Assessment of the effect of bone density on implant stability: A clinical study

Background: In this study, we determined the effect of bone density on implant stability. Methodology: Two hundred and sixty dental implant sites in 128 patients were assessed for resonance frequency analysis (RFA) following implant insertion, at 6 months and 12 months. The implant stability quotien...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raghunadh Sreerama, Krishna Chaitanya Kolluru, Vineela Gottumukkala, Chaitanya Kumar Innampudi, Jagga Rao Konathala, G Krishnaveni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=5;spage=297;epage=300;aulast=Sreerama
id doaj-f0ca90e548ef4b979e3b3622d1bc1804
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f0ca90e548ef4b979e3b3622d1bc18042021-06-15T04:48:43ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0975-74062021-01-0113529730010.4103/jpbs.JPBS_794_20Assessment of the effect of bone density on implant stability: A clinical studyRaghunadh SreeramaKrishna Chaitanya KolluruVineela GottumukkalaChaitanya Kumar InnampudiJagga Rao KonathalaG KrishnaveniBackground: In this study, we determined the effect of bone density on implant stability. Methodology: Two hundred and sixty dental implant sites in 128 patients were assessed for resonance frequency analysis (RFA) following implant insertion, at 6 months and 12 months. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) was determined. Results: The mean ± standard deviation bone density in anterior mandible was 862.8 ± 203.4 Hounsfield units (HU), in posterior mandible was 528.4 ± 115.6 HU, in anterior maxilla was 594.2 ± 95.2 HU, and in posterior maxilla was 438.1 ± 110.2 HU. The mean insertion torque in successful implants was 38.2 ± 7.1 Ncm and in failed implants was 22.4 ± 4.2 Ncm. The mean RFA value in successful implants was 65.4 ± 5.8 and in failed implants was 45.8 ± 4.1 ISQ. A statistically significant (P < 0.05) difference was obtained. Conclusion: Within the limitation of the study, we observed that successful implants exhibited higher RFA and insertion torque and were higher into failed implants suggesting a correlation of bone quality and implant stability parameters.http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=5;spage=297;epage=300;aulast=Sreeramaimplant stability quotientinsertion torqueresonance frequency analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Raghunadh Sreerama
Krishna Chaitanya Kolluru
Vineela Gottumukkala
Chaitanya Kumar Innampudi
Jagga Rao Konathala
G Krishnaveni
spellingShingle Raghunadh Sreerama
Krishna Chaitanya Kolluru
Vineela Gottumukkala
Chaitanya Kumar Innampudi
Jagga Rao Konathala
G Krishnaveni
Assessment of the effect of bone density on implant stability: A clinical study
Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
implant stability quotient
insertion torque
resonance frequency analysis
author_facet Raghunadh Sreerama
Krishna Chaitanya Kolluru
Vineela Gottumukkala
Chaitanya Kumar Innampudi
Jagga Rao Konathala
G Krishnaveni
author_sort Raghunadh Sreerama
title Assessment of the effect of bone density on implant stability: A clinical study
title_short Assessment of the effect of bone density on implant stability: A clinical study
title_full Assessment of the effect of bone density on implant stability: A clinical study
title_fullStr Assessment of the effect of bone density on implant stability: A clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the effect of bone density on implant stability: A clinical study
title_sort assessment of the effect of bone density on implant stability: a clinical study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
issn 0975-7406
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Background: In this study, we determined the effect of bone density on implant stability. Methodology: Two hundred and sixty dental implant sites in 128 patients were assessed for resonance frequency analysis (RFA) following implant insertion, at 6 months and 12 months. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) was determined. Results: The mean ± standard deviation bone density in anterior mandible was 862.8 ± 203.4 Hounsfield units (HU), in posterior mandible was 528.4 ± 115.6 HU, in anterior maxilla was 594.2 ± 95.2 HU, and in posterior maxilla was 438.1 ± 110.2 HU. The mean insertion torque in successful implants was 38.2 ± 7.1 Ncm and in failed implants was 22.4 ± 4.2 Ncm. The mean RFA value in successful implants was 65.4 ± 5.8 and in failed implants was 45.8 ± 4.1 ISQ. A statistically significant (P < 0.05) difference was obtained. Conclusion: Within the limitation of the study, we observed that successful implants exhibited higher RFA and insertion torque and were higher into failed implants suggesting a correlation of bone quality and implant stability parameters.
topic implant stability quotient
insertion torque
resonance frequency analysis
url http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=5;spage=297;epage=300;aulast=Sreerama
work_keys_str_mv AT raghunadhsreerama assessmentoftheeffectofbonedensityonimplantstabilityaclinicalstudy
AT krishnachaitanyakolluru assessmentoftheeffectofbonedensityonimplantstabilityaclinicalstudy
AT vineelagottumukkala assessmentoftheeffectofbonedensityonimplantstabilityaclinicalstudy
AT chaitanyakumarinnampudi assessmentoftheeffectofbonedensityonimplantstabilityaclinicalstudy
AT jaggaraokonathala assessmentoftheeffectofbonedensityonimplantstabilityaclinicalstudy
AT gkrishnaveni assessmentoftheeffectofbonedensityonimplantstabilityaclinicalstudy
_version_ 1721377384897183744