Process Evaluation of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S.

To understand the implementation quality of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S., two observers carried out process evaluation in six schools randomly selected from the participating schools in the form of systematic observations of 12 units. Results showed that the overall level of program...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel T.L. Shek, Hing Keung Ma, Joyce H.Y. Lui, Daniel W.M. Lung
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2006-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2006.355
id doaj-f131475717d14a0fb05ede0444c2268e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f131475717d14a0fb05ede0444c2268e2020-11-25T00:50:43ZengHindawi LimitedThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2006-01-0162264227310.1100/tsw.2006.355Process Evaluation of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S.Daniel T.L. Shek0Hing Keung Ma1Joyce H.Y. Lui2Daniel W.M. Lung3Quality of Life Centre, Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, ChinaDepartment of Education Studies, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, ChinaSocial Welfare Practice and Research Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, ChinaSocial Welfare Practice and Research Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, ChinaTo understand the implementation quality of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S., two observers carried out process evaluation in six schools randomly selected from the participating schools in the form of systematic observations of 12 units. Results showed that the overall level of program adherence was generally high, ranging from 50% to 95%, with an average of 84.5%. High implementation quality of the program in the areas of student interest, student participation and involvement, classroom control, use of interactive delivery method, use of strategies to enhance student motivation, instructors familiarity with the students, opportunity for reflection, degree of achievement of the objectives, quality of preparation, overall implementation quality, and success of implementation was also observed. The findings provide support for the implementation quality of the program.http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2006.355
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel T.L. Shek
Hing Keung Ma
Joyce H.Y. Lui
Daniel W.M. Lung
spellingShingle Daniel T.L. Shek
Hing Keung Ma
Joyce H.Y. Lui
Daniel W.M. Lung
Process Evaluation of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S.
The Scientific World Journal
author_facet Daniel T.L. Shek
Hing Keung Ma
Joyce H.Y. Lui
Daniel W.M. Lung
author_sort Daniel T.L. Shek
title Process Evaluation of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S.
title_short Process Evaluation of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S.
title_full Process Evaluation of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S.
title_fullStr Process Evaluation of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S.
title_full_unstemmed Process Evaluation of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S.
title_sort process evaluation of the tier 1 program of the project p.a.t.h.s.
publisher Hindawi Limited
series The Scientific World Journal
issn 1537-744X
publishDate 2006-01-01
description To understand the implementation quality of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S., two observers carried out process evaluation in six schools randomly selected from the participating schools in the form of systematic observations of 12 units. Results showed that the overall level of program adherence was generally high, ranging from 50% to 95%, with an average of 84.5%. High implementation quality of the program in the areas of student interest, student participation and involvement, classroom control, use of interactive delivery method, use of strategies to enhance student motivation, instructors familiarity with the students, opportunity for reflection, degree of achievement of the objectives, quality of preparation, overall implementation quality, and success of implementation was also observed. The findings provide support for the implementation quality of the program.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2006.355
work_keys_str_mv AT danieltlshek processevaluationofthetier1programoftheprojectpaths
AT hingkeungma processevaluationofthetier1programoftheprojectpaths
AT joycehylui processevaluationofthetier1programoftheprojectpaths
AT danielwmlung processevaluationofthetier1programoftheprojectpaths
_version_ 1725246948642914304