The utility of endotracheal aspirate bacteriology in identifying mechanically ventilated patients at risk for ventilator associated pneumonia: a single-center prospective observational study

Abstract Background Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a well-known, life-threatening disease that persists despite preventative measures and approved antibiotic therapies. This prospective observational study investigated bacterial airway colonization, and whether its detection and quantifica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ekaterina Kabak, Jana Hudcova, Zoltán Magyarics, Lukas Stulik, Marie Goggin, Valéria Szijártó, Eszter Nagy, Chris Stevens
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-08-01
Series:BMC Infectious Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12879-019-4367-7
id doaj-f1dc0487f7f74c92a0cdd8be96c2686c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f1dc0487f7f74c92a0cdd8be96c2686c2020-11-25T03:57:42ZengBMCBMC Infectious Diseases1471-23342019-08-0119111310.1186/s12879-019-4367-7The utility of endotracheal aspirate bacteriology in identifying mechanically ventilated patients at risk for ventilator associated pneumonia: a single-center prospective observational studyEkaterina Kabak0Jana Hudcova1Zoltán Magyarics2Lukas Stulik3Marie Goggin4Valéria Szijártó5Eszter Nagy6Chris Stevens7Previously Arsanis Biosciences GmbHLahey Hospital and Medical CenterX4 Pharmaceuticals IncX4 Pharmaceuticals IncLahey Hospital and Medical CenterCEBINA (Central European Biotech Incubator and Accelerator) GmbHCEBINA (Central European Biotech Incubator and Accelerator) GmbHPreviously Arsanis Biosciences GmbHAbstract Background Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a well-known, life-threatening disease that persists despite preventative measures and approved antibiotic therapies. This prospective observational study investigated bacterial airway colonization, and whether its detection and quantification in the endotracheal aspirate (ETA) is useful for identifying mechanically ventilated ICU patients who are at risk of developing VAP. Methods 240 patients admitted to 3 ICUs at the Lahey Hospital and Medical Center (Burlington, MA) between June 2014 and June 2015 and mechanically ventilated for > 2 days were included. ETA samples and clinical data were collected. Airway colonization was assessed, and subsequently categorized into “heavy” and “light” by semi-quantitative microbiological analysis of ETAs. VAP was diagnosed retrospectively by the study sponsor according to a pre-specified pneumonia definition. Results Pathogenic bacteria were isolated from ETAs of 125 patients. The most common species isolated was S. aureus (56.8%), followed by K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli (35.2% combined). VAP was diagnosed in 85 patients, 44 (51.7%) with no bacterial pathogen, 18 associated with S. aureus and 18 Gram-negative-only cases, and 5 associated with other Gram-positive or mixed species. A higher proportion of patients who were heavily colonized with S. aureus developed VAP (32.4%) associated with S. aureus compared to those lightly colonized (17.6%). The same tendency was seen for patients heavily and lightly colonized with Gram-negative pathogens (30.0 and 0.0%, respectively). Detection of S. aureus in the ETA preceded S. aureus VAP by approximately 4 days, while Gram-negative organisms were first detected 2.5 days prior to Gram-negative VAP. VAP was associated with significantly longer duration of mechanical ventilation and hospitalization regardless of microbiologic cause when compared to patients who did not develop VAP. Conclusions The overall VAP rate was 35%. Heavy tracheal colonization supported identification of patients at higher risk of developing a corresponding S. aureus or Gram-negative VAP. Detection of bacterial ETA-positivity tended to precede VAP.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12879-019-4367-7Ventilator-associated pneumoniaEndotracheal aspirateStaphylococcus aureusGram-negative pathogensProspective study
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ekaterina Kabak
Jana Hudcova
Zoltán Magyarics
Lukas Stulik
Marie Goggin
Valéria Szijártó
Eszter Nagy
Chris Stevens
spellingShingle Ekaterina Kabak
Jana Hudcova
Zoltán Magyarics
Lukas Stulik
Marie Goggin
Valéria Szijártó
Eszter Nagy
Chris Stevens
The utility of endotracheal aspirate bacteriology in identifying mechanically ventilated patients at risk for ventilator associated pneumonia: a single-center prospective observational study
BMC Infectious Diseases
Ventilator-associated pneumonia
Endotracheal aspirate
Staphylococcus aureus
Gram-negative pathogens
Prospective study
author_facet Ekaterina Kabak
Jana Hudcova
Zoltán Magyarics
Lukas Stulik
Marie Goggin
Valéria Szijártó
Eszter Nagy
Chris Stevens
author_sort Ekaterina Kabak
title The utility of endotracheal aspirate bacteriology in identifying mechanically ventilated patients at risk for ventilator associated pneumonia: a single-center prospective observational study
title_short The utility of endotracheal aspirate bacteriology in identifying mechanically ventilated patients at risk for ventilator associated pneumonia: a single-center prospective observational study
title_full The utility of endotracheal aspirate bacteriology in identifying mechanically ventilated patients at risk for ventilator associated pneumonia: a single-center prospective observational study
title_fullStr The utility of endotracheal aspirate bacteriology in identifying mechanically ventilated patients at risk for ventilator associated pneumonia: a single-center prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed The utility of endotracheal aspirate bacteriology in identifying mechanically ventilated patients at risk for ventilator associated pneumonia: a single-center prospective observational study
title_sort utility of endotracheal aspirate bacteriology in identifying mechanically ventilated patients at risk for ventilator associated pneumonia: a single-center prospective observational study
publisher BMC
series BMC Infectious Diseases
issn 1471-2334
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Abstract Background Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a well-known, life-threatening disease that persists despite preventative measures and approved antibiotic therapies. This prospective observational study investigated bacterial airway colonization, and whether its detection and quantification in the endotracheal aspirate (ETA) is useful for identifying mechanically ventilated ICU patients who are at risk of developing VAP. Methods 240 patients admitted to 3 ICUs at the Lahey Hospital and Medical Center (Burlington, MA) between June 2014 and June 2015 and mechanically ventilated for > 2 days were included. ETA samples and clinical data were collected. Airway colonization was assessed, and subsequently categorized into “heavy” and “light” by semi-quantitative microbiological analysis of ETAs. VAP was diagnosed retrospectively by the study sponsor according to a pre-specified pneumonia definition. Results Pathogenic bacteria were isolated from ETAs of 125 patients. The most common species isolated was S. aureus (56.8%), followed by K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli (35.2% combined). VAP was diagnosed in 85 patients, 44 (51.7%) with no bacterial pathogen, 18 associated with S. aureus and 18 Gram-negative-only cases, and 5 associated with other Gram-positive or mixed species. A higher proportion of patients who were heavily colonized with S. aureus developed VAP (32.4%) associated with S. aureus compared to those lightly colonized (17.6%). The same tendency was seen for patients heavily and lightly colonized with Gram-negative pathogens (30.0 and 0.0%, respectively). Detection of S. aureus in the ETA preceded S. aureus VAP by approximately 4 days, while Gram-negative organisms were first detected 2.5 days prior to Gram-negative VAP. VAP was associated with significantly longer duration of mechanical ventilation and hospitalization regardless of microbiologic cause when compared to patients who did not develop VAP. Conclusions The overall VAP rate was 35%. Heavy tracheal colonization supported identification of patients at higher risk of developing a corresponding S. aureus or Gram-negative VAP. Detection of bacterial ETA-positivity tended to precede VAP.
topic Ventilator-associated pneumonia
Endotracheal aspirate
Staphylococcus aureus
Gram-negative pathogens
Prospective study
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12879-019-4367-7
work_keys_str_mv AT ekaterinakabak theutilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT janahudcova theutilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT zoltanmagyarics theutilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT lukasstulik theutilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT mariegoggin theutilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT valeriaszijarto theutilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT eszternagy theutilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT chrisstevens theutilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT ekaterinakabak utilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT janahudcova utilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT zoltanmagyarics utilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT lukasstulik utilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT mariegoggin utilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT valeriaszijarto utilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT eszternagy utilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT chrisstevens utilityofendotrachealaspiratebacteriologyinidentifyingmechanicallyventilatedpatientsatriskforventilatorassociatedpneumoniaasinglecenterprospectiveobservationalstudy
_version_ 1724459166058151936