishDate |
2014-09-01 |
description |
Background: Little is known on the impact of risk factors that may complicate the course of critical illness. Scoring systems in ICUs allow assessment of the severity of diseases and predicting mortality.
Objectives: Apply commonly used scores for assessment of illness severity and identify the combination of factors predicting patient’s outcome.
Methods: We included 231 patients admitted to PICU of Cairo University, Pediatric Hospital. PRISM III, PIM2, PEMOD, PELOD, TISS and SOFA scores were applied on the day of admission. Follow up was done using SOFA score and TISS.
Results: There were positive correlations between PRISM III, PIM2, PELOD, PEMOD, SOFA and TISS on the day of admission, and the mortality rate (p < 0.0001). TISS and SOFA score had the highest discrimination ability (AUC: 0.81, 0.765, respectively). Significant positive correlations were found between SOFA score and TISS scores on days 1, 3 and 7 and PICU mortality rate (p < 0.0001). TISS had more ability of discrimination than SOFA score on day 1 (AUC: 0.843, 0.787, respectively).
Conclusion: Scoring systems applied in PICU had good discrimination ability. TISS was a good tool for follow up. LOS, mechanical ventilation and inotropes were risk factors of mortality. |
topic |
Scoring systems Pediatric intensive care unit Mortality rate Critical care Illness severity Multiple organ dysfunction |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110663814000494 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hanaairady applicationofdifferentscoringsystemsandtheirvalueinpediatricintensivecareunit AT shereenamohamed applicationofdifferentscoringsystemsandtheirvalueinpediatricintensivecareunit AT nabilamohssen applicationofdifferentscoringsystemsandtheirvalueinpediatricintensivecareunit AT mohamedelbaz applicationofdifferentscoringsystemsandtheirvalueinpediatricintensivecareunit |
_version_ |
1725089352980103168 |