Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Can Benefit the Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients With Clinically Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node

Background and PurposeThe optimal treatment modality for clinically positive lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) from locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is unknown. Thus, we aimed to analyze the optimal radiotherapy dose for clinically positive LPLN from LARC.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shuai Li, Yangzi Zhang, Yang Yu, Xianggao Zhu, Jianhao Geng, Huajing Teng, Zhilong Wang, Tingting Sun, Lin Wang, Hongzhi Wang, Yongheng Li, Aiwen Wu, Yong Cai, Weihu Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2020.627572/full
id doaj-eee558f8fcbb4bbaa649a24f02392d2f
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shuai Li
Yangzi Zhang
Yang Yu
Xianggao Zhu
Jianhao Geng
Huajing Teng
Zhilong Wang
Tingting Sun
Lin Wang
Hongzhi Wang
Yongheng Li
Aiwen Wu
Yong Cai
Weihu Wang
spellingShingle Shuai Li
Yangzi Zhang
Yang Yu
Xianggao Zhu
Jianhao Geng
Huajing Teng
Zhilong Wang
Tingting Sun
Lin Wang
Hongzhi Wang
Yongheng Li
Aiwen Wu
Yong Cai
Weihu Wang
Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Can Benefit the Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients With Clinically Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node
Frontiers in Oncology
simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy
neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
lateral pelvic lymph node
local advanced rectal cancer
regrowth rate
disease-free survival
author_facet Shuai Li
Yangzi Zhang
Yang Yu
Xianggao Zhu
Jianhao Geng
Huajing Teng
Zhilong Wang
Tingting Sun
Lin Wang
Hongzhi Wang
Yongheng Li
Aiwen Wu
Yong Cai
Weihu Wang
author_sort Shuai Li
title Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Can Benefit the Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients With Clinically Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node
title_short Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Can Benefit the Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients With Clinically Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node
title_full Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Can Benefit the Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients With Clinically Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node
title_fullStr Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Can Benefit the Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients With Clinically Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node
title_full_unstemmed Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Can Benefit the Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients With Clinically Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node
title_sort simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy can benefit the locally advanced rectal cancer patients with clinically positive lateral pelvic lymph node
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Oncology
issn 2234-943X
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Background and PurposeThe optimal treatment modality for clinically positive lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) from locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is unknown. Thus, we aimed to analyze the optimal radiotherapy dose for clinically positive LPLN from LARC.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated distal LARC (i.e., within 8 cm from the anal verge) patients with clinically positive LPLN (i.e., ≥7 mm in the short axis). They were divided into two groups based on whether or not they received simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT)–based chemoradiotherapy. The total radiotherapy dose on LPLN were 56-60Gy for SIB-IMRT group and 41.8Gy for non-SIB-IMRT group. The clinical parameters and regrowth rate of LPLN were then compared between the two groups.ResultsA total of 151 patients were evaluated, and 83 and 68 patients were classified to the SIB-IMRT and non-SIB-IMRT group, respectively. The median follow-up period was 22.6 months, and the 2-year LPLN regrowth rate was significantly different between the SIB-IMRT group and the non-SIB-IMRT group (0% vs 10.8%, P=0.024). Further, SIB-IMRT yielded a significantly lower 2-year LPLN regrowth rate in patients whose LPLN measured ≥8 mm in the short axis (0% vs. 15.9%, P=0.019) or ≥10 mm in the long axis (0% vs. 17.6%, P=0.024) compared to patients who were in non-SIB-IMRT group. Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in grade II radiation-related toxicity (30.1% vs. 39.1%, P=0.217) and surgical complications (21.8% vs. 12.2%, P=0.198) between the two groups.ConclusionSIB-IMRT–based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is beneficial for eliminating clinically positive LPLN from LARC without increasing the incidence of radiotherapy-related toxicity and surgical complications, and patients with larger LPLN may gain benefit from this technique.
topic simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy
neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
lateral pelvic lymph node
local advanced rectal cancer
regrowth rate
disease-free survival
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2020.627572/full
work_keys_str_mv AT shuaili simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode
AT yangzizhang simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode
AT yangyu simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode
AT xianggaozhu simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode
AT jianhaogeng simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode
AT huajingteng simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode
AT zhilongwang simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode
AT tingtingsun simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode
AT linwang simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode
AT hongzhiwang simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode
AT yonghengli simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode
AT aiwenwu simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode
AT yongcai simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode
AT weihuwang simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode
_version_ 1724257069364674560
spelling doaj-eee558f8fcbb4bbaa649a24f02392d2f2021-02-22T05:01:17ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2021-02-011010.3389/fonc.2020.627572627572Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Can Benefit the Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients With Clinically Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph NodeShuai Li0Yangzi Zhang1Yang Yu2Xianggao Zhu3Jianhao Geng4Huajing Teng5Zhilong Wang6Tingting Sun7Lin Wang8Hongzhi Wang9Yongheng Li10Aiwen Wu11Yong Cai12Weihu Wang13Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, ChinaBackground and PurposeThe optimal treatment modality for clinically positive lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) from locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is unknown. Thus, we aimed to analyze the optimal radiotherapy dose for clinically positive LPLN from LARC.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated distal LARC (i.e., within 8 cm from the anal verge) patients with clinically positive LPLN (i.e., ≥7 mm in the short axis). They were divided into two groups based on whether or not they received simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT)–based chemoradiotherapy. The total radiotherapy dose on LPLN were 56-60Gy for SIB-IMRT group and 41.8Gy for non-SIB-IMRT group. The clinical parameters and regrowth rate of LPLN were then compared between the two groups.ResultsA total of 151 patients were evaluated, and 83 and 68 patients were classified to the SIB-IMRT and non-SIB-IMRT group, respectively. The median follow-up period was 22.6 months, and the 2-year LPLN regrowth rate was significantly different between the SIB-IMRT group and the non-SIB-IMRT group (0% vs 10.8%, P=0.024). Further, SIB-IMRT yielded a significantly lower 2-year LPLN regrowth rate in patients whose LPLN measured ≥8 mm in the short axis (0% vs. 15.9%, P=0.019) or ≥10 mm in the long axis (0% vs. 17.6%, P=0.024) compared to patients who were in non-SIB-IMRT group. Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in grade II radiation-related toxicity (30.1% vs. 39.1%, P=0.217) and surgical complications (21.8% vs. 12.2%, P=0.198) between the two groups.ConclusionSIB-IMRT–based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is beneficial for eliminating clinically positive LPLN from LARC without increasing the incidence of radiotherapy-related toxicity and surgical complications, and patients with larger LPLN may gain benefit from this technique.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2020.627572/fullsimultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapyneoadjuvant chemoradiotherapylateral pelvic lymph nodelocal advanced rectal cancerregrowth ratedisease-free survival