Language in social reproduction: Sociolinguistics and sociosemiotics

This paper focuses on the semiotic foundations of sociolinguistics. Starting from the definition of “sociolinguistics” given by the philosopher Adam Schaff, the paper examines in particular the notion of “critical sociolinguistics” as theorized by the Italian semiotician Ferruccio Rossi-Landi. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Patrizia Calefato
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Tartu Press 2009-12-01
Series:Sign Systems Studies
Online Access:https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/15566
id doaj-f0000bead26143bbbb7592e4d3b256a3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f0000bead26143bbbb7592e4d3b256a32021-04-02T14:25:38ZengUniversity of Tartu PressSign Systems Studies1406-42431736-74092009-12-01371/210.12697/SSS.2009.37.1-2.03Language in social reproduction: Sociolinguistics and sociosemioticsPatrizia Calefato0Department of Linguistic Practices and Text Analysis, University of Bari, Via Garruba 6, 70122 Bari This paper focuses on the semiotic foundations of sociolinguistics. Starting from the definition of “sociolinguistics” given by the philosopher Adam Schaff, the paper examines in particular the notion of “critical sociolinguistics” as theorized by the Italian semiotician Ferruccio Rossi-Landi. The basis of the social dimension of language are to be found in what Rossi-Landi calls “social reproduction” which regards both verbal and non-verbal signs. Saussure’s notion of langue can be considered in this way, with reference not only to his Course of General Linguistics, but also to his Harvard Manuscripts. The paper goes on trying also to understand Roland Barthes’s provocative definition of semiology as a part of linguistics (and not vice-versa) as well as developing the notion of communication-production in this perspective. Some articles of Roman Jakobson of the sixties allow us to reflect in a manner which we now call “socio-semiotic” on the processes of transformation of the “organic” signs into signs of a new type, which articulate the relationship between organic and instrumental. In this sense, socio-linguistics is intended as being sociosemiotics, without prejudice to the fact that the reference area must be human, since semiotics also has the prerogative of referring to the world of non-human vital signs. Socio-linguistics as socio-semiotics assumes the role of a “frontier” science, in the dual sense that it is not only on the border between science of language and the anthropological and social sciences, but also that it can be constructed in a movement of continual “crossing frontiers” and of “contamination” between languages and disciplinary environments. https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/15566
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Patrizia Calefato
spellingShingle Patrizia Calefato
Language in social reproduction: Sociolinguistics and sociosemiotics
Sign Systems Studies
author_facet Patrizia Calefato
author_sort Patrizia Calefato
title Language in social reproduction: Sociolinguistics and sociosemiotics
title_short Language in social reproduction: Sociolinguistics and sociosemiotics
title_full Language in social reproduction: Sociolinguistics and sociosemiotics
title_fullStr Language in social reproduction: Sociolinguistics and sociosemiotics
title_full_unstemmed Language in social reproduction: Sociolinguistics and sociosemiotics
title_sort language in social reproduction: sociolinguistics and sociosemiotics
publisher University of Tartu Press
series Sign Systems Studies
issn 1406-4243
1736-7409
publishDate 2009-12-01
description This paper focuses on the semiotic foundations of sociolinguistics. Starting from the definition of “sociolinguistics” given by the philosopher Adam Schaff, the paper examines in particular the notion of “critical sociolinguistics” as theorized by the Italian semiotician Ferruccio Rossi-Landi. The basis of the social dimension of language are to be found in what Rossi-Landi calls “social reproduction” which regards both verbal and non-verbal signs. Saussure’s notion of langue can be considered in this way, with reference not only to his Course of General Linguistics, but also to his Harvard Manuscripts. The paper goes on trying also to understand Roland Barthes’s provocative definition of semiology as a part of linguistics (and not vice-versa) as well as developing the notion of communication-production in this perspective. Some articles of Roman Jakobson of the sixties allow us to reflect in a manner which we now call “socio-semiotic” on the processes of transformation of the “organic” signs into signs of a new type, which articulate the relationship between organic and instrumental. In this sense, socio-linguistics is intended as being sociosemiotics, without prejudice to the fact that the reference area must be human, since semiotics also has the prerogative of referring to the world of non-human vital signs. Socio-linguistics as socio-semiotics assumes the role of a “frontier” science, in the dual sense that it is not only on the border between science of language and the anthropological and social sciences, but also that it can be constructed in a movement of continual “crossing frontiers” and of “contamination” between languages and disciplinary environments.
url https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/15566
work_keys_str_mv AT patriziacalefato languageinsocialreproductionsociolinguisticsandsociosemiotics
_version_ 1721562291524075520