Pelvic incidence variation among individuals: functional influence versus genetic determinism

Abstract Pelvic incidence has become one of the most important sagittal parameters in spinal surgery. Despite its great importance, pelvic incidence can vary from 33° to 85° in the normal population. The reasons for this great variability in pelvic incidence remain unexplored. The objective of this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hong-Fang Chen, Chang-Qing Zhao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-03-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-018-0762-9
id doaj-f0bfce62bb7242259e1773c8b640d432
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f0bfce62bb7242259e1773c8b640d4322020-11-25T00:46:44ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2018-03-011311610.1186/s13018-018-0762-9Pelvic incidence variation among individuals: functional influence versus genetic determinismHong-Fang Chen0Chang-Qing Zhao1Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineShanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implants, Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineAbstract Pelvic incidence has become one of the most important sagittal parameters in spinal surgery. Despite its great importance, pelvic incidence can vary from 33° to 85° in the normal population. The reasons for this great variability in pelvic incidence remain unexplored. The objective of this article is to present some possible interpretations for the great variability in pelvic incidence under both normal and pathological conditions and to further understand the determinants of pelvic incidence from the perspective of the functional requirements for bipedalism and genetic backgrounds via a literature review. We postulate that both pelvic incidence and pelvic morphology may be genetically predetermined, and a great variability in pelvic incidence may already exist even before birth. This great variability may also serve as a further reminder that the sagittal profile, bipedal locomotion mode, and genetic background of every individual are unique and specific, and clinicians should avoid making universally applying broad generalizations of pelvic incidence. Although PI is an important parameter and there are many theories behind its variability, we still do not have clear mechanistic answers.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-018-0762-9Pelvic incidenceSpinal surgeryBipedal locomotionGenetics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hong-Fang Chen
Chang-Qing Zhao
spellingShingle Hong-Fang Chen
Chang-Qing Zhao
Pelvic incidence variation among individuals: functional influence versus genetic determinism
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Pelvic incidence
Spinal surgery
Bipedal locomotion
Genetics
author_facet Hong-Fang Chen
Chang-Qing Zhao
author_sort Hong-Fang Chen
title Pelvic incidence variation among individuals: functional influence versus genetic determinism
title_short Pelvic incidence variation among individuals: functional influence versus genetic determinism
title_full Pelvic incidence variation among individuals: functional influence versus genetic determinism
title_fullStr Pelvic incidence variation among individuals: functional influence versus genetic determinism
title_full_unstemmed Pelvic incidence variation among individuals: functional influence versus genetic determinism
title_sort pelvic incidence variation among individuals: functional influence versus genetic determinism
publisher BMC
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
issn 1749-799X
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Abstract Pelvic incidence has become one of the most important sagittal parameters in spinal surgery. Despite its great importance, pelvic incidence can vary from 33° to 85° in the normal population. The reasons for this great variability in pelvic incidence remain unexplored. The objective of this article is to present some possible interpretations for the great variability in pelvic incidence under both normal and pathological conditions and to further understand the determinants of pelvic incidence from the perspective of the functional requirements for bipedalism and genetic backgrounds via a literature review. We postulate that both pelvic incidence and pelvic morphology may be genetically predetermined, and a great variability in pelvic incidence may already exist even before birth. This great variability may also serve as a further reminder that the sagittal profile, bipedal locomotion mode, and genetic background of every individual are unique and specific, and clinicians should avoid making universally applying broad generalizations of pelvic incidence. Although PI is an important parameter and there are many theories behind its variability, we still do not have clear mechanistic answers.
topic Pelvic incidence
Spinal surgery
Bipedal locomotion
Genetics
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-018-0762-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hongfangchen pelvicincidencevariationamongindividualsfunctionalinfluenceversusgeneticdeterminism
AT changqingzhao pelvicincidencevariationamongindividualsfunctionalinfluenceversusgeneticdeterminism
_version_ 1725263390689984512