EFFICACY OF ENDURANCE TRAINING ON DEEP CERVICAL FLEXOR MUSCLES USING PRESSURE FEEDBACK IN MECHANICAL NECK PAIN

Background: Mechanical neck pain is most prevalent in middle age and a common condition affecting 22 % to 70% of the general population. While the exact aetiology of the pain is unknown, most of the mechanical pain is due to mechanical factors such as sprains and strains of the neck muscles or ligam...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M Karthi, A D Gopalswami, Antony Leo Aseer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IJPHY 2019-06-01
Series:International Journal of Physiotherapy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ijphy.org/index.php/journal/article/view/424
id doaj-f249b6e11be245a199472bc5390240d5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f249b6e11be245a199472bc5390240d52020-11-25T00:20:05ZengIJPHYInternational Journal of Physiotherapy2349-59872348-83362019-06-01639510110.15621/ijphy/2019/v6i3/183878EFFICACY OF ENDURANCE TRAINING ON DEEP CERVICAL FLEXOR MUSCLES USING PRESSURE FEEDBACK IN MECHANICAL NECK PAIN M Karthi 0A D Gopalswami 1Antony Leo Aseer 2Post graduate student, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Porur, Chennai – 600116. Associate Professor, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Porur, Chennai – 600116. Professor, faculty of Physiotherapy, Sri Ramachandra Institute of higher education and research, Porur, Chennai 600116. Background: Mechanical neck pain is most prevalent in middle age and a common condition affecting 22 % to 70% of the general population. While the exact aetiology of the pain is unknown, most of the mechanical pain is due to mechanical factors such as sprains and strains of the neck muscles or ligaments. Methods: 60 subjects (male 33, female 27) with mechanical neck pain who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were chosen. After baseline evaluation of history, NPRS, cervical range of motion and Deep Cervical Flexor Endurance (DCF), the subjects were allocated into three groups which received DCF training by modifying the use of pressure biofeedback. Group 1 received DCF Training with Visual Pressure Biofeedback 10 repetition for three sets. Group 2 received DCF training without Visual Pressure Biofeedback 10 repetition three sets. And Group 3 received DCF training with Pressure Biofeedback (without visual input) 3 set of 10 repetitions. After 15 days of intervention, post-intervention measures of the variables were obtained. Results: Data were analyzed using SPSS 1 version. Between-group analyses showed that subjects in Group 1 have a statistically and clinically significant improvement (p-value< .005), pain (NPRS), cervical ROM, DCF endurance and Neck Disability Index when compared to the Group 2 and 3. The pre and post values for all the three groups within the group analysis showed a statistical and clinically significant difference. Conclusion: Deep Cervical Flexor Training with Visual Pressure Biofeedback provides better clinical improvement in terms of pain reduction, cervical flexion and extension ROM, DCF endurance, and Neck Disability Index score.https://www.ijphy.org/index.php/journal/article/view/424mechanical neck paindeep cervical flexor trainingbubble inclinometerrange of motion
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M Karthi
A D Gopalswami
Antony Leo Aseer
spellingShingle M Karthi
A D Gopalswami
Antony Leo Aseer
EFFICACY OF ENDURANCE TRAINING ON DEEP CERVICAL FLEXOR MUSCLES USING PRESSURE FEEDBACK IN MECHANICAL NECK PAIN
International Journal of Physiotherapy
mechanical neck pain
deep cervical flexor training
bubble inclinometer
range of motion
author_facet M Karthi
A D Gopalswami
Antony Leo Aseer
author_sort M Karthi
title EFFICACY OF ENDURANCE TRAINING ON DEEP CERVICAL FLEXOR MUSCLES USING PRESSURE FEEDBACK IN MECHANICAL NECK PAIN
title_short EFFICACY OF ENDURANCE TRAINING ON DEEP CERVICAL FLEXOR MUSCLES USING PRESSURE FEEDBACK IN MECHANICAL NECK PAIN
title_full EFFICACY OF ENDURANCE TRAINING ON DEEP CERVICAL FLEXOR MUSCLES USING PRESSURE FEEDBACK IN MECHANICAL NECK PAIN
title_fullStr EFFICACY OF ENDURANCE TRAINING ON DEEP CERVICAL FLEXOR MUSCLES USING PRESSURE FEEDBACK IN MECHANICAL NECK PAIN
title_full_unstemmed EFFICACY OF ENDURANCE TRAINING ON DEEP CERVICAL FLEXOR MUSCLES USING PRESSURE FEEDBACK IN MECHANICAL NECK PAIN
title_sort efficacy of endurance training on deep cervical flexor muscles using pressure feedback in mechanical neck pain
publisher IJPHY
series International Journal of Physiotherapy
issn 2349-5987
2348-8336
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Background: Mechanical neck pain is most prevalent in middle age and a common condition affecting 22 % to 70% of the general population. While the exact aetiology of the pain is unknown, most of the mechanical pain is due to mechanical factors such as sprains and strains of the neck muscles or ligaments. Methods: 60 subjects (male 33, female 27) with mechanical neck pain who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were chosen. After baseline evaluation of history, NPRS, cervical range of motion and Deep Cervical Flexor Endurance (DCF), the subjects were allocated into three groups which received DCF training by modifying the use of pressure biofeedback. Group 1 received DCF Training with Visual Pressure Biofeedback 10 repetition for three sets. Group 2 received DCF training without Visual Pressure Biofeedback 10 repetition three sets. And Group 3 received DCF training with Pressure Biofeedback (without visual input) 3 set of 10 repetitions. After 15 days of intervention, post-intervention measures of the variables were obtained. Results: Data were analyzed using SPSS 1 version. Between-group analyses showed that subjects in Group 1 have a statistically and clinically significant improvement (p-value< .005), pain (NPRS), cervical ROM, DCF endurance and Neck Disability Index when compared to the Group 2 and 3. The pre and post values for all the three groups within the group analysis showed a statistical and clinically significant difference. Conclusion: Deep Cervical Flexor Training with Visual Pressure Biofeedback provides better clinical improvement in terms of pain reduction, cervical flexion and extension ROM, DCF endurance, and Neck Disability Index score.
topic mechanical neck pain
deep cervical flexor training
bubble inclinometer
range of motion
url https://www.ijphy.org/index.php/journal/article/view/424
work_keys_str_mv AT mkarthi efficacyofendurancetrainingondeepcervicalflexormusclesusingpressurefeedbackinmechanicalneckpain
AT adgopalswami efficacyofendurancetrainingondeepcervicalflexormusclesusingpressurefeedbackinmechanicalneckpain
AT antonyleoaseer efficacyofendurancetrainingondeepcervicalflexormusclesusingpressurefeedbackinmechanicalneckpain
_version_ 1725369257847422976