Efficient storage of heterogeneous geospatial data in spatial databases

Abstract The no-schema approach of NoSQL document stores is a tempting solution for importing heterogenous geospatial data to a spatial database. However, this approach means sacrificing the benefits of RDBMSes, such as existing integrations and the ACID principle. Previous comparisons of the docume...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Atle Frenvik Sveen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-11-01
Series:Journal of Big Data
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40537-019-0262-8
id doaj-f18d69fff9a44fbfb071dbe283299190
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f18d69fff9a44fbfb071dbe2832991902020-11-25T04:10:48ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Big Data2196-11152019-11-016111410.1186/s40537-019-0262-8Efficient storage of heterogeneous geospatial data in spatial databasesAtle Frenvik Sveen0Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyAbstract The no-schema approach of NoSQL document stores is a tempting solution for importing heterogenous geospatial data to a spatial database. However, this approach means sacrificing the benefits of RDBMSes, such as existing integrations and the ACID principle. Previous comparisons of the document-store and table-based layout for storing geospatial data favours the document-store approach but does not consider importing data that can be segmented into homogenous datasets. In this paper we propose “The Heterogeneous Open Geodata Storage (HOGS)” system. HOGS is a command line utility that automates the process of importing geospatial data to a PostgreSQL/PostGIS database. It is developed in order to compare the performance of a traditional storage layout adhering to the ACID principle, and a NoSQL-inspired document store. A collection of eight open geospatial datasets comprising 15 million features was imported and queried in order to compare the differences between the two storage layouts. The results from a quantitative experiment are presented and shows that large amounts of open geospatial data can be stored using traditional RDBMSes using a table-based layout without any performance penalties.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40537-019-0262-8NoSQLDocument-storeGeospatial dataSpatial databaseRelational databaseDatabase benchmark
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Atle Frenvik Sveen
spellingShingle Atle Frenvik Sveen
Efficient storage of heterogeneous geospatial data in spatial databases
Journal of Big Data
NoSQL
Document-store
Geospatial data
Spatial database
Relational database
Database benchmark
author_facet Atle Frenvik Sveen
author_sort Atle Frenvik Sveen
title Efficient storage of heterogeneous geospatial data in spatial databases
title_short Efficient storage of heterogeneous geospatial data in spatial databases
title_full Efficient storage of heterogeneous geospatial data in spatial databases
title_fullStr Efficient storage of heterogeneous geospatial data in spatial databases
title_full_unstemmed Efficient storage of heterogeneous geospatial data in spatial databases
title_sort efficient storage of heterogeneous geospatial data in spatial databases
publisher SpringerOpen
series Journal of Big Data
issn 2196-1115
publishDate 2019-11-01
description Abstract The no-schema approach of NoSQL document stores is a tempting solution for importing heterogenous geospatial data to a spatial database. However, this approach means sacrificing the benefits of RDBMSes, such as existing integrations and the ACID principle. Previous comparisons of the document-store and table-based layout for storing geospatial data favours the document-store approach but does not consider importing data that can be segmented into homogenous datasets. In this paper we propose “The Heterogeneous Open Geodata Storage (HOGS)” system. HOGS is a command line utility that automates the process of importing geospatial data to a PostgreSQL/PostGIS database. It is developed in order to compare the performance of a traditional storage layout adhering to the ACID principle, and a NoSQL-inspired document store. A collection of eight open geospatial datasets comprising 15 million features was imported and queried in order to compare the differences between the two storage layouts. The results from a quantitative experiment are presented and shows that large amounts of open geospatial data can be stored using traditional RDBMSes using a table-based layout without any performance penalties.
topic NoSQL
Document-store
Geospatial data
Spatial database
Relational database
Database benchmark
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40537-019-0262-8
work_keys_str_mv AT atlefrenviksveen efficientstorageofheterogeneousgeospatialdatainspatialdatabases
_version_ 1724419213482786816