Mind, Davidson and Reality
The aim of this article is to show that the prospects for intentional irreal-ism are much brighter than it is generally thought. In the first section, I provide a general characterization of some of the various forms that the realism/irrealism debates might take. In the second, I ask whether there i...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
2005-12-01
|
Series: | Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/14609/13357 |
id |
doaj-f03df8089bcc4ea0a1f94c0a1481f8a7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f03df8089bcc4ea0a1f94c0a1481f8a72020-11-24T23:54:44ZengUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaPrincipia: An International Journal of Epistemology1414-42471808-17112005-12-01091-2125157Mind, Davidson and RealityDaniel LaurierThe aim of this article is to show that the prospects for intentional irreal-ism are much brighter than it is generally thought. In the first section, I provide a general characterization of some of the various forms that the realism/irrealism debates might take. In the second, I ask whether there is any defensible form of realism about intentional states. I show that most candidates are nearly trivially false, and that the only form of in-tentional realism which is not, is a restricted one which is prima facie no more plausible than the corresponding form of irrealism. In the third and last section, I defend my interpretation of what intentional irrealism amounts to against some possible misunderstandings, give some reasons why it should be taken seriously and argue that it could plausibly be at-tributed to Davidson.http://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/14609/13357RealismintentionalityobjectivitydependenceDavidson |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Daniel Laurier |
spellingShingle |
Daniel Laurier Mind, Davidson and Reality Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology Realism intentionality objectivity dependence Davidson |
author_facet |
Daniel Laurier |
author_sort |
Daniel Laurier |
title |
Mind, Davidson and Reality |
title_short |
Mind, Davidson and Reality |
title_full |
Mind, Davidson and Reality |
title_fullStr |
Mind, Davidson and Reality |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mind, Davidson and Reality |
title_sort |
mind, davidson and reality |
publisher |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
series |
Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology |
issn |
1414-4247 1808-1711 |
publishDate |
2005-12-01 |
description |
The aim of this article is to show that the prospects for intentional irreal-ism are much brighter than it is generally thought. In the first section, I provide a general characterization of some of the various forms that the realism/irrealism debates might take. In the second, I ask whether there is any defensible form of realism about intentional states. I show that most candidates are nearly trivially false, and that the only form of in-tentional realism which is not, is a restricted one which is prima facie no more plausible than the corresponding form of irrealism. In the third and last section, I defend my interpretation of what intentional irrealism amounts to against some possible misunderstandings, give some reasons why it should be taken seriously and argue that it could plausibly be at-tributed to Davidson. |
topic |
Realism intentionality objectivity dependence Davidson |
url |
http://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/14609/13357 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT daniellaurier minddavidsonandreality |
_version_ |
1725465128287076352 |