Time for revolution? Enhancing meaningful involvement of people living with HIV and affected communities in HIV cure-focused science

Introduction: Involving affected communities and people living with HIV (PLHIV) in HIV cure-focused clinical trials has ethical and practical benefits. However, there can be barriers to meaningful involvement of ‘lay people’ in scientific research meaning community consultation is often limited or t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jillian S.Y. Lau, Miranda Z. Smith, Brent Allan, Karine Dubé, A. Toni Young, Jennifer Power
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-11-01
Series:Journal of Virus Eradication
Subjects:
HIV
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2055664020314679
id doaj-ef7b7e06e1534299ae21bda3cb104913
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ef7b7e06e1534299ae21bda3cb1049132021-05-05T04:07:30ZengElsevierJournal of Virus Eradication2055-66402020-11-0164100018Time for revolution? Enhancing meaningful involvement of people living with HIV and affected communities in HIV cure-focused scienceJillian S.Y. Lau0Miranda Z. Smith1Brent Allan2Karine Dubé3A. Toni Young4Jennifer Power5Alfred Health and Monash University, Melbourne, AustraliaPeter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, AustraliaInternational Council of AIDS Service Organizations, Toronto, CanadaGillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USADistrict of Columbia Centre for AIDS Research, Community Education Group, Washington D.C., USAAustralian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia; Corresponding author. Building NR6, La Trobe University Melbourne Campus, Melbourne, 3086, Australia.Introduction: Involving affected communities and people living with HIV (PLHIV) in HIV cure-focused clinical trials has ethical and practical benefits. However, there can be barriers to meaningful involvement of ‘lay people’ in scientific research meaning community consultation is often limited or tokenistic. This paper reports on an Australian project, the INSPIRE project (Improve, Nurture and Strengthen education, collaboration, and communication between PLHIV and Researchers), which aimed to explore barriers and enablers to enactment of the principles of meaningful involvement of PLHIV (MIPA) and affected communities in HIV cure-focused research. Methods: The project involved a workshop attended by 40 stakeholders involved in HIV care, research or advocacy including PLHIV, community organizations, basic scientists, and clinicians. The workshop involved a facilitated discussion about community involvement in a hypothetical HIV cure-focused clinical trial. Data were collected through notetaking and video recordings. Qualitative, thematic analysis was undertaken to organize the data and identify core themes related to MIPA. Results: Workshop discussions revealed community stakeholders often feel their involvement in HIV clinical research is undervalued, evidenced by limited financial remuneration and minimal capacity to influence the research design or processes. Building long-term, formal and informal relationships between community organizations, PLHIV, researchers and research teams or laboratories was identified as a strategy to support MIPA at all stages of a clinical trial, from design to dissemination of findings. Conclusions: Enacting MIPA principles in HIV cure-focused research requires a better understanding of the potential to improve research outcomes and ensure quality in the research process.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2055664020314679HIVHIV cureWorkshopClinical trialCommunityPeople living with HIV
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jillian S.Y. Lau
Miranda Z. Smith
Brent Allan
Karine Dubé
A. Toni Young
Jennifer Power
spellingShingle Jillian S.Y. Lau
Miranda Z. Smith
Brent Allan
Karine Dubé
A. Toni Young
Jennifer Power
Time for revolution? Enhancing meaningful involvement of people living with HIV and affected communities in HIV cure-focused science
Journal of Virus Eradication
HIV
HIV cure
Workshop
Clinical trial
Community
People living with HIV
author_facet Jillian S.Y. Lau
Miranda Z. Smith
Brent Allan
Karine Dubé
A. Toni Young
Jennifer Power
author_sort Jillian S.Y. Lau
title Time for revolution? Enhancing meaningful involvement of people living with HIV and affected communities in HIV cure-focused science
title_short Time for revolution? Enhancing meaningful involvement of people living with HIV and affected communities in HIV cure-focused science
title_full Time for revolution? Enhancing meaningful involvement of people living with HIV and affected communities in HIV cure-focused science
title_fullStr Time for revolution? Enhancing meaningful involvement of people living with HIV and affected communities in HIV cure-focused science
title_full_unstemmed Time for revolution? Enhancing meaningful involvement of people living with HIV and affected communities in HIV cure-focused science
title_sort time for revolution? enhancing meaningful involvement of people living with hiv and affected communities in hiv cure-focused science
publisher Elsevier
series Journal of Virus Eradication
issn 2055-6640
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Introduction: Involving affected communities and people living with HIV (PLHIV) in HIV cure-focused clinical trials has ethical and practical benefits. However, there can be barriers to meaningful involvement of ‘lay people’ in scientific research meaning community consultation is often limited or tokenistic. This paper reports on an Australian project, the INSPIRE project (Improve, Nurture and Strengthen education, collaboration, and communication between PLHIV and Researchers), which aimed to explore barriers and enablers to enactment of the principles of meaningful involvement of PLHIV (MIPA) and affected communities in HIV cure-focused research. Methods: The project involved a workshop attended by 40 stakeholders involved in HIV care, research or advocacy including PLHIV, community organizations, basic scientists, and clinicians. The workshop involved a facilitated discussion about community involvement in a hypothetical HIV cure-focused clinical trial. Data were collected through notetaking and video recordings. Qualitative, thematic analysis was undertaken to organize the data and identify core themes related to MIPA. Results: Workshop discussions revealed community stakeholders often feel their involvement in HIV clinical research is undervalued, evidenced by limited financial remuneration and minimal capacity to influence the research design or processes. Building long-term, formal and informal relationships between community organizations, PLHIV, researchers and research teams or laboratories was identified as a strategy to support MIPA at all stages of a clinical trial, from design to dissemination of findings. Conclusions: Enacting MIPA principles in HIV cure-focused research requires a better understanding of the potential to improve research outcomes and ensure quality in the research process.
topic HIV
HIV cure
Workshop
Clinical trial
Community
People living with HIV
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2055664020314679
work_keys_str_mv AT jilliansylau timeforrevolutionenhancingmeaningfulinvolvementofpeoplelivingwithhivandaffectedcommunitiesinhivcurefocusedscience
AT mirandazsmith timeforrevolutionenhancingmeaningfulinvolvementofpeoplelivingwithhivandaffectedcommunitiesinhivcurefocusedscience
AT brentallan timeforrevolutionenhancingmeaningfulinvolvementofpeoplelivingwithhivandaffectedcommunitiesinhivcurefocusedscience
AT karinedube timeforrevolutionenhancingmeaningfulinvolvementofpeoplelivingwithhivandaffectedcommunitiesinhivcurefocusedscience
AT atoniyoung timeforrevolutionenhancingmeaningfulinvolvementofpeoplelivingwithhivandaffectedcommunitiesinhivcurefocusedscience
AT jenniferpower timeforrevolutionenhancingmeaningfulinvolvementofpeoplelivingwithhivandaffectedcommunitiesinhivcurefocusedscience
_version_ 1721475655481163776