Loneliness and social isolation interventions for older adults: a scoping review of reviews

Abstract Background Loneliness and social isolation are growing public health concerns in our ageing society. Whilst these experiences occur across the life span, 50% of individuals aged over 60 are at risk of social isolation and one-third will experience some degree of loneliness later in life. Th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olujoke A. Fakoya, Noleen K. McCorry, Michael Donnelly
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-02-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8251-6
id doaj-f0d1dd29f47a4873bc187462630dbf67
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f0d1dd29f47a4873bc187462630dbf672021-02-14T12:04:33ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582020-02-0120111410.1186/s12889-020-8251-6Loneliness and social isolation interventions for older adults: a scoping review of reviewsOlujoke A. Fakoya0Noleen K. McCorry1Michael Donnelly2Centre of Excellence for Public Health, Centre for Public Health, Queen’s UniversityCentre of Excellence for Public Health, Centre for Public Health, Queen’s UniversityCentre of Excellence for Public Health, Centre for Public Health, Queen’s UniversityAbstract Background Loneliness and social isolation are growing public health concerns in our ageing society. Whilst these experiences occur across the life span, 50% of individuals aged over 60 are at risk of social isolation and one-third will experience some degree of loneliness later in life. The aim of this scoping review was to describe the range of interventions to reduce loneliness and social isolation among older adults that have been evaluated; in terms of intervention conceptualisation, categorisation, and components. Methods Three electronic databases (CINAHL, Embase and Medline) were systematically searched for relevant published reviews of interventions for loneliness and social isolation. Inclusion criteria were: review of any type, published in English, a target population of older people and reported data on the categorisation of loneliness and/or social isolation interventions. Data extracted included: categories of interventions and the reasoning underpinning this categorisation. The methodology framework proposed by Arskey and O’Malley and further developed by Levac, et al. was used to guide the scoping review process. Results A total of 33 reviews met the inclusion criteria, evaluating a range of interventions targeted at older people residing in the community or institutionalised settings. Authors of reviews included in this paper often used the same terms to categorise different intervention components and many did not provide a clear definition of these terms. There were inconsistent meanings attributed to intervention characteristics. Overall, interventions were commonly categorised on the basis of: 1) group or one-to-one delivery mode, 2) the goal of the intervention, and 3) the intervention type. Several authors replicated the categorisation system used in previous reviews. Conclusion Many interventions have been developed to combat loneliness and social isolation among older people. The individuality of the experience of loneliness and isolation may cause difficulty in the delivery of standardised interventions. There is no one-size-fits-all approach to addressing loneliness or social isolation, and hence the need to tailor interventions to suit the needs of individuals, specific groups or the degree of loneliness experienced. Therefore, future research should be aimed at discerning what intervention works for whom, in what particular context and how.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8251-6LonelinessLonely - Social isolation - socially isolated - older adultsAged - ageing population - scopingScoping review
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Olujoke A. Fakoya
Noleen K. McCorry
Michael Donnelly
spellingShingle Olujoke A. Fakoya
Noleen K. McCorry
Michael Donnelly
Loneliness and social isolation interventions for older adults: a scoping review of reviews
BMC Public Health
Loneliness
Lonely - Social isolation - socially isolated - older adults
Aged - ageing population - scoping
Scoping review
author_facet Olujoke A. Fakoya
Noleen K. McCorry
Michael Donnelly
author_sort Olujoke A. Fakoya
title Loneliness and social isolation interventions for older adults: a scoping review of reviews
title_short Loneliness and social isolation interventions for older adults: a scoping review of reviews
title_full Loneliness and social isolation interventions for older adults: a scoping review of reviews
title_fullStr Loneliness and social isolation interventions for older adults: a scoping review of reviews
title_full_unstemmed Loneliness and social isolation interventions for older adults: a scoping review of reviews
title_sort loneliness and social isolation interventions for older adults: a scoping review of reviews
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Abstract Background Loneliness and social isolation are growing public health concerns in our ageing society. Whilst these experiences occur across the life span, 50% of individuals aged over 60 are at risk of social isolation and one-third will experience some degree of loneliness later in life. The aim of this scoping review was to describe the range of interventions to reduce loneliness and social isolation among older adults that have been evaluated; in terms of intervention conceptualisation, categorisation, and components. Methods Three electronic databases (CINAHL, Embase and Medline) were systematically searched for relevant published reviews of interventions for loneliness and social isolation. Inclusion criteria were: review of any type, published in English, a target population of older people and reported data on the categorisation of loneliness and/or social isolation interventions. Data extracted included: categories of interventions and the reasoning underpinning this categorisation. The methodology framework proposed by Arskey and O’Malley and further developed by Levac, et al. was used to guide the scoping review process. Results A total of 33 reviews met the inclusion criteria, evaluating a range of interventions targeted at older people residing in the community or institutionalised settings. Authors of reviews included in this paper often used the same terms to categorise different intervention components and many did not provide a clear definition of these terms. There were inconsistent meanings attributed to intervention characteristics. Overall, interventions were commonly categorised on the basis of: 1) group or one-to-one delivery mode, 2) the goal of the intervention, and 3) the intervention type. Several authors replicated the categorisation system used in previous reviews. Conclusion Many interventions have been developed to combat loneliness and social isolation among older people. The individuality of the experience of loneliness and isolation may cause difficulty in the delivery of standardised interventions. There is no one-size-fits-all approach to addressing loneliness or social isolation, and hence the need to tailor interventions to suit the needs of individuals, specific groups or the degree of loneliness experienced. Therefore, future research should be aimed at discerning what intervention works for whom, in what particular context and how.
topic Loneliness
Lonely - Social isolation - socially isolated - older adults
Aged - ageing population - scoping
Scoping review
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8251-6
work_keys_str_mv AT olujokeafakoya lonelinessandsocialisolationinterventionsforolderadultsascopingreviewofreviews
AT noleenkmccorry lonelinessandsocialisolationinterventionsforolderadultsascopingreviewofreviews
AT michaeldonnelly lonelinessandsocialisolationinterventionsforolderadultsascopingreviewofreviews
_version_ 1724271172833509376