Empiric tuberculosis treatment in South African primary health care facilities - for whom, where, when and why: Implications for the development of tuberculosis diagnostic tests.

The extent and circumstances under which empiric tuberculosis (TB) treatment (treatment without microbiological confirmation at treatment initiation) is administered in primary health care settings in South Africa are not well described.We used data from a pragmatic evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF in wh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kerrigan McCarthy, Katherine Fielding, Gavin J Churchyard, Alison D Grant
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5783417?pdf=render
id doaj-f2985eadf096462896a6649c2e0ec4b0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f2985eadf096462896a6649c2e0ec4b02020-11-24T21:41:27ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01131e019160810.1371/journal.pone.0191608Empiric tuberculosis treatment in South African primary health care facilities - for whom, where, when and why: Implications for the development of tuberculosis diagnostic tests.Kerrigan McCarthyKatherine FieldingGavin J ChurchyardAlison D GrantThe extent and circumstances under which empiric tuberculosis (TB) treatment (treatment without microbiological confirmation at treatment initiation) is administered in primary health care settings in South Africa are not well described.We used data from a pragmatic evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF in which persons undergoing TB investigations by PHC nurses were followed for six months. Following Xpert or smear-microscopy at enrolment, investigations for tuberculosis were undertaken at the discretion of health care workers. We identified persons whose TB treatment was initiated empirically (no microbiological confirmation at time of treatment initiation at a primary health care facility) and describe pathways to treatment initiation.Of 4665 evaluable participants, 541 persons were initiated on treatment of whom 167 (31%) had negative sputum tests at enrolment. Amongst these 167, the median number of participant visits to health care providers prior to treatment initiation was 3 (interquartile range [IQR] 2-4). Chest radiography, sputum culture or hospital referral was done in 106/167 (63%). Reasons for TB treatment start were: 1) empiric (n = 82, 49%); 2) a positive laboratory test (n = 49, 29%); 3) referral and treatment start at a higher level of care (n = 28, 17%); and 4) indeterminable (n = 8, 5%). Empiric treatment accounted for 15% (82/541) of all TB treatment initiations and 1.7% (82/4665) of all persons undergoing TB investigations. Chest radiography findings compatible with TB (63/82 [77%]) were the basis for treatment initiation amongst the majority of empirically treated participants. Microbiological confirmation of TB was subsequently obtained for 11/82 (13%) empirically-treated participants. Median time to empiric treatment start was 3.9 weeks (IQR 1.4-11 weeks) after enrolment.Uncommon prescription of empiric TB treatment with reliance on chest radiography in a nurse-managed programme underscores the need for highly sensitive TB diagnostics suitable for point-of-care, and strong health systems to support TB diagnosis in this setting.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5783417?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kerrigan McCarthy
Katherine Fielding
Gavin J Churchyard
Alison D Grant
spellingShingle Kerrigan McCarthy
Katherine Fielding
Gavin J Churchyard
Alison D Grant
Empiric tuberculosis treatment in South African primary health care facilities - for whom, where, when and why: Implications for the development of tuberculosis diagnostic tests.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Kerrigan McCarthy
Katherine Fielding
Gavin J Churchyard
Alison D Grant
author_sort Kerrigan McCarthy
title Empiric tuberculosis treatment in South African primary health care facilities - for whom, where, when and why: Implications for the development of tuberculosis diagnostic tests.
title_short Empiric tuberculosis treatment in South African primary health care facilities - for whom, where, when and why: Implications for the development of tuberculosis diagnostic tests.
title_full Empiric tuberculosis treatment in South African primary health care facilities - for whom, where, when and why: Implications for the development of tuberculosis diagnostic tests.
title_fullStr Empiric tuberculosis treatment in South African primary health care facilities - for whom, where, when and why: Implications for the development of tuberculosis diagnostic tests.
title_full_unstemmed Empiric tuberculosis treatment in South African primary health care facilities - for whom, where, when and why: Implications for the development of tuberculosis diagnostic tests.
title_sort empiric tuberculosis treatment in south african primary health care facilities - for whom, where, when and why: implications for the development of tuberculosis diagnostic tests.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description The extent and circumstances under which empiric tuberculosis (TB) treatment (treatment without microbiological confirmation at treatment initiation) is administered in primary health care settings in South Africa are not well described.We used data from a pragmatic evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF in which persons undergoing TB investigations by PHC nurses were followed for six months. Following Xpert or smear-microscopy at enrolment, investigations for tuberculosis were undertaken at the discretion of health care workers. We identified persons whose TB treatment was initiated empirically (no microbiological confirmation at time of treatment initiation at a primary health care facility) and describe pathways to treatment initiation.Of 4665 evaluable participants, 541 persons were initiated on treatment of whom 167 (31%) had negative sputum tests at enrolment. Amongst these 167, the median number of participant visits to health care providers prior to treatment initiation was 3 (interquartile range [IQR] 2-4). Chest radiography, sputum culture or hospital referral was done in 106/167 (63%). Reasons for TB treatment start were: 1) empiric (n = 82, 49%); 2) a positive laboratory test (n = 49, 29%); 3) referral and treatment start at a higher level of care (n = 28, 17%); and 4) indeterminable (n = 8, 5%). Empiric treatment accounted for 15% (82/541) of all TB treatment initiations and 1.7% (82/4665) of all persons undergoing TB investigations. Chest radiography findings compatible with TB (63/82 [77%]) were the basis for treatment initiation amongst the majority of empirically treated participants. Microbiological confirmation of TB was subsequently obtained for 11/82 (13%) empirically-treated participants. Median time to empiric treatment start was 3.9 weeks (IQR 1.4-11 weeks) after enrolment.Uncommon prescription of empiric TB treatment with reliance on chest radiography in a nurse-managed programme underscores the need for highly sensitive TB diagnostics suitable for point-of-care, and strong health systems to support TB diagnosis in this setting.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5783417?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT kerriganmccarthy empirictuberculosistreatmentinsouthafricanprimaryhealthcarefacilitiesforwhomwherewhenandwhyimplicationsforthedevelopmentoftuberculosisdiagnostictests
AT katherinefielding empirictuberculosistreatmentinsouthafricanprimaryhealthcarefacilitiesforwhomwherewhenandwhyimplicationsforthedevelopmentoftuberculosisdiagnostictests
AT gavinjchurchyard empirictuberculosistreatmentinsouthafricanprimaryhealthcarefacilitiesforwhomwherewhenandwhyimplicationsforthedevelopmentoftuberculosisdiagnostictests
AT alisondgrant empirictuberculosistreatmentinsouthafricanprimaryhealthcarefacilitiesforwhomwherewhenandwhyimplicationsforthedevelopmentoftuberculosisdiagnostictests
_version_ 1725922060070289408