Stratosphere–troposphere separation of nitrogen dioxide columns from the TEMPO geostationary satellite instrument

• Main Authors: J. A. Geddes, R. V. Martin, E. J. Bucsela, C. A. McLinden, D. J. M. Cunningham
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-11-01
• Series: Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
• Online Access: https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/11/6271/2018/amt-11-6271-2018.pdf

<p>Separating the stratospheric and tropospheric contributions in satellite retrievals of atmospheric NO₂ column abundance is a crucial step in the interpretation and application of the satellite observations. A variety of stratosphere–troposphere separation algorithms have been developed for sun-synchronous instruments in low Earth orbit (LEO) that benefit from global coverage, including broad clean regions with negligible tropospheric NO₂ compared to stratospheric NO₂. These global sun-synchronous algorithms need to be evaluated and refined for forthcoming geostationary instruments focused on continental regions, which lack this global context and require hourly estimates of the stratospheric column. Here we develop and assess a spatial filtering algorithm for the upcoming TEMPO geostationary instrument that will target North America. Developments include using independent satellite observations to identify likely locations of tropospheric enhancements, using independent LEO observations for spatial context, consideration of diurnally varying partial fields of regard, and a filter based on stratospheric to tropospheric air mass factor ratios. We test the algorithm with LEO observations from the OMI instrument with an afternoon overpass, and from the GOME-2 instrument with a morning overpass.</p><p>We compare our TEMPO field of regard algorithm against an identical global algorithm to investigate the penalty resulting from the limited spatial coverage in geostationary orbit, and find excellent agreement in the estimated mean daily tropospheric NO₂ column densities (<i>R</i>² = 0.999, slope = 1.009 for July and <i>R</i>² = 0.998, slope = 0.999 for January). The algorithm performs well even when only small parts of the continent are observed by TEMPO. The algorithm is challenged the most by east coast morning retrievals in the wintertime (e.g., <i>R</i>² = 0.995, slope = 1.038 at 14:00&thinsp;UTC). We find independent global LEO observations (corrected for time of day) provide important context near the field-of-regard edges. We also test the performance of the TEMPO algorithm without these supporting global observations. Most of the continent is unaffected (<i>R</i>² = 0.924 and slope = 0.973 for July and <i>R</i>² = 0.996 and slope = 1.008 for January), with 90&thinsp;% of the pixels having differences of less than ±0.2×10¹⁵&thinsp;molecules cm⁻² between the TEMPO tropospheric NO₂ column density and the global algorithm. For near-real-time retrieval, even a climatological estimate of the stratospheric NO₂ surrounding the field of regard would improve this agreement. In general, the additional penalty of a limited field of regard from TEMPO introduces no more error than normally expected in most global stratosphere–troposphere separation algorithms. Overall, we conclude that hourly near-real-time stratosphere–troposphere separation for the retrieval of NO₂ tropospheric column densities by the TEMPO geostationary instrument is both feasible and robust, regardless of the diurnally varying limited field of regard.</p>