Non-confirming replication of “Performance of InSilicoVA for assigning causes of death to verbal autopsies: multisite validation study using clinical diagnostic gold standards,” by Flaxman et al.
Abstract Background A verbal autopsy (VA) is an interview conducted with the caregivers of someone who has recently died to describe the circumstances of the death. In recent years, several algorithmic methods have been developed to classify cause of death using VA data. The performance of one metho...
Main Authors: | Zehang Richard Li, Tyler H. McCormick, Samuel J. Clark |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-03-01
|
Series: | BMC Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-020-01518-9 |
Similar Items
-
Born to fail: flaws in replication design produce intended results
by: Abraham D. Flaxman, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01) -
Performance of InSilicoVA for assigning causes of death to verbal autopsies: multisite validation study using clinical diagnostic gold standards
by: Abraham D. Flaxman, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01) -
Performance of InterVA for assigning causes of death to verbal autopsies: multisite validation study using clinical diagnostic gold standards
by: Flaxman Abraham D, et al.
Published: (2011-08-01) -
Strengthening standardised interpretation of verbal autopsy data: the new InterVA-4 tool
by: Peter Byass, et al.
Published: (2012-09-01) -
Validating physician-certified verbal autopsy and probabilistic modeling (InterVA) approaches to verbal autopsy interpretation using hospital causes of adult deaths
by: Tsofa Benjamin, et al.
Published: (2011-08-01)