Comparative Metagenomic Analysis of Chicken Gut Microbial Community, Function, and Resistome to Evaluate Noninvasive and Cecal Sampling Resources

• Main Authors: Kelang Kang, Yan Hu, Shu Wu, Shourong Shi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
• Series: Animals
• Subjects: metagenome; bacterial community; resistome; sampling resources; chickens
• Online Access: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/6/1718

When conducting metagenomic analysis on gut microbiomes, there is no general consensus concerning the mode of sampling: non-contact (feces), noninvasive (rectal swabs), or cecal. This study aimed to determine the feasibility and comparative merits and disadvantages of using fecal samples or rectal swabs as a proxy for the cecal microbiome. Using broiler as a model, gut microbiomes were obtained from cecal, cloacal, and fecal samples and were characterized according to an analysis of the microbial community, function, and resistome. Cecal samples had higher microbial diversity than feces, while the cecum and cloaca exhibited higher levels of microbial community structure similarity compared with fecal samples. Cecal microbiota possessed higher levels of DNA replicative viability than feces, while fecal microbiota were correlated with increased metabolic activity. When feces were excreted, the abundance of antibiotic resistance genes like <i>tet</i> and <i>ErmG</i> decreased, but some antibiotic genes became more prevalent, such as <i>fexA</i>, <i>tetL</i>, and <i>vatE</i>. Interestingly, <i>Lactobacillus</i> was a dominant bacterial genus in feces that led to differences in microbial community structure, metabolism, and resistome. In conclusion, fecal microbiota have limited potential as a proxy in chicken gut microbial community studies. Thus, feces should be used with caution for characterizing gut microbiomes by metagenomic analysis.