Watchdogs, Advocates and Adversaries: Journalists’ Relational Role Conceptions in Asylum Reporting

Journalistic role conceptions are usually understood as internalised professional conventions about the tasks reporters pursue in society. This study insists that more attention be put on the relational and context-dependent nature of journalistic role conceptions. Adopting a social-interactionist a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Markus Ojala, Reeta Pöyhtäri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2018-06-01
Series:Media and Communication
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/1284
id doaj-edf56cbb2a134b82aa78e44b4ac48fdf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-edf56cbb2a134b82aa78e44b4ac48fdf2020-11-24T22:58:12ZengCogitatioMedia and Communication2183-24392018-06-016216817810.17645/mac.v6i2.1284775Watchdogs, Advocates and Adversaries: Journalists’ Relational Role Conceptions in Asylum ReportingMarkus Ojala0Reeta Pöyhtäri1Department of Social Research, University of Helsinki, FinlandResearch Centre for Journalism, Media and Communication COMET, University of Tampere, FinlandJournalistic role conceptions are usually understood as internalised professional conventions about the tasks reporters pursue in society. This study insists that more attention be put on the relational and context-dependent nature of journalistic role conceptions. Adopting a social-interactionist approach to journalistic roles, the study examines how Finnish journalists conceived of their professional roles when covering asylum issues during the so-called “refugee crisis” of 2015–2016. Based on an analysis of open-ended, semi-structured interviews with 24 journalists, we highlight how considerations of the political context and interactions with three key reference groups—officials, asylum seekers and anti-immigrant publics—shaped the journalists’ conceptions of their tasks and duties. The article contributes to the study of journalistic role conceptions by illustrating how the conceptualisation of journalistic roles in relation to reference groups takes place in practice. It also sheds light on the tensions involved in journalistic balancing and negotiation between various available role conceptions, especially in the shifting societal and political contexts of a Europe marked by multiculturalism and the simultaneous rise of anti-immigrant movements.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/1284asylum seekersmigrationjournalismrefugee crisisrolerole conception
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Markus Ojala
Reeta Pöyhtäri
spellingShingle Markus Ojala
Reeta Pöyhtäri
Watchdogs, Advocates and Adversaries: Journalists’ Relational Role Conceptions in Asylum Reporting
Media and Communication
asylum seekers
migration
journalism
refugee crisis
role
role conception
author_facet Markus Ojala
Reeta Pöyhtäri
author_sort Markus Ojala
title Watchdogs, Advocates and Adversaries: Journalists’ Relational Role Conceptions in Asylum Reporting
title_short Watchdogs, Advocates and Adversaries: Journalists’ Relational Role Conceptions in Asylum Reporting
title_full Watchdogs, Advocates and Adversaries: Journalists’ Relational Role Conceptions in Asylum Reporting
title_fullStr Watchdogs, Advocates and Adversaries: Journalists’ Relational Role Conceptions in Asylum Reporting
title_full_unstemmed Watchdogs, Advocates and Adversaries: Journalists’ Relational Role Conceptions in Asylum Reporting
title_sort watchdogs, advocates and adversaries: journalists’ relational role conceptions in asylum reporting
publisher Cogitatio
series Media and Communication
issn 2183-2439
publishDate 2018-06-01
description Journalistic role conceptions are usually understood as internalised professional conventions about the tasks reporters pursue in society. This study insists that more attention be put on the relational and context-dependent nature of journalistic role conceptions. Adopting a social-interactionist approach to journalistic roles, the study examines how Finnish journalists conceived of their professional roles when covering asylum issues during the so-called “refugee crisis” of 2015–2016. Based on an analysis of open-ended, semi-structured interviews with 24 journalists, we highlight how considerations of the political context and interactions with three key reference groups—officials, asylum seekers and anti-immigrant publics—shaped the journalists’ conceptions of their tasks and duties. The article contributes to the study of journalistic role conceptions by illustrating how the conceptualisation of journalistic roles in relation to reference groups takes place in practice. It also sheds light on the tensions involved in journalistic balancing and negotiation between various available role conceptions, especially in the shifting societal and political contexts of a Europe marked by multiculturalism and the simultaneous rise of anti-immigrant movements.
topic asylum seekers
migration
journalism
refugee crisis
role
role conception
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/1284
work_keys_str_mv AT markusojala watchdogsadvocatesandadversariesjournalistsrelationalroleconceptionsinasylumreporting
AT reetapoyhtari watchdogsadvocatesandadversariesjournalistsrelationalroleconceptionsinasylumreporting
_version_ 1725648108397789184