Sequence Knowledge on 'When' and 'What' Supports Dual-Tasking

The constraints in overlapping response selection have been established in dual-tasking studies with random sequence of stimuli and responses as well as random stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA). While this approach makes it possible to control for advance activation of upcoming stimuli or responses, i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fang Zhao, Robert Gaschler, Lisa Schneider, Roland Thomaschke, Eva Röttger, Hilde Haider
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2019-07-01
Series:Journal of Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/76
id doaj-edb371023459448fa26418e1ff703e6b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-edb371023459448fa26418e1ff703e6b2020-11-25T00:49:58ZengUbiquity PressJournal of Cognition2514-48202019-07-012110.5334/joc.7666Sequence Knowledge on 'When' and 'What' Supports Dual-TaskingFang Zhao0Robert Gaschler1Lisa Schneider2Roland Thomaschke3Eva Röttger4Hilde Haider5University of HagenUniversity of HagenUniversity of HagenUniversity of FreiburgUniversity of CologneUniversity of CologneThe constraints in overlapping response selection have been established in dual-tasking studies with random sequence of stimuli and responses as well as random stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA). While this approach makes it possible to control for advance activation of upcoming stimuli or responses, it leaves open whether such preparatory processing can indeed influence dual-task performance. We investigated whether and how the sequence of stimuli and responses and the sequence of SOAs can be learned and used under dual-tasking. In each trial, participants ('N' = 28 in Experiment 1 and 'N' = 30 in Experiment 2) were first presented with a random two-choice task followed by a four-choice Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT), presented in a sequence of length four (position sequence). The SOA (timing) sequence also had length four. In test phases, one or both of the sequences were randomized. Results showed that both position and timing sequences were learned and supported dual-task performance, suggesting that predictive processing with respect to timing and identity of stimuli and responses can help to circumvent the response selection bottleneck constraints. Furthermore, in contrast to previous work on acquisition of interval sequences in single tasking, we found that the sequence of 'what' (i.e. stimulus) and the sequence of ;when; (i.e. interval between two tasks) contributed independently to performance.https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/76sequence learningstimulus-response sequencetemporal sequenceaction effect of responseSRTT
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fang Zhao
Robert Gaschler
Lisa Schneider
Roland Thomaschke
Eva Röttger
Hilde Haider
spellingShingle Fang Zhao
Robert Gaschler
Lisa Schneider
Roland Thomaschke
Eva Röttger
Hilde Haider
Sequence Knowledge on 'When' and 'What' Supports Dual-Tasking
Journal of Cognition
sequence learning
stimulus-response sequence
temporal sequence
action effect of response
SRTT
author_facet Fang Zhao
Robert Gaschler
Lisa Schneider
Roland Thomaschke
Eva Röttger
Hilde Haider
author_sort Fang Zhao
title Sequence Knowledge on 'When' and 'What' Supports Dual-Tasking
title_short Sequence Knowledge on 'When' and 'What' Supports Dual-Tasking
title_full Sequence Knowledge on 'When' and 'What' Supports Dual-Tasking
title_fullStr Sequence Knowledge on 'When' and 'What' Supports Dual-Tasking
title_full_unstemmed Sequence Knowledge on 'When' and 'What' Supports Dual-Tasking
title_sort sequence knowledge on 'when' and 'what' supports dual-tasking
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Journal of Cognition
issn 2514-4820
publishDate 2019-07-01
description The constraints in overlapping response selection have been established in dual-tasking studies with random sequence of stimuli and responses as well as random stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA). While this approach makes it possible to control for advance activation of upcoming stimuli or responses, it leaves open whether such preparatory processing can indeed influence dual-task performance. We investigated whether and how the sequence of stimuli and responses and the sequence of SOAs can be learned and used under dual-tasking. In each trial, participants ('N' = 28 in Experiment 1 and 'N' = 30 in Experiment 2) were first presented with a random two-choice task followed by a four-choice Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT), presented in a sequence of length four (position sequence). The SOA (timing) sequence also had length four. In test phases, one or both of the sequences were randomized. Results showed that both position and timing sequences were learned and supported dual-task performance, suggesting that predictive processing with respect to timing and identity of stimuli and responses can help to circumvent the response selection bottleneck constraints. Furthermore, in contrast to previous work on acquisition of interval sequences in single tasking, we found that the sequence of 'what' (i.e. stimulus) and the sequence of ;when; (i.e. interval between two tasks) contributed independently to performance.
topic sequence learning
stimulus-response sequence
temporal sequence
action effect of response
SRTT
url https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/76
work_keys_str_mv AT fangzhao sequenceknowledgeonwhenandwhatsupportsdualtasking
AT robertgaschler sequenceknowledgeonwhenandwhatsupportsdualtasking
AT lisaschneider sequenceknowledgeonwhenandwhatsupportsdualtasking
AT rolandthomaschke sequenceknowledgeonwhenandwhatsupportsdualtasking
AT evarottger sequenceknowledgeonwhenandwhatsupportsdualtasking
AT hildehaider sequenceknowledgeonwhenandwhatsupportsdualtasking
_version_ 1725250063853158400