Konfl ik Internasional Abad ke-21? Benturan Antarnegara Demokrasi dan Masa Depan Politik Dunia

‘The clash of civilizations’ of Samuel Huntington and ‘the end of history’ of Francis Fukuyama are two grand theories that have been widely accepted as the most dominant narratives in post- Cold War international relations. Unfortunately, there have been litt le theoretical developments in today’s w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohamad Rosyidin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Gadjah Mada 2016-09-01
Series:JSP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jsp/article/view/13137
id doaj-f2b01017ecee4a9288428030b812bcf6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f2b01017ecee4a9288428030b812bcf62020-11-24T20:46:18ZengUniversitas Gadjah MadaJSP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik1410-49462502-78832016-09-0118322323610.22146/jsp.131379887Konfl ik Internasional Abad ke-21? Benturan Antarnegara Demokrasi dan Masa Depan Politik DuniaMohamad Rosyidin‘The clash of civilizations’ of Samuel Huntington and ‘the end of history’ of Francis Fukuyama are two grand theories that have been widely accepted as the most dominant narratives in post- Cold War international relations. Unfortunately, there have been litt le theoretical developments in today’s world to predict the future of international confl ict. The theory assumed that the future international confl ict will not occur between democracies and non-democracies as Democratic Peace Theory proposed, but between established democracies and emerging democracies. The established democracies reluctant to share their power with the emerging democracies on how to manage global order. This reluctancy will lead to political frictions and confl icts among them. In spite of its theoretical breakthrough, this theory suff ers of logical inconsistency since it does not distinguish between emerging democracies and emerging powers. Instead of confl ict among democracies, this article argues that international confl icts in the 21 st century will be dominated by asimetrical confl ict between nation-states and radical movements, confl icts due to information openess, and confl ict over natural resources.https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jsp/article/view/13137international confl ictthe clash of democratization theory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohamad Rosyidin
spellingShingle Mohamad Rosyidin
Konfl ik Internasional Abad ke-21? Benturan Antarnegara Demokrasi dan Masa Depan Politik Dunia
JSP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
international confl ict
the clash of democratization theory
author_facet Mohamad Rosyidin
author_sort Mohamad Rosyidin
title Konfl ik Internasional Abad ke-21? Benturan Antarnegara Demokrasi dan Masa Depan Politik Dunia
title_short Konfl ik Internasional Abad ke-21? Benturan Antarnegara Demokrasi dan Masa Depan Politik Dunia
title_full Konfl ik Internasional Abad ke-21? Benturan Antarnegara Demokrasi dan Masa Depan Politik Dunia
title_fullStr Konfl ik Internasional Abad ke-21? Benturan Antarnegara Demokrasi dan Masa Depan Politik Dunia
title_full_unstemmed Konfl ik Internasional Abad ke-21? Benturan Antarnegara Demokrasi dan Masa Depan Politik Dunia
title_sort konfl ik internasional abad ke-21? benturan antarnegara demokrasi dan masa depan politik dunia
publisher Universitas Gadjah Mada
series JSP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik
issn 1410-4946
2502-7883
publishDate 2016-09-01
description ‘The clash of civilizations’ of Samuel Huntington and ‘the end of history’ of Francis Fukuyama are two grand theories that have been widely accepted as the most dominant narratives in post- Cold War international relations. Unfortunately, there have been litt le theoretical developments in today’s world to predict the future of international confl ict. The theory assumed that the future international confl ict will not occur between democracies and non-democracies as Democratic Peace Theory proposed, but between established democracies and emerging democracies. The established democracies reluctant to share their power with the emerging democracies on how to manage global order. This reluctancy will lead to political frictions and confl icts among them. In spite of its theoretical breakthrough, this theory suff ers of logical inconsistency since it does not distinguish between emerging democracies and emerging powers. Instead of confl ict among democracies, this article argues that international confl icts in the 21 st century will be dominated by asimetrical confl ict between nation-states and radical movements, confl icts due to information openess, and confl ict over natural resources.
topic international confl ict
the clash of democratization theory
url https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jsp/article/view/13137
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamadrosyidin konflikinternasionalabadke21benturanantarnegarademokrasidanmasadepanpolitikdunia
_version_ 1716813014502473728