Assessing the impact of a research funder's recommendation to consider core outcome sets.
<h4>Background</h4>Core outcome sets (COS) have the potential to reduce waste in research by improving the consistency of outcomes measured in trials of the same health condition. However, this reduction in waste will only be realised through the uptake of COS by clinical trialists. With...
Main Authors: | Karen L Hughes, Jamie J Kirkham, Mike Clarke, Paula R Williamson |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2019-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222418 |
Similar Items
-
Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations.
by: Jamie J Kirkham, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01) -
Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider
by: Williamson Paula R, et al.
Published: (2012-08-01) -
Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups
by: Kirkham Jamie J, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Assessing the relevance and uptake of core outcome sets (an agreed minimum collection of outcomes to measure in research studies) in Cochrane systematic reviews: a review
by: Karen Hughes, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01) -
Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement
by: Jamie J. Kirkham, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01)