FOSP’S “Publishing Passion”: on the Materials Held in the Department of Manuscripts of the IWL RAS

This article based on the archival material from the Department of manuscripts of IWL RAN discusses the hitherto understudied financial and ideological conditions of the Publishing house of the Federation of Associations of Soviet writers (FOSP) “Federation.” According to the Charter, the Publishing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daria S. Moskovskaya, Elena D. Galtsova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences 2020-12-01
Series:Studia Litterarum
Subjects:
Online Access:http://studlit.ru/images/2020-5-4/Moskovskaya_Galtsova.pdf
id doaj-f26fd4450e0b40bd8017c94bddb97cf8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f26fd4450e0b40bd8017c94bddb97cf82020-12-13T14:07:19ZengA.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of SciencesStudia Litterarum2500-42472541-85642020-12-015439441910.22455/2500-4247-2020-5-4-394-419FOSP’S “Publishing Passion”: on the Materials Held in the Department of Manuscripts of the IWL RAS Daria S. Moskovskaya0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8089-9604Elena D. Galtsova1A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of SciencesA.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of SciencesThis article based on the archival material from the Department of manuscripts of IWL RAN discusses the hitherto understudied financial and ideological conditions of the Publishing house of the Federation of Associations of Soviet writers (FOSP) “Federation.” According to the Charter, the Publishing house was a self-financing public publishing house of national significance, enjoying all the rights of a legal entity, and the FOSP was not responsible for its financial activities FOSP. In 1927–1930s, the publishing house sought to be commercially successful. In the 1930s, it submitted to ideological demands and became unprofitable. The ideological dictate and the policy of “prolitarization” led to the fact that in 1931–1932, translation department in the Leningrad branch of FOSP was eliminated and Moscow translation department was eliminated as well. The hithertop unpublished correspondence of the FOSP on the “case of A.K. Vinogradov” as a member of the Moscow section describes circumstances and gives reasons explaining Vinogradov’s refusal to keep translating and his preference of literary criticism and creative writing in the 1930s and 1940s.http://studlit.ru/images/2020-5-4/Moskovskaya_Galtsova.pdffinancing of literaturefederation of associations of soviet writerscommercial success“proletarization” translation departmenteditingcensorshipa.k. vinogradovpublishing housearchival publication.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daria S. Moskovskaya
Elena D. Galtsova
spellingShingle Daria S. Moskovskaya
Elena D. Galtsova
FOSP’S “Publishing Passion”: on the Materials Held in the Department of Manuscripts of the IWL RAS
Studia Litterarum
financing of literature
federation of associations of soviet writers
commercial success
“proletarization
” translation department
editing
censorship
a.k. vinogradov
publishing house
archival publication.
author_facet Daria S. Moskovskaya
Elena D. Galtsova
author_sort Daria S. Moskovskaya
title FOSP’S “Publishing Passion”: on the Materials Held in the Department of Manuscripts of the IWL RAS
title_short FOSP’S “Publishing Passion”: on the Materials Held in the Department of Manuscripts of the IWL RAS
title_full FOSP’S “Publishing Passion”: on the Materials Held in the Department of Manuscripts of the IWL RAS
title_fullStr FOSP’S “Publishing Passion”: on the Materials Held in the Department of Manuscripts of the IWL RAS
title_full_unstemmed FOSP’S “Publishing Passion”: on the Materials Held in the Department of Manuscripts of the IWL RAS
title_sort fosp’s “publishing passion”: on the materials held in the department of manuscripts of the iwl ras
publisher A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences
series Studia Litterarum
issn 2500-4247
2541-8564
publishDate 2020-12-01
description This article based on the archival material from the Department of manuscripts of IWL RAN discusses the hitherto understudied financial and ideological conditions of the Publishing house of the Federation of Associations of Soviet writers (FOSP) “Federation.” According to the Charter, the Publishing house was a self-financing public publishing house of national significance, enjoying all the rights of a legal entity, and the FOSP was not responsible for its financial activities FOSP. In 1927–1930s, the publishing house sought to be commercially successful. In the 1930s, it submitted to ideological demands and became unprofitable. The ideological dictate and the policy of “prolitarization” led to the fact that in 1931–1932, translation department in the Leningrad branch of FOSP was eliminated and Moscow translation department was eliminated as well. The hithertop unpublished correspondence of the FOSP on the “case of A.K. Vinogradov” as a member of the Moscow section describes circumstances and gives reasons explaining Vinogradov’s refusal to keep translating and his preference of literary criticism and creative writing in the 1930s and 1940s.
topic financing of literature
federation of associations of soviet writers
commercial success
“proletarization
” translation department
editing
censorship
a.k. vinogradov
publishing house
archival publication.
url http://studlit.ru/images/2020-5-4/Moskovskaya_Galtsova.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dariasmoskovskaya fospspublishingpassiononthematerialsheldinthedepartmentofmanuscriptsoftheiwlras
AT elenadgaltsova fospspublishingpassiononthematerialsheldinthedepartmentofmanuscriptsoftheiwlras
_version_ 1724384359815839744