Àlvaro Siza and the Fragmented City

In Álvaro Siza’s work, between 1970 and 1980, the presence of the ruin results from his quest for a methodology that allows the inclusion of the city’s past and its remains as an important starting point to embrace reality in its broadest sense. Ruins found in the place were preserved as important r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Carlos Machado
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Athens Institute for Education and Research 2015-07-01
Series:Athens Journal of Architecture
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.athensjournals.gr/architecture/2015-1-3-1-Machado.pdf
id doaj-f1d2fdbdf2c34243a07f98de75efbd2a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f1d2fdbdf2c34243a07f98de75efbd2a2020-11-25T03:59:06ZengAthens Institute for Education and ResearchAthens Journal of Architecture2407-94722015-07-0113177186https://doi.org/10.30958/aja.1-3-1Àlvaro Siza and the Fragmented CityCarlos Machado0PhD Architect, Researcher at FAUP Architecture and Urbanism Study Center (CEAU)/Group: Architecture: Theory, Project and History, PortugalIn Álvaro Siza’s work, between 1970 and 1980, the presence of the ruin results from his quest for a methodology that allows the inclusion of the city’s past and its remains as an important starting point to embrace reality in its broadest sense. Ruins found in the place were preserved as important references for the project to come. Proposed new forms were sometimes fragmented and the broken surfaces were used to relate or to bring together different aspects of reality. However, there were also invented ruins, intended as such and built as mediators between the pre-existing buildings and the new ones. Alvar Aalto and Fernando Távora, both important in Siza’s upbringing, had previously addressed the same theme – the Muuratsalo experimental house by Aalto and the Quinta da Conceição Park in Matosinhos by Távora are good examples of the use of the fragmented form. They paved the way to Siza’s practice as a mature architect. For Siza, there is no difference between architecture and urbanism. Aldo Rossi advocated the same idea, speaking of the transformation of monuments into city spaces and of the city distinguished by its various parts, studied and designed as such. The transformation of urban monuments over time and the conviction that the understanding of the city must come from the multiple inter-relations of its different singularities, also explains Siza’s fascination with the fragment and the collage, thus allowing to interpret his sketches where broken angels and architectural fragments come together and interact.https://www.athensjournals.gr/architecture/2015-1-3-1-Machado.pdfálvaro sizacityfragmentruin
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carlos Machado
spellingShingle Carlos Machado
Àlvaro Siza and the Fragmented City
Athens Journal of Architecture
álvaro siza
city
fragment
ruin
author_facet Carlos Machado
author_sort Carlos Machado
title Àlvaro Siza and the Fragmented City
title_short Àlvaro Siza and the Fragmented City
title_full Àlvaro Siza and the Fragmented City
title_fullStr Àlvaro Siza and the Fragmented City
title_full_unstemmed Àlvaro Siza and the Fragmented City
title_sort àlvaro siza and the fragmented city
publisher Athens Institute for Education and Research
series Athens Journal of Architecture
issn 2407-9472
publishDate 2015-07-01
description In Álvaro Siza’s work, between 1970 and 1980, the presence of the ruin results from his quest for a methodology that allows the inclusion of the city’s past and its remains as an important starting point to embrace reality in its broadest sense. Ruins found in the place were preserved as important references for the project to come. Proposed new forms were sometimes fragmented and the broken surfaces were used to relate or to bring together different aspects of reality. However, there were also invented ruins, intended as such and built as mediators between the pre-existing buildings and the new ones. Alvar Aalto and Fernando Távora, both important in Siza’s upbringing, had previously addressed the same theme – the Muuratsalo experimental house by Aalto and the Quinta da Conceição Park in Matosinhos by Távora are good examples of the use of the fragmented form. They paved the way to Siza’s practice as a mature architect. For Siza, there is no difference between architecture and urbanism. Aldo Rossi advocated the same idea, speaking of the transformation of monuments into city spaces and of the city distinguished by its various parts, studied and designed as such. The transformation of urban monuments over time and the conviction that the understanding of the city must come from the multiple inter-relations of its different singularities, also explains Siza’s fascination with the fragment and the collage, thus allowing to interpret his sketches where broken angels and architectural fragments come together and interact.
topic álvaro siza
city
fragment
ruin
url https://www.athensjournals.gr/architecture/2015-1-3-1-Machado.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT carlosmachado alvarosizaandthefragmentedcity
_version_ 1724455442087673856