Effects of action observation therapy and mirror therapy after stroke on rehabilitation outcomes and neural mechanisms by MEG: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Loss of upper-extremity motor function is one of the most debilitating deficits following stroke. Two promising treatment approaches, action observation therapy (AOT) and mirror therapy (MT), aim to enhance motor learning and promote neural reorganization in patients through diff...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tsai-yu Shih, Ching-yi Wu, Keh-chung Lin, Chia-hsiung Cheng, Yu-wei Hsieh, Chia-ling Chen, Chih-jou Lai, Chih-chi Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-10-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-2205-z
id doaj-f245647126f745b9b08479fb9a271163
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f245647126f745b9b08479fb9a2711632020-11-24T20:56:59ZengBMCTrials1745-62152017-10-011811810.1186/s13063-017-2205-zEffects of action observation therapy and mirror therapy after stroke on rehabilitation outcomes and neural mechanisms by MEG: study protocol for a randomized controlled trialTsai-yu Shih0Ching-yi Wu1Keh-chung Lin2Chia-hsiung Cheng3Yu-wei Hsieh4Chia-ling Chen5Chih-jou Lai6Chih-chi Chen7Department of Occupational Therapy and Graduate Institute of Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung UniversityDepartment of Occupational Therapy and Graduate Institute of Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung UniversitySchool of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan UniversityDepartment of Occupational Therapy and Graduate Institute of Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung UniversityDepartment of Occupational Therapy and Graduate Institute of Behavioral Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung UniversityDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial HospitalDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Veterans General HospitalDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial HospitalAbstract Background Loss of upper-extremity motor function is one of the most debilitating deficits following stroke. Two promising treatment approaches, action observation therapy (AOT) and mirror therapy (MT), aim to enhance motor learning and promote neural reorganization in patients through different afferent inputs and patterns of visual feedback. Both approaches involve different patterns of motor observation, imitation, and execution but share some similar neural bases of the mirror neuron system. AOT and MT used in stroke rehabilitation may confer differential benefits and neural activities that remain to be determined. This clinical trial aims to investigate and compare treatment effects and neural activity changes of AOT and MT with those of the control intervention in patients with subacute stroke. Methods/design An estimated total of 90 patients with subacute stroke will be recruited for this study. All participants will be randomly assigned to receive AOT, MT, or control intervention for a 3-week training period (15 sessions). Outcome measurements will be taken at baseline, immediately after treatment, and at the 3-month follow-up. For the magnetoencephalography (MEG) study, we anticipate that we will recruit 12 to 15 patients per group. The primary outcome will be the Fugl-Meyer Assessment score. Secondary outcomes will include the modified Rankin Scale, the Box and Block Test, the ABILHAND questionnaire, the Questionnaire Upon Mental Imagery, the Functional Independence Measure, activity monitors, the Stroke Impact Scale version 3.0, and MEG signals. Discussion This clinical trial will provide scientific evidence of treatment effects on motor, functional outcomes, and neural activity mechanisms after AOT and MT in patients with subacute stroke. Further application and use of AOT and MT may include telerehabilitation or home-based rehabilitation through web-based or video teaching. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02871700 . Registered on 1 August 2016.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-2205-zStrokeNeurorehabilitationAction observationMirror therapyMagnetoencephalography
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tsai-yu Shih
Ching-yi Wu
Keh-chung Lin
Chia-hsiung Cheng
Yu-wei Hsieh
Chia-ling Chen
Chih-jou Lai
Chih-chi Chen
spellingShingle Tsai-yu Shih
Ching-yi Wu
Keh-chung Lin
Chia-hsiung Cheng
Yu-wei Hsieh
Chia-ling Chen
Chih-jou Lai
Chih-chi Chen
Effects of action observation therapy and mirror therapy after stroke on rehabilitation outcomes and neural mechanisms by MEG: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Trials
Stroke
Neurorehabilitation
Action observation
Mirror therapy
Magnetoencephalography
author_facet Tsai-yu Shih
Ching-yi Wu
Keh-chung Lin
Chia-hsiung Cheng
Yu-wei Hsieh
Chia-ling Chen
Chih-jou Lai
Chih-chi Chen
author_sort Tsai-yu Shih
title Effects of action observation therapy and mirror therapy after stroke on rehabilitation outcomes and neural mechanisms by MEG: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Effects of action observation therapy and mirror therapy after stroke on rehabilitation outcomes and neural mechanisms by MEG: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Effects of action observation therapy and mirror therapy after stroke on rehabilitation outcomes and neural mechanisms by MEG: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Effects of action observation therapy and mirror therapy after stroke on rehabilitation outcomes and neural mechanisms by MEG: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of action observation therapy and mirror therapy after stroke on rehabilitation outcomes and neural mechanisms by MEG: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort effects of action observation therapy and mirror therapy after stroke on rehabilitation outcomes and neural mechanisms by meg: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
publisher BMC
series Trials
issn 1745-6215
publishDate 2017-10-01
description Abstract Background Loss of upper-extremity motor function is one of the most debilitating deficits following stroke. Two promising treatment approaches, action observation therapy (AOT) and mirror therapy (MT), aim to enhance motor learning and promote neural reorganization in patients through different afferent inputs and patterns of visual feedback. Both approaches involve different patterns of motor observation, imitation, and execution but share some similar neural bases of the mirror neuron system. AOT and MT used in stroke rehabilitation may confer differential benefits and neural activities that remain to be determined. This clinical trial aims to investigate and compare treatment effects and neural activity changes of AOT and MT with those of the control intervention in patients with subacute stroke. Methods/design An estimated total of 90 patients with subacute stroke will be recruited for this study. All participants will be randomly assigned to receive AOT, MT, or control intervention for a 3-week training period (15 sessions). Outcome measurements will be taken at baseline, immediately after treatment, and at the 3-month follow-up. For the magnetoencephalography (MEG) study, we anticipate that we will recruit 12 to 15 patients per group. The primary outcome will be the Fugl-Meyer Assessment score. Secondary outcomes will include the modified Rankin Scale, the Box and Block Test, the ABILHAND questionnaire, the Questionnaire Upon Mental Imagery, the Functional Independence Measure, activity monitors, the Stroke Impact Scale version 3.0, and MEG signals. Discussion This clinical trial will provide scientific evidence of treatment effects on motor, functional outcomes, and neural activity mechanisms after AOT and MT in patients with subacute stroke. Further application and use of AOT and MT may include telerehabilitation or home-based rehabilitation through web-based or video teaching. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02871700 . Registered on 1 August 2016.
topic Stroke
Neurorehabilitation
Action observation
Mirror therapy
Magnetoencephalography
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-2205-z
work_keys_str_mv AT tsaiyushih effectsofactionobservationtherapyandmirrortherapyafterstrokeonrehabilitationoutcomesandneuralmechanismsbymegstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chingyiwu effectsofactionobservationtherapyandmirrortherapyafterstrokeonrehabilitationoutcomesandneuralmechanismsbymegstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kehchunglin effectsofactionobservationtherapyandmirrortherapyafterstrokeonrehabilitationoutcomesandneuralmechanismsbymegstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chiahsiungcheng effectsofactionobservationtherapyandmirrortherapyafterstrokeonrehabilitationoutcomesandneuralmechanismsbymegstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yuweihsieh effectsofactionobservationtherapyandmirrortherapyafterstrokeonrehabilitationoutcomesandneuralmechanismsbymegstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chialingchen effectsofactionobservationtherapyandmirrortherapyafterstrokeonrehabilitationoutcomesandneuralmechanismsbymegstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chihjoulai effectsofactionobservationtherapyandmirrortherapyafterstrokeonrehabilitationoutcomesandneuralmechanismsbymegstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chihchichen effectsofactionobservationtherapyandmirrortherapyafterstrokeonrehabilitationoutcomesandneuralmechanismsbymegstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1716789165516914688