Outcomes of Lymphovenous Anastomosis for Upper Extremity Lymphedema: A Systematic Review

Background:. Lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) is an accepted microsurgical treatment for lymphedema of the upper extremity (UE). This study summarizes and analyzes recent data on the outcomes associated with LVA for UE lymphedema at varying degrees of severity. Methods:. A literature search was conduc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nikita Gupta, BS, Erik M. Verhey, BS, Ricardo A. Torres-Guzman, MD, Francisco R. Avila, MD, Antonio Jorge Forte, MD, PhD, Alanna M. Rebecca, MD, MBA, Chad M. Teven, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2021-08-01
Series:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003770
id doaj-eebfbde73c344a07871b60a0ee10fdf8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eebfbde73c344a07871b60a0ee10fdf82021-09-28T10:19:02ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742021-08-0198e377010.1097/GOX.0000000000003770202108000-00054Outcomes of Lymphovenous Anastomosis for Upper Extremity Lymphedema: A Systematic ReviewNikita Gupta, BS0Erik M. Verhey, BS1Ricardo A. Torres-Guzman, MD2Francisco R. Avila, MD3Antonio Jorge Forte, MD, PhD4Alanna M. Rebecca, MD, MBA5Chad M. Teven, MD6From the * Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, Ariz.† University of Notre Dame, Department of Biological Sciences, Notre Dame, Ind.‡ Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla.‡ Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla.‡ Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla.‡ Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla.§ Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz.Background:. Lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) is an accepted microsurgical treatment for lymphedema of the upper extremity (UE). This study summarizes and analyzes recent data on the outcomes associated with LVA for UE lymphedema at varying degrees of severity. Methods:. A literature search was conducted in the PubMed database to extract articles published through June 19, 2020. Studies reporting data on postoperative improvement in limb circumference/volume or subjective improvement in quality of life for patients with primary or secondary lymphedema of the UE were included. Extracted data consisted of demographic data, number of patients and upper limbs, duration of symptoms before LVA, surgical technique, follow-up, and objective and subjective outcomes. Results:. A total of 92 articles were identified, of which 16 studies were eligible for final inclusion comprising a total of 349 patients and 244 upper limbs. The average age of patients ranged from 38.4 to 64 years. The duration of lymphedema before LVA ranged from 9 months to 7 years. The mean length of follow-up ranged from 6 months to 8 years. Fourteen studies reported an objective improvement in limb circumference or volume measurements following LVA, ranging from 0% to 100%. Patients included had varying severity of lymphedema, ranging from Campisi stage I to IV. The maximal improvement in objective measurements was found in patients with lower stage lymphedema. Conclusion:. LVA is a safe, effective technique for the treatment of UE lymphedema refractory to decompressive treatment. Results of LVA indicate greater efficacy in earlier stages of lymphedema before advanced lymphatic sclerosis.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003770
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nikita Gupta, BS
Erik M. Verhey, BS
Ricardo A. Torres-Guzman, MD
Francisco R. Avila, MD
Antonio Jorge Forte, MD, PhD
Alanna M. Rebecca, MD, MBA
Chad M. Teven, MD
spellingShingle Nikita Gupta, BS
Erik M. Verhey, BS
Ricardo A. Torres-Guzman, MD
Francisco R. Avila, MD
Antonio Jorge Forte, MD, PhD
Alanna M. Rebecca, MD, MBA
Chad M. Teven, MD
Outcomes of Lymphovenous Anastomosis for Upper Extremity Lymphedema: A Systematic Review
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
author_facet Nikita Gupta, BS
Erik M. Verhey, BS
Ricardo A. Torres-Guzman, MD
Francisco R. Avila, MD
Antonio Jorge Forte, MD, PhD
Alanna M. Rebecca, MD, MBA
Chad M. Teven, MD
author_sort Nikita Gupta, BS
title Outcomes of Lymphovenous Anastomosis for Upper Extremity Lymphedema: A Systematic Review
title_short Outcomes of Lymphovenous Anastomosis for Upper Extremity Lymphedema: A Systematic Review
title_full Outcomes of Lymphovenous Anastomosis for Upper Extremity Lymphedema: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Outcomes of Lymphovenous Anastomosis for Upper Extremity Lymphedema: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of Lymphovenous Anastomosis for Upper Extremity Lymphedema: A Systematic Review
title_sort outcomes of lymphovenous anastomosis for upper extremity lymphedema: a systematic review
publisher Wolters Kluwer
series Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
issn 2169-7574
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Background:. Lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) is an accepted microsurgical treatment for lymphedema of the upper extremity (UE). This study summarizes and analyzes recent data on the outcomes associated with LVA for UE lymphedema at varying degrees of severity. Methods:. A literature search was conducted in the PubMed database to extract articles published through June 19, 2020. Studies reporting data on postoperative improvement in limb circumference/volume or subjective improvement in quality of life for patients with primary or secondary lymphedema of the UE were included. Extracted data consisted of demographic data, number of patients and upper limbs, duration of symptoms before LVA, surgical technique, follow-up, and objective and subjective outcomes. Results:. A total of 92 articles were identified, of which 16 studies were eligible for final inclusion comprising a total of 349 patients and 244 upper limbs. The average age of patients ranged from 38.4 to 64 years. The duration of lymphedema before LVA ranged from 9 months to 7 years. The mean length of follow-up ranged from 6 months to 8 years. Fourteen studies reported an objective improvement in limb circumference or volume measurements following LVA, ranging from 0% to 100%. Patients included had varying severity of lymphedema, ranging from Campisi stage I to IV. The maximal improvement in objective measurements was found in patients with lower stage lymphedema. Conclusion:. LVA is a safe, effective technique for the treatment of UE lymphedema refractory to decompressive treatment. Results of LVA indicate greater efficacy in earlier stages of lymphedema before advanced lymphatic sclerosis.
url http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003770
work_keys_str_mv AT nikitaguptabs outcomesoflymphovenousanastomosisforupperextremitylymphedemaasystematicreview
AT erikmverheybs outcomesoflymphovenousanastomosisforupperextremitylymphedemaasystematicreview
AT ricardoatorresguzmanmd outcomesoflymphovenousanastomosisforupperextremitylymphedemaasystematicreview
AT franciscoravilamd outcomesoflymphovenousanastomosisforupperextremitylymphedemaasystematicreview
AT antoniojorgefortemdphd outcomesoflymphovenousanastomosisforupperextremitylymphedemaasystematicreview
AT alannamrebeccamdmba outcomesoflymphovenousanastomosisforupperextremitylymphedemaasystematicreview
AT chadmtevenmd outcomesoflymphovenousanastomosisforupperextremitylymphedemaasystematicreview
_version_ 1716866292270497792