Semantic segmentation of HeLa cells: An objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures

The quantitative study of cell morphology is of great importance as the structure and condition of cells and their structures can be related to conditions of health or disease. The first step towards that, is the accurate segmentation of cell structures. In this work, we compare five approaches, one...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cefa Karabağ, Martin L. Jones, Christopher J. Peddie, Anne E. Weston, Lucy M. Collinson, Constantino Carlos Reyes-Aldasoro, Yuanquan Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7531863/?tool=EBI
id doaj-ee24a1842df7407da96438028c2b0181
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ee24a1842df7407da96438028c2b01812020-11-25T02:19:13ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-011510Semantic segmentation of HeLa cells: An objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architecturesCefa KarabağMartin L. JonesChristopher J. PeddieAnne E. WestonLucy M. CollinsonConstantino Carlos Reyes-AldasoroYuanquan WangThe quantitative study of cell morphology is of great importance as the structure and condition of cells and their structures can be related to conditions of health or disease. The first step towards that, is the accurate segmentation of cell structures. In this work, we compare five approaches, one traditional and four deep-learning, for the semantic segmentation of the nuclear envelope of cervical cancer cells commonly known as HeLa cells. Images of a HeLa cancer cell were semantically segmented with one traditional image-processing algorithm and four three deep learning architectures: VGG16, ResNet18, Inception-ResNet-v2, and U-Net. Three hundred slices, each 2000 × 2000 pixels, of a HeLa Cell were acquired with Serial Block Face Scanning Electron Microscopy. The first three deep learning architectures were pre-trained with ImageNet and then fine-tuned with transfer learning. The U-Net architecture was trained from scratch with 36, 000 training images and labels of size 128 × 128. The image-processing algorithm followed a pipeline of several traditional steps like edge detection, dilation and morphological operators. The algorithms were compared by measuring pixel-based segmentation accuracy and Jaccard index against a labelled ground truth. The results indicated a superior performance of the traditional algorithm (Accuracy = 99%, Jaccard = 93%) over the deep learning architectures: VGG16 (93%, 90%), ResNet18 (94%, 88%), Inception-ResNet-v2 (94%, 89%), and U-Net (92%, 56%).https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7531863/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cefa Karabağ
Martin L. Jones
Christopher J. Peddie
Anne E. Weston
Lucy M. Collinson
Constantino Carlos Reyes-Aldasoro
Yuanquan Wang
spellingShingle Cefa Karabağ
Martin L. Jones
Christopher J. Peddie
Anne E. Weston
Lucy M. Collinson
Constantino Carlos Reyes-Aldasoro
Yuanquan Wang
Semantic segmentation of HeLa cells: An objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures
PLoS ONE
author_facet Cefa Karabağ
Martin L. Jones
Christopher J. Peddie
Anne E. Weston
Lucy M. Collinson
Constantino Carlos Reyes-Aldasoro
Yuanquan Wang
author_sort Cefa Karabağ
title Semantic segmentation of HeLa cells: An objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures
title_short Semantic segmentation of HeLa cells: An objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures
title_full Semantic segmentation of HeLa cells: An objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures
title_fullStr Semantic segmentation of HeLa cells: An objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures
title_full_unstemmed Semantic segmentation of HeLa cells: An objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures
title_sort semantic segmentation of hela cells: an objective comparison between one traditional algorithm and four deep-learning architectures
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description The quantitative study of cell morphology is of great importance as the structure and condition of cells and their structures can be related to conditions of health or disease. The first step towards that, is the accurate segmentation of cell structures. In this work, we compare five approaches, one traditional and four deep-learning, for the semantic segmentation of the nuclear envelope of cervical cancer cells commonly known as HeLa cells. Images of a HeLa cancer cell were semantically segmented with one traditional image-processing algorithm and four three deep learning architectures: VGG16, ResNet18, Inception-ResNet-v2, and U-Net. Three hundred slices, each 2000 × 2000 pixels, of a HeLa Cell were acquired with Serial Block Face Scanning Electron Microscopy. The first three deep learning architectures were pre-trained with ImageNet and then fine-tuned with transfer learning. The U-Net architecture was trained from scratch with 36, 000 training images and labels of size 128 × 128. The image-processing algorithm followed a pipeline of several traditional steps like edge detection, dilation and morphological operators. The algorithms were compared by measuring pixel-based segmentation accuracy and Jaccard index against a labelled ground truth. The results indicated a superior performance of the traditional algorithm (Accuracy = 99%, Jaccard = 93%) over the deep learning architectures: VGG16 (93%, 90%), ResNet18 (94%, 88%), Inception-ResNet-v2 (94%, 89%), and U-Net (92%, 56%).
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7531863/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT cefakarabag semanticsegmentationofhelacellsanobjectivecomparisonbetweenonetraditionalalgorithmandfourdeeplearningarchitectures
AT martinljones semanticsegmentationofhelacellsanobjectivecomparisonbetweenonetraditionalalgorithmandfourdeeplearningarchitectures
AT christopherjpeddie semanticsegmentationofhelacellsanobjectivecomparisonbetweenonetraditionalalgorithmandfourdeeplearningarchitectures
AT anneeweston semanticsegmentationofhelacellsanobjectivecomparisonbetweenonetraditionalalgorithmandfourdeeplearningarchitectures
AT lucymcollinson semanticsegmentationofhelacellsanobjectivecomparisonbetweenonetraditionalalgorithmandfourdeeplearningarchitectures
AT constantinocarlosreyesaldasoro semanticsegmentationofhelacellsanobjectivecomparisonbetweenonetraditionalalgorithmandfourdeeplearningarchitectures
AT yuanquanwang semanticsegmentationofhelacellsanobjectivecomparisonbetweenonetraditionalalgorithmandfourdeeplearningarchitectures
_version_ 1724877531540094976