Las insurrecciones serviles en Sicilia. El relato de Diodoro Sículo y la participación de los campesinos libres

During the 20th century the study of the three great slave uprisings of the late Roman Republic has revolved around the debate related to the definition of their, “revolutionary” or “reformist” character, thus moving the contemporary imaginary of revolution to the ancient world. The western histori...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fernando Martín Piantanida
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad Nacional de La Plata 2011-12-01
Series:Sociedades Precapitalistas
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sociedadesprecapitalistas.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/article/view/2025
id doaj-eeed34f72d124f1aad7f7e936babedd5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eeed34f72d124f1aad7f7e936babedd52021-01-02T03:05:28ZengUniversidad Nacional de La PlataSociedades Precapitalistas2250-51212011-12-01211957Las insurrecciones serviles en Sicilia. El relato de Diodoro Sículo y la participación de los campesinos libresFernando Martín Piantanida0Universidad de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales. Universidad Nacional de La PlataDuring the 20th century the study of the three great slave uprisings of the late Roman Republic has revolved around the debate related to the definition of their, “revolutionary” or “reformist” character, thus moving the contemporary imaginary of revolution to the ancient world. The western historiography has shown a striking consensus: the slaves didn’t have the aim of abolishing slavery; their uprisings lacked of a revolutionary end, and therefore they were just “rebellions”. This work intends to reconsider the Sicilian servile insurrections narrated by Diodorus by taking distance from the traditional dichotomous emphasis (revolution - rebellion) and by focusing on a problematic that has been generally omitted or slightly considered by historiography, the participation and support of impoverished freemen in the servile revolts. We will prove this participation; we will define who these “poor free” were; we will support the historiographical line that postulates the existence of collaboration between rebel slaves and poor free men in the revolts, making emphasis in the assembly that congregates around the Enna theater in the beginning of the first insurrection; and we will suggest to think the action of the rebel slaves in the revolts by taking into account Hobsbawm’s concept of social banditshttp://www.sociedadesprecapitalistas.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/article/view/2025Esclavos rebeldeslibres pobrescolaboracióndêmosbandidos sociales
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fernando Martín Piantanida
spellingShingle Fernando Martín Piantanida
Las insurrecciones serviles en Sicilia. El relato de Diodoro Sículo y la participación de los campesinos libres
Sociedades Precapitalistas
Esclavos rebeldes
libres pobres
colaboración
dêmos
bandidos sociales
author_facet Fernando Martín Piantanida
author_sort Fernando Martín Piantanida
title Las insurrecciones serviles en Sicilia. El relato de Diodoro Sículo y la participación de los campesinos libres
title_short Las insurrecciones serviles en Sicilia. El relato de Diodoro Sículo y la participación de los campesinos libres
title_full Las insurrecciones serviles en Sicilia. El relato de Diodoro Sículo y la participación de los campesinos libres
title_fullStr Las insurrecciones serviles en Sicilia. El relato de Diodoro Sículo y la participación de los campesinos libres
title_full_unstemmed Las insurrecciones serviles en Sicilia. El relato de Diodoro Sículo y la participación de los campesinos libres
title_sort las insurrecciones serviles en sicilia. el relato de diodoro sículo y la participación de los campesinos libres
publisher Universidad Nacional de La Plata
series Sociedades Precapitalistas
issn 2250-5121
publishDate 2011-12-01
description During the 20th century the study of the three great slave uprisings of the late Roman Republic has revolved around the debate related to the definition of their, “revolutionary” or “reformist” character, thus moving the contemporary imaginary of revolution to the ancient world. The western historiography has shown a striking consensus: the slaves didn’t have the aim of abolishing slavery; their uprisings lacked of a revolutionary end, and therefore they were just “rebellions”. This work intends to reconsider the Sicilian servile insurrections narrated by Diodorus by taking distance from the traditional dichotomous emphasis (revolution - rebellion) and by focusing on a problematic that has been generally omitted or slightly considered by historiography, the participation and support of impoverished freemen in the servile revolts. We will prove this participation; we will define who these “poor free” were; we will support the historiographical line that postulates the existence of collaboration between rebel slaves and poor free men in the revolts, making emphasis in the assembly that congregates around the Enna theater in the beginning of the first insurrection; and we will suggest to think the action of the rebel slaves in the revolts by taking into account Hobsbawm’s concept of social bandits
topic Esclavos rebeldes
libres pobres
colaboración
dêmos
bandidos sociales
url http://www.sociedadesprecapitalistas.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/article/view/2025
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandomartinpiantanida lasinsurreccionesservilesensiciliaelrelatodediodorosiculoylaparticipaciondeloscampesinoslibres
_version_ 1724361498470383616