Fake cast florins from Kezlev

It is not for the first century already, that the composition of the monetary circulation of the Crimean Khanate in different periods of its history has been studied. As a result was developed an objective and largely consistent scheme of attribution and dating of its coins. But on the territory of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mikhail Choref
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, State Budgetary Institution “Shigabutdin Marjani Institute of History" 2020-12-01
Series:Крымское историческое обозрение
Subjects:
Online Access:https://crimeanreview.ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/kio_2_2020_161-171_-1.pdf
id doaj-f0ecdd3ac2724452b6c4907e7a0c386f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f0ecdd3ac2724452b6c4907e7a0c386f2021-04-17T08:03:33ZengTatarstan Academy of Sciences, State Budgetary Institution “Shigabutdin Marjani Institute of History"Крымское историческое обозрение2313-612X2712-813X2020-12-011216117110.22378/kio.2020.2.161-171Fake cast florins from KezlevMikhail Choref0Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni NovgorodIt is not for the first century already, that the composition of the monetary circulation of the Crimean Khanate in different periods of its history has been studied. As a result was developed an objective and largely consistent scheme of attribution and dating of its coins. But on the territory of the Khanate were not developed only local issues. Coins of the Ottomans, Moscow state, as well as of European rulers came in abundance on its lands, including and colonial coinage. Evidence of their active use has been preserved in the materials of Kadiasker books. Those books give information about the banknotes, their fluctuations and their rates against the Crimean and Ottoman currencies. However, there is hardly any reason to believe that we know everything about those means of payment. Indeed, the problem of circulation of both, imported and counterfeit coins made in the Crimean Khanate, has not still been properly studied. We believe that the issue of replicas was due to the high demand for large silver coins both on the territory of the Crimean Khanate and beyond, on the lands of the Moscow state. The problem was complicated by the fact that the Crimean khans, before Shahin Giray, could not mint money of great dignity because of the restrictions, imposed on their vassals by the Ottoman sultans. At the same time, the Crimea was an important element of the “Turkish path”, through which silver entered the Moscow state. Thus, the deficit of a large coin in it was very noticeable. In turn, the movement of large volumes of precious metal across the territory of the khanate facilitated the task of importing or producing on the spot fake coins that came to end consumers along with real money. And, indeed, we were able to identify cast imitations of the florins of Zwolle and the county of Oldenburg. They were discovered on the territory of medieval Kezlev. Judged by the primitiveness of technology and low quality of products, we believe that these replicas could not be delivered to the peninsula. Most likely, we should talk about local imitations. We give an affirmative answer to the question of the possibility of issuing replicas of a European coin on the territory of the Crimean Khanate. https://crimeanreview.ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/kio_2_2020_161-171_-1.pdfnumismaticseconomycrimean khanatefake coins
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mikhail Choref
spellingShingle Mikhail Choref
Fake cast florins from Kezlev
Крымское историческое обозрение
numismatics
economy
crimean khanate
fake coins
author_facet Mikhail Choref
author_sort Mikhail Choref
title Fake cast florins from Kezlev
title_short Fake cast florins from Kezlev
title_full Fake cast florins from Kezlev
title_fullStr Fake cast florins from Kezlev
title_full_unstemmed Fake cast florins from Kezlev
title_sort fake cast florins from kezlev
publisher Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, State Budgetary Institution “Shigabutdin Marjani Institute of History"
series Крымское историческое обозрение
issn 2313-612X
2712-813X
publishDate 2020-12-01
description It is not for the first century already, that the composition of the monetary circulation of the Crimean Khanate in different periods of its history has been studied. As a result was developed an objective and largely consistent scheme of attribution and dating of its coins. But on the territory of the Khanate were not developed only local issues. Coins of the Ottomans, Moscow state, as well as of European rulers came in abundance on its lands, including and colonial coinage. Evidence of their active use has been preserved in the materials of Kadiasker books. Those books give information about the banknotes, their fluctuations and their rates against the Crimean and Ottoman currencies. However, there is hardly any reason to believe that we know everything about those means of payment. Indeed, the problem of circulation of both, imported and counterfeit coins made in the Crimean Khanate, has not still been properly studied. We believe that the issue of replicas was due to the high demand for large silver coins both on the territory of the Crimean Khanate and beyond, on the lands of the Moscow state. The problem was complicated by the fact that the Crimean khans, before Shahin Giray, could not mint money of great dignity because of the restrictions, imposed on their vassals by the Ottoman sultans. At the same time, the Crimea was an important element of the “Turkish path”, through which silver entered the Moscow state. Thus, the deficit of a large coin in it was very noticeable. In turn, the movement of large volumes of precious metal across the territory of the khanate facilitated the task of importing or producing on the spot fake coins that came to end consumers along with real money. And, indeed, we were able to identify cast imitations of the florins of Zwolle and the county of Oldenburg. They were discovered on the territory of medieval Kezlev. Judged by the primitiveness of technology and low quality of products, we believe that these replicas could not be delivered to the peninsula. Most likely, we should talk about local imitations. We give an affirmative answer to the question of the possibility of issuing replicas of a European coin on the territory of the Crimean Khanate.
topic numismatics
economy
crimean khanate
fake coins
url https://crimeanreview.ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/kio_2_2020_161-171_-1.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mikhailchoref fakecastflorinsfromkezlev
_version_ 1721523930306445312