The Impact Packaging Type Has on the Flavor of Wine

This is a literature review of the most commonly available wine packaging categories. This includes glass bottles, polyethylene terephthalate bottles (PET), bag-in-box (BIB), aluminum cans, and Tetra Pak. This review includes a description and history of each category. In addition, the market share...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katherine A. Thompson-Witrick, Eric R. Pitts, John L. Nemenyi, Drew Budner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Beverages
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5710/7/2/36
id doaj-f0a2756681a648bfbe08319dbfe4667b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f0a2756681a648bfbe08319dbfe4667b2021-06-30T23:29:15ZengMDPI AGBeverages2306-57102021-06-017363610.3390/beverages7020036The Impact Packaging Type Has on the Flavor of WineKatherine A. Thompson-Witrick0Eric R. Pitts1John L. Nemenyi2Drew Budner3Food Science and Human Nutrition Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USAFood Science and Human Nutrition Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USAAgricultural and Biological Engineering Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USADepartment of Chemistry, Coastal Carolina University, Conway, SC 29526, USAThis is a literature review of the most commonly available wine packaging categories. This includes glass bottles, polyethylene terephthalate bottles (PET), bag-in-box (BIB), aluminum cans, and Tetra Pak. This review includes a description and history of each category. In addition, the market share and environmental impacts of each category are discussed. Special attention is paid to the reported impact on packaged wine flavor and aroma for each packaging type. Finally, the potential impacts on consumer preference are discussed. While glass is still the dominant packaging material within the wine industry and by consumer demand, economic and environmental concerns are driving the industry and consumers to investigate and adopt alternative packaging materials.https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5710/7/2/36wine packagingflavorsustainabilitywine bottlesaluminum cansconsumer preference
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Katherine A. Thompson-Witrick
Eric R. Pitts
John L. Nemenyi
Drew Budner
spellingShingle Katherine A. Thompson-Witrick
Eric R. Pitts
John L. Nemenyi
Drew Budner
The Impact Packaging Type Has on the Flavor of Wine
Beverages
wine packaging
flavor
sustainability
wine bottles
aluminum cans
consumer preference
author_facet Katherine A. Thompson-Witrick
Eric R. Pitts
John L. Nemenyi
Drew Budner
author_sort Katherine A. Thompson-Witrick
title The Impact Packaging Type Has on the Flavor of Wine
title_short The Impact Packaging Type Has on the Flavor of Wine
title_full The Impact Packaging Type Has on the Flavor of Wine
title_fullStr The Impact Packaging Type Has on the Flavor of Wine
title_full_unstemmed The Impact Packaging Type Has on the Flavor of Wine
title_sort impact packaging type has on the flavor of wine
publisher MDPI AG
series Beverages
issn 2306-5710
publishDate 2021-06-01
description This is a literature review of the most commonly available wine packaging categories. This includes glass bottles, polyethylene terephthalate bottles (PET), bag-in-box (BIB), aluminum cans, and Tetra Pak. This review includes a description and history of each category. In addition, the market share and environmental impacts of each category are discussed. Special attention is paid to the reported impact on packaged wine flavor and aroma for each packaging type. Finally, the potential impacts on consumer preference are discussed. While glass is still the dominant packaging material within the wine industry and by consumer demand, economic and environmental concerns are driving the industry and consumers to investigate and adopt alternative packaging materials.
topic wine packaging
flavor
sustainability
wine bottles
aluminum cans
consumer preference
url https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5710/7/2/36
work_keys_str_mv AT katherineathompsonwitrick theimpactpackagingtypehasontheflavorofwine
AT ericrpitts theimpactpackagingtypehasontheflavorofwine
AT johnlnemenyi theimpactpackagingtypehasontheflavorofwine
AT drewbudner theimpactpackagingtypehasontheflavorofwine
AT katherineathompsonwitrick impactpackagingtypehasontheflavorofwine
AT ericrpitts impactpackagingtypehasontheflavorofwine
AT johnlnemenyi impactpackagingtypehasontheflavorofwine
AT drewbudner impactpackagingtypehasontheflavorofwine
_version_ 1721351282717884416