Konfl ik Internasional Abad ke-21? Benturan Antarnegara Demokrasi dan Masa Depan Politik Dunia
‘The clash of civilizations’ of Samuel Huntington and ‘the end of history’ of Francis Fukuyama are two grand theories that have been widely accepted as the most dominant narratives in post- Cold War international relations. Unfortunately, there have been litt le theoretical developments in today’s w...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universitas Gadjah Mada
2016-09-01
|
Series: | JSP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jsp/article/view/13137 |
id |
doaj-f2b01017ecee4a9288428030b812bcf6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f2b01017ecee4a9288428030b812bcf62020-11-24T20:46:18ZengUniversitas Gadjah MadaJSP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik1410-49462502-78832016-09-0118322323610.22146/jsp.131379887Konfl ik Internasional Abad ke-21? Benturan Antarnegara Demokrasi dan Masa Depan Politik DuniaMohamad Rosyidin‘The clash of civilizations’ of Samuel Huntington and ‘the end of history’ of Francis Fukuyama are two grand theories that have been widely accepted as the most dominant narratives in post- Cold War international relations. Unfortunately, there have been litt le theoretical developments in today’s world to predict the future of international confl ict. The theory assumed that the future international confl ict will not occur between democracies and non-democracies as Democratic Peace Theory proposed, but between established democracies and emerging democracies. The established democracies reluctant to share their power with the emerging democracies on how to manage global order. This reluctancy will lead to political frictions and confl icts among them. In spite of its theoretical breakthrough, this theory suff ers of logical inconsistency since it does not distinguish between emerging democracies and emerging powers. Instead of confl ict among democracies, this article argues that international confl icts in the 21 st century will be dominated by asimetrical confl ict between nation-states and radical movements, confl icts due to information openess, and confl ict over natural resources.https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jsp/article/view/13137international confl ictthe clash of democratization theory |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mohamad Rosyidin |
spellingShingle |
Mohamad Rosyidin Konfl ik Internasional Abad ke-21? Benturan Antarnegara Demokrasi dan Masa Depan Politik Dunia JSP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik international confl ict the clash of democratization theory |
author_facet |
Mohamad Rosyidin |
author_sort |
Mohamad Rosyidin |
title |
Konfl ik Internasional Abad ke-21? Benturan Antarnegara Demokrasi dan Masa Depan Politik Dunia |
title_short |
Konfl ik Internasional Abad ke-21? Benturan Antarnegara Demokrasi dan Masa Depan Politik Dunia |
title_full |
Konfl ik Internasional Abad ke-21? Benturan Antarnegara Demokrasi dan Masa Depan Politik Dunia |
title_fullStr |
Konfl ik Internasional Abad ke-21? Benturan Antarnegara Demokrasi dan Masa Depan Politik Dunia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Konfl ik Internasional Abad ke-21? Benturan Antarnegara Demokrasi dan Masa Depan Politik Dunia |
title_sort |
konfl ik internasional abad ke-21? benturan antarnegara demokrasi dan masa depan politik dunia |
publisher |
Universitas Gadjah Mada |
series |
JSP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik |
issn |
1410-4946 2502-7883 |
publishDate |
2016-09-01 |
description |
‘The clash of civilizations’ of Samuel Huntington and ‘the end of history’ of Francis Fukuyama are two grand
theories that have been widely accepted as the most dominant narratives in post- Cold War international
relations. Unfortunately, there have been litt le theoretical developments in today’s world to predict the
future of international confl ict. The theory assumed that the future international confl ict will not occur
between democracies and non-democracies as Democratic Peace Theory proposed, but between established
democracies and emerging democracies. The established democracies reluctant to share their power with the
emerging democracies on how to manage global order. This reluctancy will lead to political frictions and
confl icts among them. In spite of its theoretical breakthrough, this theory suff ers of logical inconsistency
since it does not distinguish between emerging democracies and emerging powers. Instead of confl ict
among democracies, this article argues that international confl icts in the 21
st
century will be dominated
by asimetrical confl ict between nation-states and radical movements, confl icts due to information openess,
and confl ict over natural resources. |
topic |
international confl ict the clash of democratization theory |
url |
https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jsp/article/view/13137 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mohamadrosyidin konflikinternasionalabadke21benturanantarnegarademokrasidanmasadepanpolitikdunia |
_version_ |
1716813014502473728 |