Heterogeneous reaction of ClONO<sub>2</sub> with TiO<sub>2</sub> and SiO<sub>2</sub> aerosol particles: implications for stratospheric particle injection for climate engineering

Deliberate injection of aerosol particles into the stratosphere is a potential climate engineering scheme. Particles injected into the stratosphere would scatter solar radiation back to space, thereby reducing the temperature at the Earth's surface and hence the impacts of global warming. M...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Tang, J. Keeble, P. J. Telford, F. D. Pope, P. Braesicke, P. T. Griffiths, N. L. Abraham, J. McGregor, I. M. Watson, R. A. Cox, J. A. Pyle, M. Kalberer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2016-12-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/16/15397/2016/acp-16-15397-2016.pdf
id doaj-f174d6ff45f848aea09f8d67e7758405
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. Tang
M. Tang
M. Tang
J. Keeble
P. J. Telford
P. J. Telford
F. D. Pope
P. Braesicke
P. T. Griffiths
P. T. Griffiths
N. L. Abraham
N. L. Abraham
J. McGregor
I. M. Watson
R. A. Cox
J. A. Pyle
J. A. Pyle
M. Kalberer
spellingShingle M. Tang
M. Tang
M. Tang
J. Keeble
P. J. Telford
P. J. Telford
F. D. Pope
P. Braesicke
P. T. Griffiths
P. T. Griffiths
N. L. Abraham
N. L. Abraham
J. McGregor
I. M. Watson
R. A. Cox
J. A. Pyle
J. A. Pyle
M. Kalberer
Heterogeneous reaction of ClONO<sub>2</sub> with TiO<sub>2</sub> and SiO<sub>2</sub> aerosol particles: implications for stratospheric particle injection for climate engineering
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
author_facet M. Tang
M. Tang
M. Tang
J. Keeble
P. J. Telford
P. J. Telford
F. D. Pope
P. Braesicke
P. T. Griffiths
P. T. Griffiths
N. L. Abraham
N. L. Abraham
J. McGregor
I. M. Watson
R. A. Cox
J. A. Pyle
J. A. Pyle
M. Kalberer
author_sort M. Tang
title Heterogeneous reaction of ClONO<sub>2</sub> with TiO<sub>2</sub> and SiO<sub>2</sub> aerosol particles: implications for stratospheric particle injection for climate engineering
title_short Heterogeneous reaction of ClONO<sub>2</sub> with TiO<sub>2</sub> and SiO<sub>2</sub> aerosol particles: implications for stratospheric particle injection for climate engineering
title_full Heterogeneous reaction of ClONO<sub>2</sub> with TiO<sub>2</sub> and SiO<sub>2</sub> aerosol particles: implications for stratospheric particle injection for climate engineering
title_fullStr Heterogeneous reaction of ClONO<sub>2</sub> with TiO<sub>2</sub> and SiO<sub>2</sub> aerosol particles: implications for stratospheric particle injection for climate engineering
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneous reaction of ClONO<sub>2</sub> with TiO<sub>2</sub> and SiO<sub>2</sub> aerosol particles: implications for stratospheric particle injection for climate engineering
title_sort heterogeneous reaction of clono<sub>2</sub> with tio<sub>2</sub> and sio<sub>2</sub> aerosol particles: implications for stratospheric particle injection for climate engineering
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
publishDate 2016-12-01
description Deliberate injection of aerosol particles into the stratosphere is a potential climate engineering scheme. Particles injected into the stratosphere would scatter solar radiation back to space, thereby reducing the temperature at the Earth's surface and hence the impacts of global warming. Minerals such as TiO<sub>2</sub> or SiO<sub>2</sub> are among the potentially suitable aerosol materials for stratospheric particle injection due to their greater light-scattering ability than stratospheric sulfuric acid particles. However, the heterogeneous reactivity of mineral particles towards trace gases important for stratospheric chemistry largely remains unknown, precluding reliable assessment of their impacts on stratospheric ozone, which is of key environmental significance. In this work we have investigated for the first time the heterogeneous hydrolysis of ClONO<sub>2</sub> on TiO<sub>2</sub> and SiO<sub>2</sub> aerosol particles at room temperature and at different relative humidities (RHs), using an aerosol flow tube. The uptake coefficient, <i>γ</i>(ClONO<sub>2</sub>), on TiO<sub>2</sub> was ∼ 1.2 × 10<sup>&minus;3</sup> at 7 % RH and remained unchanged at 33 % RH, and increased for SiO<sub>2</sub> from ∼ 2 × 10<sup>&minus;4</sup> at 7 % RH to  ∼ 5 × 10<sup>&minus;4</sup> at 35 % RH, reaching a value of  ∼ 6 × 10<sup>&minus;4</sup> at 59 % RH. We have also examined the impacts of a hypothetical TiO<sub>2</sub> injection on stratospheric chemistry using the UKCA (United Kingdom Chemistry and Aerosol) chemistry–climate model, in which heterogeneous hydrolysis of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> and ClONO<sub>2</sub> on TiO<sub>2</sub> particles is considered. A TiO<sub>2</sub> injection scenario with a solar-radiation scattering effect very similar to the eruption of Mt Pinatubo was constructed. It is found that, compared to the eruption of Mt Pinatubo, TiO<sub>2</sub> injection causes less ClO<sub><i>x</i></sub> activation and less ozone destruction in the lowermost stratosphere, while reduced depletion of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> in the middle stratosphere results in decreased ozone levels. Overall, no significant difference in the vertically integrated ozone abundances is found between TiO<sub>2</sub> injection and the eruption of Mt Pinatubo. Future work required to further assess the impacts of TiO<sub>2</sub> injection on stratospheric chemistry is also discussed.
url https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/16/15397/2016/acp-16-15397-2016.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mtang heterogeneousreactionofclonosub2subwithtiosub2subandsiosub2subaerosolparticlesimplicationsforstratosphericparticleinjectionforclimateengineering
AT mtang heterogeneousreactionofclonosub2subwithtiosub2subandsiosub2subaerosolparticlesimplicationsforstratosphericparticleinjectionforclimateengineering
AT mtang heterogeneousreactionofclonosub2subwithtiosub2subandsiosub2subaerosolparticlesimplicationsforstratosphericparticleinjectionforclimateengineering
AT jkeeble heterogeneousreactionofclonosub2subwithtiosub2subandsiosub2subaerosolparticlesimplicationsforstratosphericparticleinjectionforclimateengineering
AT pjtelford heterogeneousreactionofclonosub2subwithtiosub2subandsiosub2subaerosolparticlesimplicationsforstratosphericparticleinjectionforclimateengineering
AT pjtelford heterogeneousreactionofclonosub2subwithtiosub2subandsiosub2subaerosolparticlesimplicationsforstratosphericparticleinjectionforclimateengineering
AT fdpope heterogeneousreactionofclonosub2subwithtiosub2subandsiosub2subaerosolparticlesimplicationsforstratosphericparticleinjectionforclimateengineering
AT pbraesicke heterogeneousreactionofclonosub2subwithtiosub2subandsiosub2subaerosolparticlesimplicationsforstratosphericparticleinjectionforclimateengineering
AT ptgriffiths heterogeneousreactionofclonosub2subwithtiosub2subandsiosub2subaerosolparticlesimplicationsforstratosphericparticleinjectionforclimateengineering
AT ptgriffiths heterogeneousreactionofclonosub2subwithtiosub2subandsiosub2subaerosolparticlesimplicationsforstratosphericparticleinjectionforclimateengineering
AT nlabraham heterogeneousreactionofclonosub2subwithtiosub2subandsiosub2subaerosolparticlesimplicationsforstratosphericparticleinjectionforclimateengineering
AT nlabraham heterogeneousreactionofclonosub2subwithtiosub2subandsiosub2subaerosolparticlesimplicationsforstratosphericparticleinjectionforclimateengineering
AT jmcgregor heterogeneousreactionofclonosub2subwithtiosub2subandsiosub2subaerosolparticlesimplicationsforstratosphericparticleinjectionforclimateengineering
AT imwatson heterogeneousreactionofclonosub2subwithtiosub2subandsiosub2subaerosolparticlesimplicationsforstratosphericparticleinjectionforclimateengineering
AT racox heterogeneousreactionofclonosub2subwithtiosub2subandsiosub2subaerosolparticlesimplicationsforstratosphericparticleinjectionforclimateengineering
AT japyle heterogeneousreactionofclonosub2subwithtiosub2subandsiosub2subaerosolparticlesimplicationsforstratosphericparticleinjectionforclimateengineering
AT japyle heterogeneousreactionofclonosub2subwithtiosub2subandsiosub2subaerosolparticlesimplicationsforstratosphericparticleinjectionforclimateengineering
AT mkalberer heterogeneousreactionofclonosub2subwithtiosub2subandsiosub2subaerosolparticlesimplicationsforstratosphericparticleinjectionforclimateengineering
_version_ 1725847002271449088
spelling doaj-f174d6ff45f848aea09f8d67e77584052020-11-24T21:59:50ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242016-12-0116153971541210.5194/acp-16-15397-2016Heterogeneous reaction of ClONO<sub>2</sub> with TiO<sub>2</sub> and SiO<sub>2</sub> aerosol particles: implications for stratospheric particle injection for climate engineeringM. Tang0M. Tang1M. Tang2J. Keeble3P. J. Telford4P. J. Telford5F. D. Pope6P. Braesicke7P. T. Griffiths8P. T. Griffiths9N. L. Abraham10N. L. Abraham11J. McGregor12I. M. Watson13R. A. Cox14J. A. Pyle15J. A. Pyle16M. Kalberer17Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UKSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UKState Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, ChinaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UKDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UKNational Centre for Atmospheric Science, NCAS, Cambridge, UKSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UKIMK-ASF, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, GermanyDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UKNational Centre for Atmospheric Science, NCAS, Cambridge, UKDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UKNational Centre for Atmospheric Science, NCAS, Cambridge, UKDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, UKSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UKDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UKDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UKNational Centre for Atmospheric Science, NCAS, Cambridge, UKDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UKDeliberate injection of aerosol particles into the stratosphere is a potential climate engineering scheme. Particles injected into the stratosphere would scatter solar radiation back to space, thereby reducing the temperature at the Earth's surface and hence the impacts of global warming. Minerals such as TiO<sub>2</sub> or SiO<sub>2</sub> are among the potentially suitable aerosol materials for stratospheric particle injection due to their greater light-scattering ability than stratospheric sulfuric acid particles. However, the heterogeneous reactivity of mineral particles towards trace gases important for stratospheric chemistry largely remains unknown, precluding reliable assessment of their impacts on stratospheric ozone, which is of key environmental significance. In this work we have investigated for the first time the heterogeneous hydrolysis of ClONO<sub>2</sub> on TiO<sub>2</sub> and SiO<sub>2</sub> aerosol particles at room temperature and at different relative humidities (RHs), using an aerosol flow tube. The uptake coefficient, <i>γ</i>(ClONO<sub>2</sub>), on TiO<sub>2</sub> was ∼ 1.2 × 10<sup>&minus;3</sup> at 7 % RH and remained unchanged at 33 % RH, and increased for SiO<sub>2</sub> from ∼ 2 × 10<sup>&minus;4</sup> at 7 % RH to  ∼ 5 × 10<sup>&minus;4</sup> at 35 % RH, reaching a value of  ∼ 6 × 10<sup>&minus;4</sup> at 59 % RH. We have also examined the impacts of a hypothetical TiO<sub>2</sub> injection on stratospheric chemistry using the UKCA (United Kingdom Chemistry and Aerosol) chemistry–climate model, in which heterogeneous hydrolysis of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> and ClONO<sub>2</sub> on TiO<sub>2</sub> particles is considered. A TiO<sub>2</sub> injection scenario with a solar-radiation scattering effect very similar to the eruption of Mt Pinatubo was constructed. It is found that, compared to the eruption of Mt Pinatubo, TiO<sub>2</sub> injection causes less ClO<sub><i>x</i></sub> activation and less ozone destruction in the lowermost stratosphere, while reduced depletion of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> in the middle stratosphere results in decreased ozone levels. Overall, no significant difference in the vertically integrated ozone abundances is found between TiO<sub>2</sub> injection and the eruption of Mt Pinatubo. Future work required to further assess the impacts of TiO<sub>2</sub> injection on stratospheric chemistry is also discussed.https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/16/15397/2016/acp-16-15397-2016.pdf