Can We Speak of Cyclicity in the Evolution of Languages ? The Concept of “Deflexivity” in the Typological Evolution of the Romance Languages, the Examples of French, Italian and Romanian

This article proposes a reflection on the use of the concept of "deflexivity" as part of the typological evolution of Romance languages in order to identify more general assumptions in the field of diachrony. It is not a universalist point of view insofar as Gustave William himself, the in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Louis BEGIONI
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Vasile Goldis Western University, Arad 2012-01-01
Series:Studii de Stiinta si Cultura
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.revista-studii-uvvg.ro/images/stories/30/1.%20Articol%20Louis%20Begioni.pdf
id doaj-ef032f0571384cb981fdf456a6a7bf76
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ef032f0571384cb981fdf456a6a7bf762020-11-25T00:58:00ZdeuVasile Goldis Western University, AradStudii de Stiinta si Cultura1841-14012067-51352012-01-01VIII3 (30)714Can We Speak of Cyclicity in the Evolution of Languages ? The Concept of “Deflexivity” in the Typological Evolution of the Romance Languages, the Examples of French, Italian and RomanianLouis BEGIONIThis article proposes a reflection on the use of the concept of "deflexivity" as part of the typological evolution of Romance languages in order to identify more general assumptions in the field of diachrony. It is not a universalist point of view insofar as Gustave William himself, the inventor of this concept, also created the concept of symmetrical “inflexity” representing all inverse operations. In our study, we limited ourselves to the analysis of deflexivity in Romance languages, particularly French, Italian and Romanian, our ultimate goal is to raise the general issues relating to the development of typological languages. For this, we compared the diachronic evolution of French and Italian by some references to Romanian to highlight points of convergence and the largest differences in particular characteristics of a typological perspective.http://www.revista-studii-uvvg.ro/images/stories/30/1.%20Articol%20Louis%20Begioni.pdfgeneral linguisticstypological linguisticslinguistics of Romance languageshistoric linguisticscomparative linguisticspsychomecanics of language.
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Louis BEGIONI
spellingShingle Louis BEGIONI
Can We Speak of Cyclicity in the Evolution of Languages ? The Concept of “Deflexivity” in the Typological Evolution of the Romance Languages, the Examples of French, Italian and Romanian
Studii de Stiinta si Cultura
general linguistics
typological linguistics
linguistics of Romance languages
historic linguistics
comparative linguistics
psychomecanics of language.
author_facet Louis BEGIONI
author_sort Louis BEGIONI
title Can We Speak of Cyclicity in the Evolution of Languages ? The Concept of “Deflexivity” in the Typological Evolution of the Romance Languages, the Examples of French, Italian and Romanian
title_short Can We Speak of Cyclicity in the Evolution of Languages ? The Concept of “Deflexivity” in the Typological Evolution of the Romance Languages, the Examples of French, Italian and Romanian
title_full Can We Speak of Cyclicity in the Evolution of Languages ? The Concept of “Deflexivity” in the Typological Evolution of the Romance Languages, the Examples of French, Italian and Romanian
title_fullStr Can We Speak of Cyclicity in the Evolution of Languages ? The Concept of “Deflexivity” in the Typological Evolution of the Romance Languages, the Examples of French, Italian and Romanian
title_full_unstemmed Can We Speak of Cyclicity in the Evolution of Languages ? The Concept of “Deflexivity” in the Typological Evolution of the Romance Languages, the Examples of French, Italian and Romanian
title_sort can we speak of cyclicity in the evolution of languages ? the concept of “deflexivity” in the typological evolution of the romance languages, the examples of french, italian and romanian
publisher Vasile Goldis Western University, Arad
series Studii de Stiinta si Cultura
issn 1841-1401
2067-5135
publishDate 2012-01-01
description This article proposes a reflection on the use of the concept of "deflexivity" as part of the typological evolution of Romance languages in order to identify more general assumptions in the field of diachrony. It is not a universalist point of view insofar as Gustave William himself, the inventor of this concept, also created the concept of symmetrical “inflexity” representing all inverse operations. In our study, we limited ourselves to the analysis of deflexivity in Romance languages, particularly French, Italian and Romanian, our ultimate goal is to raise the general issues relating to the development of typological languages. For this, we compared the diachronic evolution of French and Italian by some references to Romanian to highlight points of convergence and the largest differences in particular characteristics of a typological perspective.
topic general linguistics
typological linguistics
linguistics of Romance languages
historic linguistics
comparative linguistics
psychomecanics of language.
url http://www.revista-studii-uvvg.ro/images/stories/30/1.%20Articol%20Louis%20Begioni.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT louisbegioni canwespeakofcyclicityintheevolutionoflanguagestheconceptofdeflexivityinthetypologicalevolutionoftheromancelanguagestheexamplesoffrenchitalianandromanian
_version_ 1725221729697005568