A meta-analysis of parental smoking and the risk of childhood brain tumors.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies regarding the association between parental smoking and the risk of childhood brain tumors (CBT) have reported inconsistent results. We performed a meta-analysis to summarize evidence on this association and to quantify the potential dose-response relationship. METHODS: A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yi Huang, Jianrong Huang, Huan Lan, GuanYan Zhao, ChunZhen Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4109951?pdf=render
id doaj-eee2cc689d934606ab6282826e9c29f7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eee2cc689d934606ab6282826e9c29f72020-11-25T01:13:25ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0197e10291010.1371/journal.pone.0102910A meta-analysis of parental smoking and the risk of childhood brain tumors.Yi HuangJianrong HuangHuan LanGuanYan ZhaoChunZhen HuangOBJECTIVE: Previous studies regarding the association between parental smoking and the risk of childhood brain tumors (CBT) have reported inconsistent results. We performed a meta-analysis to summarize evidence on this association and to quantify the potential dose-response relationship. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in the Medline and Embase databases. The summary relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Dose-response meta-analysis was also performed for studies that reported categorical risk estimates for a series of smoking exposure levels. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In the meta-analyses, the summary RRs (95% CIs) of CBT for maternal smoking during pregnancy, paternal smoking during pregnancy, maternal smoking before pregnancy, and paternal smoking before pregnancy were 0.96 (0.86-1.07), 1.09 (0.97-1.22), 0.93 (0.85-1.00), and 1.09 (1.00-1.20), respectively. Dose-response meta-analysis also showed no significant association between parental smoking and the risk of CBT. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from our meta-analysis indicate that parental smoking may not be associated with a risk of CBT.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4109951?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yi Huang
Jianrong Huang
Huan Lan
GuanYan Zhao
ChunZhen Huang
spellingShingle Yi Huang
Jianrong Huang
Huan Lan
GuanYan Zhao
ChunZhen Huang
A meta-analysis of parental smoking and the risk of childhood brain tumors.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Yi Huang
Jianrong Huang
Huan Lan
GuanYan Zhao
ChunZhen Huang
author_sort Yi Huang
title A meta-analysis of parental smoking and the risk of childhood brain tumors.
title_short A meta-analysis of parental smoking and the risk of childhood brain tumors.
title_full A meta-analysis of parental smoking and the risk of childhood brain tumors.
title_fullStr A meta-analysis of parental smoking and the risk of childhood brain tumors.
title_full_unstemmed A meta-analysis of parental smoking and the risk of childhood brain tumors.
title_sort meta-analysis of parental smoking and the risk of childhood brain tumors.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description OBJECTIVE: Previous studies regarding the association between parental smoking and the risk of childhood brain tumors (CBT) have reported inconsistent results. We performed a meta-analysis to summarize evidence on this association and to quantify the potential dose-response relationship. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in the Medline and Embase databases. The summary relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Dose-response meta-analysis was also performed for studies that reported categorical risk estimates for a series of smoking exposure levels. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In the meta-analyses, the summary RRs (95% CIs) of CBT for maternal smoking during pregnancy, paternal smoking during pregnancy, maternal smoking before pregnancy, and paternal smoking before pregnancy were 0.96 (0.86-1.07), 1.09 (0.97-1.22), 0.93 (0.85-1.00), and 1.09 (1.00-1.20), respectively. Dose-response meta-analysis also showed no significant association between parental smoking and the risk of CBT. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from our meta-analysis indicate that parental smoking may not be associated with a risk of CBT.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4109951?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT yihuang ametaanalysisofparentalsmokingandtheriskofchildhoodbraintumors
AT jianronghuang ametaanalysisofparentalsmokingandtheriskofchildhoodbraintumors
AT huanlan ametaanalysisofparentalsmokingandtheriskofchildhoodbraintumors
AT guanyanzhao ametaanalysisofparentalsmokingandtheriskofchildhoodbraintumors
AT chunzhenhuang ametaanalysisofparentalsmokingandtheriskofchildhoodbraintumors
AT yihuang metaanalysisofparentalsmokingandtheriskofchildhoodbraintumors
AT jianronghuang metaanalysisofparentalsmokingandtheriskofchildhoodbraintumors
AT huanlan metaanalysisofparentalsmokingandtheriskofchildhoodbraintumors
AT guanyanzhao metaanalysisofparentalsmokingandtheriskofchildhoodbraintumors
AT chunzhenhuang metaanalysisofparentalsmokingandtheriskofchildhoodbraintumors
_version_ 1725162385022386176