Interventions to address social connectedness and loneliness for older adults: a scoping review

Abstract Background Older adults are at risk for loneliness, and interventions to promote social connectedness are needed to directly address this problem. The nature of interventions aimed to affect the distinct, subjective concepts of loneliness/social connectedness has not been clearly described....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hannah M. O’Rourke, Laura Collins, Souraya Sidani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-09-01
Series:BMC Geriatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12877-018-0897-x
id doaj-ee2965049ca2477884a4b57a16c479a4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ee2965049ca2477884a4b57a16c479a42020-11-25T03:17:07ZengBMCBMC Geriatrics1471-23182018-09-0118111310.1186/s12877-018-0897-xInterventions to address social connectedness and loneliness for older adults: a scoping reviewHannah M. O’Rourke0Laura Collins1Souraya Sidani2Faculty of Nursing Level 3, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of AlbertaDaphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Ryerson UniversityDaphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Ryerson UniversityAbstract Background Older adults are at risk for loneliness, and interventions to promote social connectedness are needed to directly address this problem. The nature of interventions aimed to affect the distinct, subjective concepts of loneliness/social connectedness has not been clearly described. The purpose of this review was to map the literature on interventions and strategies to affect loneliness/social connectedness for older adults. Methods A comprehensive scoping review was conducted. Six electronic databases were searched from inception in July 2015, resulting in 5530 unique records. Standardized inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied, resulting in a set of 44 studies (reported in 54 articles) for further analysis. Data were extracted to describe the interventions and strategies, and the context of the included studies. Analytic techniques included calculating frequencies, manifest content analysis and meta-summary. Results Interventions were described or evaluated in 39 studies, and five studies described strategies to affect loneliness/social connectedness of older adults or their caregivers in a qualitative descriptive study. The studies were often conducted in the United States (38.6%) among community dwelling (54.5%), cognitively intact (31.8%), and female-majority (86.4%) samples. Few focused on non-white participants (4.5%). Strategies described most often were engaging in purposeful activity and maintaining contact with one’s social network. Of nine intervention types identified, the most frequently described were One-to-One Personal Contact and Group Activity. Authors held divergent views of why the same type of intervention might impact social connectedness, but social contact was the most frequently conceptualized influencing factor targeted, both within and across intervention types. Conclusions Research to test the divergent theories of why interventions work is needed to advance understanding of intervention mechanisms. Innovative conceptualizations of intervention targets are needed, such as purposeful activity, that move beyond the current focus on the objective social network as a way to promote social connectedness for older adults.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12877-018-0897-xLonelinessSocial connectednessInterventionScoping reviewOlder adult
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hannah M. O’Rourke
Laura Collins
Souraya Sidani
spellingShingle Hannah M. O’Rourke
Laura Collins
Souraya Sidani
Interventions to address social connectedness and loneliness for older adults: a scoping review
BMC Geriatrics
Loneliness
Social connectedness
Intervention
Scoping review
Older adult
author_facet Hannah M. O’Rourke
Laura Collins
Souraya Sidani
author_sort Hannah M. O’Rourke
title Interventions to address social connectedness and loneliness for older adults: a scoping review
title_short Interventions to address social connectedness and loneliness for older adults: a scoping review
title_full Interventions to address social connectedness and loneliness for older adults: a scoping review
title_fullStr Interventions to address social connectedness and loneliness for older adults: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Interventions to address social connectedness and loneliness for older adults: a scoping review
title_sort interventions to address social connectedness and loneliness for older adults: a scoping review
publisher BMC
series BMC Geriatrics
issn 1471-2318
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Abstract Background Older adults are at risk for loneliness, and interventions to promote social connectedness are needed to directly address this problem. The nature of interventions aimed to affect the distinct, subjective concepts of loneliness/social connectedness has not been clearly described. The purpose of this review was to map the literature on interventions and strategies to affect loneliness/social connectedness for older adults. Methods A comprehensive scoping review was conducted. Six electronic databases were searched from inception in July 2015, resulting in 5530 unique records. Standardized inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied, resulting in a set of 44 studies (reported in 54 articles) for further analysis. Data were extracted to describe the interventions and strategies, and the context of the included studies. Analytic techniques included calculating frequencies, manifest content analysis and meta-summary. Results Interventions were described or evaluated in 39 studies, and five studies described strategies to affect loneliness/social connectedness of older adults or their caregivers in a qualitative descriptive study. The studies were often conducted in the United States (38.6%) among community dwelling (54.5%), cognitively intact (31.8%), and female-majority (86.4%) samples. Few focused on non-white participants (4.5%). Strategies described most often were engaging in purposeful activity and maintaining contact with one’s social network. Of nine intervention types identified, the most frequently described were One-to-One Personal Contact and Group Activity. Authors held divergent views of why the same type of intervention might impact social connectedness, but social contact was the most frequently conceptualized influencing factor targeted, both within and across intervention types. Conclusions Research to test the divergent theories of why interventions work is needed to advance understanding of intervention mechanisms. Innovative conceptualizations of intervention targets are needed, such as purposeful activity, that move beyond the current focus on the objective social network as a way to promote social connectedness for older adults.
topic Loneliness
Social connectedness
Intervention
Scoping review
Older adult
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12877-018-0897-x
work_keys_str_mv AT hannahmorourke interventionstoaddresssocialconnectednessandlonelinessforolderadultsascopingreview
AT lauracollins interventionstoaddresssocialconnectednessandlonelinessforolderadultsascopingreview
AT sourayasidani interventionstoaddresssocialconnectednessandlonelinessforolderadultsascopingreview
_version_ 1724633286811058176