Diagnostic value of fine-needle aspiration biopsy for breast mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of the breast is a minimally invasive yet maximally diagnostic method. However, the clinical use of FNAB has been questioned. The purpose of our study was to establish the overall value of FNAC in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu Ying-Hua, Wei Wei, Liu Jian-Lun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-01-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/12/41
id doaj-efa74ac746394aa1a2de4dce67aa8723
record_format Article
spelling doaj-efa74ac746394aa1a2de4dce67aa87232020-11-24T21:39:30ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072012-01-011214110.1186/1471-2407-12-41Diagnostic value of fine-needle aspiration biopsy for breast mass: a systematic review and meta-analysisYu Ying-HuaWei WeiLiu Jian-Lun<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of the breast is a minimally invasive yet maximally diagnostic method. However, the clinical use of FNAB has been questioned. The purpose of our study was to establish the overall value of FNAC in the diagnosis of breast lesions.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>After a review and quality assessment of 46 studies, sensitivity, specificity and other measures of accuracy of FNAB for evaluating breast lesions were pooled using random-effects models. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were used to summarize overall accuracy. The sensitivity and specificity for the studies data (included unsatisfactory samples) and underestimation rate of unsatisfactory samples were also calculated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The summary estimates for FNAB in diagnosis of breast carcinoma were as follows (unsatisfactory samples was temporarily exluded): sensitivity, 0.927 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.921 to 0.933); specificity, 0.948 (95% CI, 0.943 to 0.952); positive likelihood ratio, 25.72 (95% CI, 17.35 to 28.13); negative likelihood ratio, 0.08 (95% CI, 0.06 to 0.11); diagnostic odds ratio, 429.73 (95% CI, 241.75 to 763.87); The pooled sensitivity and specificity for 11 studies, which reported unsatisfactory samples (unsatisfactory samples was considered to be positive in this classification) were 0.920 (95% CI, 0.906 to 0.933) and 0.768 (95% CI, 0.751 to 0.784) respectively. The pooled proportion of unsatisfactory samples that were subsequently upgraded to various grade cancers was 27.5% (95% CI, 0.221 to 0.296).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>FNAB is an accurate biopsy for evaluating breast malignancy if rigorous criteria are used. With regard to unsatisfactory samples, futher invasive procedures are required in order to minimize the chance of a missed diagnosis of breast cancer.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/12/41
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yu Ying-Hua
Wei Wei
Liu Jian-Lun
spellingShingle Yu Ying-Hua
Wei Wei
Liu Jian-Lun
Diagnostic value of fine-needle aspiration biopsy for breast mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BMC Cancer
author_facet Yu Ying-Hua
Wei Wei
Liu Jian-Lun
author_sort Yu Ying-Hua
title Diagnostic value of fine-needle aspiration biopsy for breast mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Diagnostic value of fine-needle aspiration biopsy for breast mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Diagnostic value of fine-needle aspiration biopsy for breast mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic value of fine-needle aspiration biopsy for breast mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic value of fine-needle aspiration biopsy for breast mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic value of fine-needle aspiration biopsy for breast mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher BMC
series BMC Cancer
issn 1471-2407
publishDate 2012-01-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of the breast is a minimally invasive yet maximally diagnostic method. However, the clinical use of FNAB has been questioned. The purpose of our study was to establish the overall value of FNAC in the diagnosis of breast lesions.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>After a review and quality assessment of 46 studies, sensitivity, specificity and other measures of accuracy of FNAB for evaluating breast lesions were pooled using random-effects models. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were used to summarize overall accuracy. The sensitivity and specificity for the studies data (included unsatisfactory samples) and underestimation rate of unsatisfactory samples were also calculated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The summary estimates for FNAB in diagnosis of breast carcinoma were as follows (unsatisfactory samples was temporarily exluded): sensitivity, 0.927 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.921 to 0.933); specificity, 0.948 (95% CI, 0.943 to 0.952); positive likelihood ratio, 25.72 (95% CI, 17.35 to 28.13); negative likelihood ratio, 0.08 (95% CI, 0.06 to 0.11); diagnostic odds ratio, 429.73 (95% CI, 241.75 to 763.87); The pooled sensitivity and specificity for 11 studies, which reported unsatisfactory samples (unsatisfactory samples was considered to be positive in this classification) were 0.920 (95% CI, 0.906 to 0.933) and 0.768 (95% CI, 0.751 to 0.784) respectively. The pooled proportion of unsatisfactory samples that were subsequently upgraded to various grade cancers was 27.5% (95% CI, 0.221 to 0.296).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>FNAB is an accurate biopsy for evaluating breast malignancy if rigorous criteria are used. With regard to unsatisfactory samples, futher invasive procedures are required in order to minimize the chance of a missed diagnosis of breast cancer.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/12/41
work_keys_str_mv AT yuyinghua diagnosticvalueoffineneedleaspirationbiopsyforbreastmassasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT weiwei diagnosticvalueoffineneedleaspirationbiopsyforbreastmassasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liujianlun diagnosticvalueoffineneedleaspirationbiopsyforbreastmassasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1725930992627089408