A Review of Studies Evaluating Insecticide Barrier Treatments for Mosquito Control From 1944 to 2018

Background and Purpose: Barrier insecticide treatments have a long history in mosquito control programs but have been used more frequently in the United States in recent years for control of invasive “backyard” species (eg, Aedes albopictus ) and increases in incidence of vector-borne diseases (eg,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Craig A Stoops, Whitney A Qualls, Thuy-Vi T Nguyen, Stephanie L Richards
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-06-01
Series:Environmental Health Insights
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1178630219859004
id doaj-ef4b8b92c4e346bebb5cf2b8df17d5f2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ef4b8b92c4e346bebb5cf2b8df17d5f22020-11-25T03:24:17ZengSAGE PublishingEnvironmental Health Insights1178-63022019-06-011310.1177/1178630219859004A Review of Studies Evaluating Insecticide Barrier Treatments for Mosquito Control From 1944 to 2018Craig A Stoops0Whitney A Qualls1Thuy-Vi T Nguyen2Stephanie L Richards3Mosquito Authority Laboratories, Green Cove Springs, FL, USAZoonosis Control Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, TX, USAVector-Borne and Zoonotic Disease Team, Georgia Department of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USADepartment of Health Education and Promotion, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USABackground and Purpose: Barrier insecticide treatments have a long history in mosquito control programs but have been used more frequently in the United States in recent years for control of invasive “backyard” species (eg, Aedes albopictus ) and increases in incidence of vector-borne diseases (eg, Zika). Methods: We reviewed the published literature for studies investigating barrier treatments for mosquito control during the last 74 years (1944-2018). We searched databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to retrieve worldwide literature on barrier treatments. Results: Forty-four studies that evaluated 20 active ingredients (AIs) and 21 formulated products against multiple mosquito species are included. Insecticides investigated for efficacy included organochlorines (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane [DDT], β-hexachlorocyclohexane [BHC]), organophosphates (malathion), and pyrethroids (bifenthrin, deltamethrin, permethrin, lambda-cyhalothrin) as AIs. Study design varied with multiple methods used to evaluate effectiveness of barrier treatments. Barrier treatments were effective at lowering mosquito populations although there was variation between studies and for different mosquito species. Factors other than AI, such as exposure to rainfall and application equipment used, also influenced control efficacy. Conclusions: Many of the basic questions on the effectiveness of barrier insecticide applications have been answered, but several important details still must be investigated to improve precision and impact on vector-borne pathogen transmission. Recommendations are made to assist future evaluations of barrier treatments for mosquito control and to limit the potential development of insecticide resistance.https://doi.org/10.1177/1178630219859004
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Craig A Stoops
Whitney A Qualls
Thuy-Vi T Nguyen
Stephanie L Richards
spellingShingle Craig A Stoops
Whitney A Qualls
Thuy-Vi T Nguyen
Stephanie L Richards
A Review of Studies Evaluating Insecticide Barrier Treatments for Mosquito Control From 1944 to 2018
Environmental Health Insights
author_facet Craig A Stoops
Whitney A Qualls
Thuy-Vi T Nguyen
Stephanie L Richards
author_sort Craig A Stoops
title A Review of Studies Evaluating Insecticide Barrier Treatments for Mosquito Control From 1944 to 2018
title_short A Review of Studies Evaluating Insecticide Barrier Treatments for Mosquito Control From 1944 to 2018
title_full A Review of Studies Evaluating Insecticide Barrier Treatments for Mosquito Control From 1944 to 2018
title_fullStr A Review of Studies Evaluating Insecticide Barrier Treatments for Mosquito Control From 1944 to 2018
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Studies Evaluating Insecticide Barrier Treatments for Mosquito Control From 1944 to 2018
title_sort review of studies evaluating insecticide barrier treatments for mosquito control from 1944 to 2018
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Environmental Health Insights
issn 1178-6302
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Background and Purpose: Barrier insecticide treatments have a long history in mosquito control programs but have been used more frequently in the United States in recent years for control of invasive “backyard” species (eg, Aedes albopictus ) and increases in incidence of vector-borne diseases (eg, Zika). Methods: We reviewed the published literature for studies investigating barrier treatments for mosquito control during the last 74 years (1944-2018). We searched databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to retrieve worldwide literature on barrier treatments. Results: Forty-four studies that evaluated 20 active ingredients (AIs) and 21 formulated products against multiple mosquito species are included. Insecticides investigated for efficacy included organochlorines (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane [DDT], β-hexachlorocyclohexane [BHC]), organophosphates (malathion), and pyrethroids (bifenthrin, deltamethrin, permethrin, lambda-cyhalothrin) as AIs. Study design varied with multiple methods used to evaluate effectiveness of barrier treatments. Barrier treatments were effective at lowering mosquito populations although there was variation between studies and for different mosquito species. Factors other than AI, such as exposure to rainfall and application equipment used, also influenced control efficacy. Conclusions: Many of the basic questions on the effectiveness of barrier insecticide applications have been answered, but several important details still must be investigated to improve precision and impact on vector-borne pathogen transmission. Recommendations are made to assist future evaluations of barrier treatments for mosquito control and to limit the potential development of insecticide resistance.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1178630219859004
work_keys_str_mv AT craigastoops areviewofstudiesevaluatinginsecticidebarriertreatmentsformosquitocontrolfrom1944to2018
AT whitneyaqualls areviewofstudiesevaluatinginsecticidebarriertreatmentsformosquitocontrolfrom1944to2018
AT thuyvitnguyen areviewofstudiesevaluatinginsecticidebarriertreatmentsformosquitocontrolfrom1944to2018
AT stephanielrichards areviewofstudiesevaluatinginsecticidebarriertreatmentsformosquitocontrolfrom1944to2018
AT craigastoops reviewofstudiesevaluatinginsecticidebarriertreatmentsformosquitocontrolfrom1944to2018
AT whitneyaqualls reviewofstudiesevaluatinginsecticidebarriertreatmentsformosquitocontrolfrom1944to2018
AT thuyvitnguyen reviewofstudiesevaluatinginsecticidebarriertreatmentsformosquitocontrolfrom1944to2018
AT stephanielrichards reviewofstudiesevaluatinginsecticidebarriertreatmentsformosquitocontrolfrom1944to2018
_version_ 1724602298064175104