Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Can Benefit the Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients With Clinically Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node
Background and PurposeThe optimal treatment modality for clinically positive lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) from locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is unknown. Thus, we aimed to analyze the optimal radiotherapy dose for clinically positive LPLN from LARC.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Oncology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2020.627572/full |
id |
doaj-eee558f8fcbb4bbaa649a24f02392d2f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shuai Li Yangzi Zhang Yang Yu Xianggao Zhu Jianhao Geng Huajing Teng Zhilong Wang Tingting Sun Lin Wang Hongzhi Wang Yongheng Li Aiwen Wu Yong Cai Weihu Wang |
spellingShingle |
Shuai Li Yangzi Zhang Yang Yu Xianggao Zhu Jianhao Geng Huajing Teng Zhilong Wang Tingting Sun Lin Wang Hongzhi Wang Yongheng Li Aiwen Wu Yong Cai Weihu Wang Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Can Benefit the Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients With Clinically Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Frontiers in Oncology simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy lateral pelvic lymph node local advanced rectal cancer regrowth rate disease-free survival |
author_facet |
Shuai Li Yangzi Zhang Yang Yu Xianggao Zhu Jianhao Geng Huajing Teng Zhilong Wang Tingting Sun Lin Wang Hongzhi Wang Yongheng Li Aiwen Wu Yong Cai Weihu Wang |
author_sort |
Shuai Li |
title |
Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Can Benefit the Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients With Clinically Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node |
title_short |
Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Can Benefit the Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients With Clinically Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node |
title_full |
Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Can Benefit the Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients With Clinically Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node |
title_fullStr |
Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Can Benefit the Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients With Clinically Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node |
title_full_unstemmed |
Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Can Benefit the Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients With Clinically Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node |
title_sort |
simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy can benefit the locally advanced rectal cancer patients with clinically positive lateral pelvic lymph node |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Oncology |
issn |
2234-943X |
publishDate |
2021-02-01 |
description |
Background and PurposeThe optimal treatment modality for clinically positive lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) from locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is unknown. Thus, we aimed to analyze the optimal radiotherapy dose for clinically positive LPLN from LARC.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated distal LARC (i.e., within 8 cm from the anal verge) patients with clinically positive LPLN (i.e., ≥7 mm in the short axis). They were divided into two groups based on whether or not they received simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT)–based chemoradiotherapy. The total radiotherapy dose on LPLN were 56-60Gy for SIB-IMRT group and 41.8Gy for non-SIB-IMRT group. The clinical parameters and regrowth rate of LPLN were then compared between the two groups.ResultsA total of 151 patients were evaluated, and 83 and 68 patients were classified to the SIB-IMRT and non-SIB-IMRT group, respectively. The median follow-up period was 22.6 months, and the 2-year LPLN regrowth rate was significantly different between the SIB-IMRT group and the non-SIB-IMRT group (0% vs 10.8%, P=0.024). Further, SIB-IMRT yielded a significantly lower 2-year LPLN regrowth rate in patients whose LPLN measured ≥8 mm in the short axis (0% vs. 15.9%, P=0.019) or ≥10 mm in the long axis (0% vs. 17.6%, P=0.024) compared to patients who were in non-SIB-IMRT group. Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in grade II radiation-related toxicity (30.1% vs. 39.1%, P=0.217) and surgical complications (21.8% vs. 12.2%, P=0.198) between the two groups.ConclusionSIB-IMRT–based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is beneficial for eliminating clinically positive LPLN from LARC without increasing the incidence of radiotherapy-related toxicity and surgical complications, and patients with larger LPLN may gain benefit from this technique. |
topic |
simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy lateral pelvic lymph node local advanced rectal cancer regrowth rate disease-free survival |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2020.627572/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shuaili simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode AT yangzizhang simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode AT yangyu simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode AT xianggaozhu simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode AT jianhaogeng simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode AT huajingteng simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode AT zhilongwang simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode AT tingtingsun simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode AT linwang simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode AT hongzhiwang simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode AT yonghengli simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode AT aiwenwu simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode AT yongcai simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode AT weihuwang simultaneousintegratedboostintensitymodulatedradiationtherapycanbenefitthelocallyadvancedrectalcancerpatientswithclinicallypositivelateralpelviclymphnode |
_version_ |
1724257069364674560 |
spelling |
doaj-eee558f8fcbb4bbaa649a24f02392d2f2021-02-22T05:01:17ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2021-02-011010.3389/fonc.2020.627572627572Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Can Benefit the Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients With Clinically Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph NodeShuai Li0Yangzi Zhang1Yang Yu2Xianggao Zhu3Jianhao Geng4Huajing Teng5Zhilong Wang6Tingting Sun7Lin Wang8Hongzhi Wang9Yongheng Li10Aiwen Wu11Yong Cai12Weihu Wang13Department of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, ChinaBackground and PurposeThe optimal treatment modality for clinically positive lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) from locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is unknown. Thus, we aimed to analyze the optimal radiotherapy dose for clinically positive LPLN from LARC.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated distal LARC (i.e., within 8 cm from the anal verge) patients with clinically positive LPLN (i.e., ≥7 mm in the short axis). They were divided into two groups based on whether or not they received simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT)–based chemoradiotherapy. The total radiotherapy dose on LPLN were 56-60Gy for SIB-IMRT group and 41.8Gy for non-SIB-IMRT group. The clinical parameters and regrowth rate of LPLN were then compared between the two groups.ResultsA total of 151 patients were evaluated, and 83 and 68 patients were classified to the SIB-IMRT and non-SIB-IMRT group, respectively. The median follow-up period was 22.6 months, and the 2-year LPLN regrowth rate was significantly different between the SIB-IMRT group and the non-SIB-IMRT group (0% vs 10.8%, P=0.024). Further, SIB-IMRT yielded a significantly lower 2-year LPLN regrowth rate in patients whose LPLN measured ≥8 mm in the short axis (0% vs. 15.9%, P=0.019) or ≥10 mm in the long axis (0% vs. 17.6%, P=0.024) compared to patients who were in non-SIB-IMRT group. Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in grade II radiation-related toxicity (30.1% vs. 39.1%, P=0.217) and surgical complications (21.8% vs. 12.2%, P=0.198) between the two groups.ConclusionSIB-IMRT–based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is beneficial for eliminating clinically positive LPLN from LARC without increasing the incidence of radiotherapy-related toxicity and surgical complications, and patients with larger LPLN may gain benefit from this technique.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2020.627572/fullsimultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapyneoadjuvant chemoradiotherapylateral pelvic lymph nodelocal advanced rectal cancerregrowth ratedisease-free survival |