A New Device for Protection from Radiation Exposure during Catheter Ablation

Background: As the indications for catheter ablation of complex arrhythmias has expanded, the radiation exposure to the operator has increased. Recently, a radiation protection cabin (RPC) has been developed. However, the effect of reducing the radiation exposure of the operator has not been fully e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shinya Kowase, MD, Kenji Kurosaki, MD, Mihoko Miyamoto, MD, Yasushi Oginosawa, MD, Aiko Sugiyasu, MD, Shoichi Kubota, MD, Akihiko Nogami, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2009-01-01
Series:Journal of Arrhythmia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1880427609800203
id doaj-f02d72c2f5dc49bf9fac9fa7010d0641
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f02d72c2f5dc49bf9fac9fa7010d06412020-11-24T20:50:47ZengWileyJournal of Arrhythmia1880-42762009-01-01252778010.1016/S1880-4276(09)80020-3A New Device for Protection from Radiation Exposure during Catheter AblationShinya Kowase, MDKenji Kurosaki, MDMihoko Miyamoto, MDYasushi Oginosawa, MDAiko Sugiyasu, MDShoichi Kubota, MDAkihiko Nogami, MDBackground: As the indications for catheter ablation of complex arrhythmias has expanded, the radiation exposure to the operator has increased. Recently, a radiation protection cabin (RPC) has been developed. However, the effect of reducing the radiation exposure of the operator has not been fully evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy the RPC during catheter ablation (CA). Method & Results: Twenty-six patients who underwent CA were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups, those in which the RPC was used (RPC group; n = 11) and those in which it was not used (no RPC group; n = 15). The radiation dosage was measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters placed on the head and chest. The decrement rates at the unprotected area of not only the operator but also the assistant in the RPC group were significantly higher than those in the no RPC group. There was no significant difference in the decrement rate in the protected areas between the two groups. Conclusion: This study shows that the RPC protects from radiation exposure not only the operator but also the assistant and frees us from using a heavy apron.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1880427609800203Radiation protection cabinRadiation exposureCatheter ablation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shinya Kowase, MD
Kenji Kurosaki, MD
Mihoko Miyamoto, MD
Yasushi Oginosawa, MD
Aiko Sugiyasu, MD
Shoichi Kubota, MD
Akihiko Nogami, MD
spellingShingle Shinya Kowase, MD
Kenji Kurosaki, MD
Mihoko Miyamoto, MD
Yasushi Oginosawa, MD
Aiko Sugiyasu, MD
Shoichi Kubota, MD
Akihiko Nogami, MD
A New Device for Protection from Radiation Exposure during Catheter Ablation
Journal of Arrhythmia
Radiation protection cabin
Radiation exposure
Catheter ablation
author_facet Shinya Kowase, MD
Kenji Kurosaki, MD
Mihoko Miyamoto, MD
Yasushi Oginosawa, MD
Aiko Sugiyasu, MD
Shoichi Kubota, MD
Akihiko Nogami, MD
author_sort Shinya Kowase, MD
title A New Device for Protection from Radiation Exposure during Catheter Ablation
title_short A New Device for Protection from Radiation Exposure during Catheter Ablation
title_full A New Device for Protection from Radiation Exposure during Catheter Ablation
title_fullStr A New Device for Protection from Radiation Exposure during Catheter Ablation
title_full_unstemmed A New Device for Protection from Radiation Exposure during Catheter Ablation
title_sort new device for protection from radiation exposure during catheter ablation
publisher Wiley
series Journal of Arrhythmia
issn 1880-4276
publishDate 2009-01-01
description Background: As the indications for catheter ablation of complex arrhythmias has expanded, the radiation exposure to the operator has increased. Recently, a radiation protection cabin (RPC) has been developed. However, the effect of reducing the radiation exposure of the operator has not been fully evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy the RPC during catheter ablation (CA). Method & Results: Twenty-six patients who underwent CA were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups, those in which the RPC was used (RPC group; n = 11) and those in which it was not used (no RPC group; n = 15). The radiation dosage was measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters placed on the head and chest. The decrement rates at the unprotected area of not only the operator but also the assistant in the RPC group were significantly higher than those in the no RPC group. There was no significant difference in the decrement rate in the protected areas between the two groups. Conclusion: This study shows that the RPC protects from radiation exposure not only the operator but also the assistant and frees us from using a heavy apron.
topic Radiation protection cabin
Radiation exposure
Catheter ablation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1880427609800203
work_keys_str_mv AT shinyakowasemd anewdeviceforprotectionfromradiationexposureduringcatheterablation
AT kenjikurosakimd anewdeviceforprotectionfromradiationexposureduringcatheterablation
AT mihokomiyamotomd anewdeviceforprotectionfromradiationexposureduringcatheterablation
AT yasushioginosawamd anewdeviceforprotectionfromradiationexposureduringcatheterablation
AT aikosugiyasumd anewdeviceforprotectionfromradiationexposureduringcatheterablation
AT shoichikubotamd anewdeviceforprotectionfromradiationexposureduringcatheterablation
AT akihikonogamimd anewdeviceforprotectionfromradiationexposureduringcatheterablation
AT shinyakowasemd newdeviceforprotectionfromradiationexposureduringcatheterablation
AT kenjikurosakimd newdeviceforprotectionfromradiationexposureduringcatheterablation
AT mihokomiyamotomd newdeviceforprotectionfromradiationexposureduringcatheterablation
AT yasushioginosawamd newdeviceforprotectionfromradiationexposureduringcatheterablation
AT aikosugiyasumd newdeviceforprotectionfromradiationexposureduringcatheterablation
AT shoichikubotamd newdeviceforprotectionfromradiationexposureduringcatheterablation
AT akihikonogamimd newdeviceforprotectionfromradiationexposureduringcatheterablation
_version_ 1716803627902828544