Diagnostic Value of Sural Nerve Biopsy: Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Cases From 1981 to 2017

Nerve biopsy represents the conclusive step in the diagnostic work-up of peripheral neuropathies, and its diagnostic yield is still debated. The aim of this study is to consider the impact of nerve biopsy on reaching a useful diagnosis in different peripheral neuropathies and its changing over time....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Valeria Prada, Sara Massucco, Consuelo Venturi, Alessandro Geroldi, Emilia Bellone, Paola Mandich, Michele Minuto, Emanuela Varaldo, Giovanni Mancardi, Marina Grandis, Angelo Schenone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2019.01218/full
id doaj-ee90335d366a48b69ffe18b348374fe0
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Valeria Prada
Sara Massucco
Consuelo Venturi
Alessandro Geroldi
Alessandro Geroldi
Emilia Bellone
Emilia Bellone
Paola Mandich
Paola Mandich
Michele Minuto
Michele Minuto
Emanuela Varaldo
Emanuela Varaldo
Giovanni Mancardi
Giovanni Mancardi
Marina Grandis
Marina Grandis
Angelo Schenone
Angelo Schenone
spellingShingle Valeria Prada
Sara Massucco
Consuelo Venturi
Alessandro Geroldi
Alessandro Geroldi
Emilia Bellone
Emilia Bellone
Paola Mandich
Paola Mandich
Michele Minuto
Michele Minuto
Emanuela Varaldo
Emanuela Varaldo
Giovanni Mancardi
Giovanni Mancardi
Marina Grandis
Marina Grandis
Angelo Schenone
Angelo Schenone
Diagnostic Value of Sural Nerve Biopsy: Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Cases From 1981 to 2017
Frontiers in Neurology
sural nerve biopsy
vasculitic neuropathy
amyloidotic neuropathy
neuropathy
axonal neuropathies
demyelinating neuropathies
author_facet Valeria Prada
Sara Massucco
Consuelo Venturi
Alessandro Geroldi
Alessandro Geroldi
Emilia Bellone
Emilia Bellone
Paola Mandich
Paola Mandich
Michele Minuto
Michele Minuto
Emanuela Varaldo
Emanuela Varaldo
Giovanni Mancardi
Giovanni Mancardi
Marina Grandis
Marina Grandis
Angelo Schenone
Angelo Schenone
author_sort Valeria Prada
title Diagnostic Value of Sural Nerve Biopsy: Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Cases From 1981 to 2017
title_short Diagnostic Value of Sural Nerve Biopsy: Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Cases From 1981 to 2017
title_full Diagnostic Value of Sural Nerve Biopsy: Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Cases From 1981 to 2017
title_fullStr Diagnostic Value of Sural Nerve Biopsy: Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Cases From 1981 to 2017
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Value of Sural Nerve Biopsy: Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Cases From 1981 to 2017
title_sort diagnostic value of sural nerve biopsy: retrospective analysis of clinical cases from 1981 to 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neurology
issn 1664-2295
publishDate 2019-11-01
description Nerve biopsy represents the conclusive step in the diagnostic work-up of peripheral neuropathies, and its diagnostic yield is still debated. The aim of this study is to consider the impact of nerve biopsy on reaching a useful diagnosis in different peripheral neuropathies and its changing over time. We retrospectively analyzed 1,179 sural nerve biopsies performed in the period 1981–2017 at Neurological Clinic of Policlinico San Martino (Genoa). We relied on medical records and collected both clinical and pathological data in a database. Biopsy provided univocal diagnoses in 53% of cases (with an increase over time), multiple diagnostic options in 14%, while diagnosis was undetermined in 33% (undetermined reports decreased during the years). In 57% of patients, the pre-biopsy suspicion was confirmed, while in 43% sural biopsy modified the clinical diagnosis. The highest yield was in axonal neuropathies (29% undetermined reports vs. 40% in demyelinating and 48% in mixed neuropathies). In 68% of patients with vasculitic neuropathy, this etiology was already suspected, whereas in 32% nerve biopsy modified the clinical diagnosis. During the years, the number of annually performed biopsies decreased significantly (p = 0.007), with an increase in the mean age of patients (p < 0.0001). The percentage of hereditary neuropathies had a significant decrease (p = 0.016), while the rate of vasculitic and chronic inflammatory neuropathies increased (p < 0.0001). This is the largest Italian study addressing the yield of sural nerve biopsy. During the years, we observed a progressive refinement of the indication of this procedure, which confirms its utility for interstitial neuropathies, particularly if non-systemic vasculitic neuropathy is suspected.
topic sural nerve biopsy
vasculitic neuropathy
amyloidotic neuropathy
neuropathy
axonal neuropathies
demyelinating neuropathies
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2019.01218/full
work_keys_str_mv AT valeriaprada diagnosticvalueofsuralnervebiopsyretrospectiveanalysisofclinicalcasesfrom1981to2017
AT saramassucco diagnosticvalueofsuralnervebiopsyretrospectiveanalysisofclinicalcasesfrom1981to2017
AT consueloventuri diagnosticvalueofsuralnervebiopsyretrospectiveanalysisofclinicalcasesfrom1981to2017
AT alessandrogeroldi diagnosticvalueofsuralnervebiopsyretrospectiveanalysisofclinicalcasesfrom1981to2017
AT alessandrogeroldi diagnosticvalueofsuralnervebiopsyretrospectiveanalysisofclinicalcasesfrom1981to2017
AT emiliabellone diagnosticvalueofsuralnervebiopsyretrospectiveanalysisofclinicalcasesfrom1981to2017
AT emiliabellone diagnosticvalueofsuralnervebiopsyretrospectiveanalysisofclinicalcasesfrom1981to2017
AT paolamandich diagnosticvalueofsuralnervebiopsyretrospectiveanalysisofclinicalcasesfrom1981to2017
AT paolamandich diagnosticvalueofsuralnervebiopsyretrospectiveanalysisofclinicalcasesfrom1981to2017
AT micheleminuto diagnosticvalueofsuralnervebiopsyretrospectiveanalysisofclinicalcasesfrom1981to2017
AT micheleminuto diagnosticvalueofsuralnervebiopsyretrospectiveanalysisofclinicalcasesfrom1981to2017
AT emanuelavaraldo diagnosticvalueofsuralnervebiopsyretrospectiveanalysisofclinicalcasesfrom1981to2017
AT emanuelavaraldo diagnosticvalueofsuralnervebiopsyretrospectiveanalysisofclinicalcasesfrom1981to2017
AT giovannimancardi diagnosticvalueofsuralnervebiopsyretrospectiveanalysisofclinicalcasesfrom1981to2017
AT giovannimancardi diagnosticvalueofsuralnervebiopsyretrospectiveanalysisofclinicalcasesfrom1981to2017
AT marinagrandis diagnosticvalueofsuralnervebiopsyretrospectiveanalysisofclinicalcasesfrom1981to2017
AT marinagrandis diagnosticvalueofsuralnervebiopsyretrospectiveanalysisofclinicalcasesfrom1981to2017
AT angeloschenone diagnosticvalueofsuralnervebiopsyretrospectiveanalysisofclinicalcasesfrom1981to2017
AT angeloschenone diagnosticvalueofsuralnervebiopsyretrospectiveanalysisofclinicalcasesfrom1981to2017
_version_ 1724752933069783040
spelling doaj-ee90335d366a48b69ffe18b348374fe02020-11-25T02:47:32ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952019-11-011010.3389/fneur.2019.01218489086Diagnostic Value of Sural Nerve Biopsy: Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Cases From 1981 to 2017Valeria Prada0Sara Massucco1Consuelo Venturi2Alessandro Geroldi3Alessandro Geroldi4Emilia Bellone5Emilia Bellone6Paola Mandich7Paola Mandich8Michele Minuto9Michele Minuto10Emanuela Varaldo11Emanuela Varaldo12Giovanni Mancardi13Giovanni Mancardi14Marina Grandis15Marina Grandis16Angelo Schenone17Angelo Schenone18Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal/Child Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, ItalyDepartment of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal/Child Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, ItalyDepartment of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal/Child Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, ItalyDepartment of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal/Child Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, ItalyDepartment of Neurology, Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genoa, ItalyDepartment of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal/Child Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, ItalyDepartment of Neurology, Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genoa, ItalyDepartment of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal/Child Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, ItalyDepartment of Neurology, Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genoa, ItalyDepartment of Surgical Sciences (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, ItalyDepartment of Surgery, Policlinico San Martino IRCSS, Genoa, ItalyDepartment of Surgical Sciences (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, ItalyDepartment of Surgery, Policlinico San Martino IRCSS, Genoa, ItalyDepartment of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal/Child Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, ItalyFondazione Maugeri ICS, Genova, ItalyDepartment of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal/Child Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, ItalyDepartment of Neurology, Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genoa, ItalyDepartment of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal/Child Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, ItalyDepartment of Neurology, Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genoa, ItalyNerve biopsy represents the conclusive step in the diagnostic work-up of peripheral neuropathies, and its diagnostic yield is still debated. The aim of this study is to consider the impact of nerve biopsy on reaching a useful diagnosis in different peripheral neuropathies and its changing over time. We retrospectively analyzed 1,179 sural nerve biopsies performed in the period 1981–2017 at Neurological Clinic of Policlinico San Martino (Genoa). We relied on medical records and collected both clinical and pathological data in a database. Biopsy provided univocal diagnoses in 53% of cases (with an increase over time), multiple diagnostic options in 14%, while diagnosis was undetermined in 33% (undetermined reports decreased during the years). In 57% of patients, the pre-biopsy suspicion was confirmed, while in 43% sural biopsy modified the clinical diagnosis. The highest yield was in axonal neuropathies (29% undetermined reports vs. 40% in demyelinating and 48% in mixed neuropathies). In 68% of patients with vasculitic neuropathy, this etiology was already suspected, whereas in 32% nerve biopsy modified the clinical diagnosis. During the years, the number of annually performed biopsies decreased significantly (p = 0.007), with an increase in the mean age of patients (p < 0.0001). The percentage of hereditary neuropathies had a significant decrease (p = 0.016), while the rate of vasculitic and chronic inflammatory neuropathies increased (p < 0.0001). This is the largest Italian study addressing the yield of sural nerve biopsy. During the years, we observed a progressive refinement of the indication of this procedure, which confirms its utility for interstitial neuropathies, particularly if non-systemic vasculitic neuropathy is suspected.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2019.01218/fullsural nerve biopsyvasculitic neuropathyamyloidotic neuropathyneuropathyaxonal neuropathiesdemyelinating neuropathies