Cell Type-Associated Differences in Migration, Survival, and Immunogenicity following Grafting in CNS Tissue

Cell transplantation has been suggested to display several neuroprotective and/or neuroregenerative effects in animal models of central nervous system (CNS) trauma. However, while most studies report on clinical observations, currently little is known regarding the actual fate of the cell population...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jelle Praet, Kristien Reekmans, Dan Lin, Nathalie De Vocht, Irene Bergwerf, Bart Tambuyzer, Jasmijn Daans, Niel Hens, Herman Goossens, Patrick Pauwels, Zwi Berneman, Annemie Van Der Linden, Peter Ponsaerts
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2012-09-01
Series:Cell Transplantation
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3727/096368912X636920
id doaj-ef78fda60bee4ea690bcd5e802793b6f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ef78fda60bee4ea690bcd5e802793b6f2020-11-25T03:27:18ZengSAGE PublishingCell Transplantation0963-68971555-38922012-09-012110.3727/096368912X636920Cell Type-Associated Differences in Migration, Survival, and Immunogenicity following Grafting in CNS TissueJelle Praet0Kristien Reekmans1Dan Lin2Nathalie De Vocht3Irene Bergwerf4Bart Tambuyzer5Jasmijn Daans6Niel Hens7Herman Goossens8Patrick Pauwels9Zwi Berneman10Annemie Van Der Linden11Peter Ponsaerts12BioImaging Laboratory, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumVaccine and Infectious Disease Institute (Vaxinfectio), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumCenter for Statistics, I-Biostat, University of Hasselt, Hasselt, BelgiumBioImaging Laboratory, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumBioImaging Laboratory, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumVaccine and Infectious Disease Institute (Vaxinfectio), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumVaccine and Infectious Disease Institute (Vaxinfectio), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumCenter for Statistics, I-Biostat, University of Hasselt, Hasselt, BelgiumVaccine and Infectious Disease Institute (Vaxinfectio), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumLaboratory of Pathology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumVaccine and Infectious Disease Institute (Vaxinfectio), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumBioImaging Laboratory, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumVaccine and Infectious Disease Institute (Vaxinfectio), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumCell transplantation has been suggested to display several neuroprotective and/or neuroregenerative effects in animal models of central nervous system (CNS) trauma. However, while most studies report on clinical observations, currently little is known regarding the actual fate of the cell populations grafted and whether or how the brain's innate immune system, mainly directed by activated microglia and astrocytes, interacts with autologous cellular implants. In this study, we grafted well-characterized neural stem cell, mouse embryonic fibroblast, dendritic cell, bone marrow mononuclear cell, and splenocyte populations, all isolated or cultured from C57BL/6-eGFP transgenic mice, below the capsula externa (CE) of healthy C57BL/6 mice and below the inflamed/demyelinated CE of cuprizone-treated C57BL/6 mice. Two weeks postgrafting, an extensive quantitative multicolor histological analysis was performed in order (i) to quantify cell graft localization, migration, survival, and toxicity and (ii) to characterize endogenous CNS immune responses against the different cell grafts. Obtained results indicate dependence on the cell type grafted: (i) a different degree of cell graft migration, survival, and toxicity and (ii) a different organization of the endogenous immune response. Based on these observations, we warrant that further research should be undertaken to understand—and eventually control—cell graft-induced tissue damage and activation of the brain's innate immune system. The latter will be inevitable before cell grafting in the CNS can be performed safely and successfully in clinical settings.https://doi.org/10.3727/096368912X636920
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jelle Praet
Kristien Reekmans
Dan Lin
Nathalie De Vocht
Irene Bergwerf
Bart Tambuyzer
Jasmijn Daans
Niel Hens
Herman Goossens
Patrick Pauwels
Zwi Berneman
Annemie Van Der Linden
Peter Ponsaerts
spellingShingle Jelle Praet
Kristien Reekmans
Dan Lin
Nathalie De Vocht
Irene Bergwerf
Bart Tambuyzer
Jasmijn Daans
Niel Hens
Herman Goossens
Patrick Pauwels
Zwi Berneman
Annemie Van Der Linden
Peter Ponsaerts
Cell Type-Associated Differences in Migration, Survival, and Immunogenicity following Grafting in CNS Tissue
Cell Transplantation
author_facet Jelle Praet
Kristien Reekmans
Dan Lin
Nathalie De Vocht
Irene Bergwerf
Bart Tambuyzer
Jasmijn Daans
Niel Hens
Herman Goossens
Patrick Pauwels
Zwi Berneman
Annemie Van Der Linden
Peter Ponsaerts
author_sort Jelle Praet
title Cell Type-Associated Differences in Migration, Survival, and Immunogenicity following Grafting in CNS Tissue
title_short Cell Type-Associated Differences in Migration, Survival, and Immunogenicity following Grafting in CNS Tissue
title_full Cell Type-Associated Differences in Migration, Survival, and Immunogenicity following Grafting in CNS Tissue
title_fullStr Cell Type-Associated Differences in Migration, Survival, and Immunogenicity following Grafting in CNS Tissue
title_full_unstemmed Cell Type-Associated Differences in Migration, Survival, and Immunogenicity following Grafting in CNS Tissue
title_sort cell type-associated differences in migration, survival, and immunogenicity following grafting in cns tissue
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Cell Transplantation
issn 0963-6897
1555-3892
publishDate 2012-09-01
description Cell transplantation has been suggested to display several neuroprotective and/or neuroregenerative effects in animal models of central nervous system (CNS) trauma. However, while most studies report on clinical observations, currently little is known regarding the actual fate of the cell populations grafted and whether or how the brain's innate immune system, mainly directed by activated microglia and astrocytes, interacts with autologous cellular implants. In this study, we grafted well-characterized neural stem cell, mouse embryonic fibroblast, dendritic cell, bone marrow mononuclear cell, and splenocyte populations, all isolated or cultured from C57BL/6-eGFP transgenic mice, below the capsula externa (CE) of healthy C57BL/6 mice and below the inflamed/demyelinated CE of cuprizone-treated C57BL/6 mice. Two weeks postgrafting, an extensive quantitative multicolor histological analysis was performed in order (i) to quantify cell graft localization, migration, survival, and toxicity and (ii) to characterize endogenous CNS immune responses against the different cell grafts. Obtained results indicate dependence on the cell type grafted: (i) a different degree of cell graft migration, survival, and toxicity and (ii) a different organization of the endogenous immune response. Based on these observations, we warrant that further research should be undertaken to understand—and eventually control—cell graft-induced tissue damage and activation of the brain's innate immune system. The latter will be inevitable before cell grafting in the CNS can be performed safely and successfully in clinical settings.
url https://doi.org/10.3727/096368912X636920
work_keys_str_mv AT jellepraet celltypeassociateddifferencesinmigrationsurvivalandimmunogenicityfollowinggraftingincnstissue
AT kristienreekmans celltypeassociateddifferencesinmigrationsurvivalandimmunogenicityfollowinggraftingincnstissue
AT danlin celltypeassociateddifferencesinmigrationsurvivalandimmunogenicityfollowinggraftingincnstissue
AT nathaliedevocht celltypeassociateddifferencesinmigrationsurvivalandimmunogenicityfollowinggraftingincnstissue
AT irenebergwerf celltypeassociateddifferencesinmigrationsurvivalandimmunogenicityfollowinggraftingincnstissue
AT barttambuyzer celltypeassociateddifferencesinmigrationsurvivalandimmunogenicityfollowinggraftingincnstissue
AT jasmijndaans celltypeassociateddifferencesinmigrationsurvivalandimmunogenicityfollowinggraftingincnstissue
AT nielhens celltypeassociateddifferencesinmigrationsurvivalandimmunogenicityfollowinggraftingincnstissue
AT hermangoossens celltypeassociateddifferencesinmigrationsurvivalandimmunogenicityfollowinggraftingincnstissue
AT patrickpauwels celltypeassociateddifferencesinmigrationsurvivalandimmunogenicityfollowinggraftingincnstissue
AT zwiberneman celltypeassociateddifferencesinmigrationsurvivalandimmunogenicityfollowinggraftingincnstissue
AT annemievanderlinden celltypeassociateddifferencesinmigrationsurvivalandimmunogenicityfollowinggraftingincnstissue
AT peterponsaerts celltypeassociateddifferencesinmigrationsurvivalandimmunogenicityfollowinggraftingincnstissue
_version_ 1724588371087458304