Comparison of the Clinical Effects of Paclitaxel and Paclitaxel plus Oxaliplatin as the Second-line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Background and objective Second-line chemotherapy with taxanes for the patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who had disease recurrence or failure in previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, has been shown to be effective. Besides docetaxel, paclitaxel, the other available ta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tianqing CHU, Hao LIN, Jie SHEN, Runbo ZHONG, Baohui HAN
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Chinese Anti-Cancer Association; Chinese Antituberculosis Association 2009-11-01
Series:Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.lungca.org/index.php?journal=01&page=article&op=viewFile&path[]=10.3779%2Fj.issn.1009-3419.2009.11.10&path[]=119
id doaj-f2c538edc86641c08565fdfc8bbc31da
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f2c538edc86641c08565fdfc8bbc31da2020-11-24T22:44:47ZzhoChinese Anti-Cancer Association; Chinese Antituberculosis AssociationChinese Journal of Lung Cancer1009-34191999-61872009-11-01121111781183Comparison of the Clinical Effects of Paclitaxel and Paclitaxel plus Oxaliplatin as the Second-line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung CancerTianqing CHUHao LINJie SHENRunbo ZHONGBaohui HANBackground and objective Second-line chemotherapy with taxanes for the patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who had disease recurrence or failure in previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, has been shown to be effective. Besides docetaxel, paclitaxel, the other available taxane, has also demonstrated potential activity in the same indication in a few studies. The aim of this study is to compare the treatment efficacy and safety between paclitaxel and paclitaxel plus oxaliplatin as the second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. Methods Sixty-six patients from Sep 2000 to Sep 2007 whose disease progressed after first-line chemotherapy were enrolled and randomized into 2 groups: one group was administered with only paclitaxel (44 patients), the other was given paclitaxel plus oxaliplatin (22 patients), ECOG 0-2. The regiments were: single agent paclitaxel (175 mg/m2, d1) or paclitaxel (175 mg/m2, d1) plus oxaliplatin(130 mg/m2, d1), 3-4 weeks/cycle. Results The overall response rate of single paclitaxel and paclitaxel plus oxaliplatin were 13.6% and 18.2%, respectively. The median time to progression were 3.2 months vs 4.5 months. Median survival time were 6.9 months vs 8.2 months. There were no statistical differences. The haematological toxicities of paclitaxel plus oxaliplatin group were more severe than single agent group: grade 3/4 leukopenia (P=0.039). The rate of nausea, vomiting and acroaesthesia in paclitaxel plus oxaliplatin group was higher than that of single-paclitaxel group, but there were no statistical differences. Other adverse effects were mild. Conclusion Singlepaclitaxel administration as the second-lined treatment of advanced NSCLC is tolerable and has the response effect no worse than the combined chemotherapy.http://www.lungca.org/index.php?journal=01&page=article&op=viewFile&path[]=10.3779%2Fj.issn.1009-3419.2009.11.10&path[]=119Lung neoplasmsSecond-line chemotherapyPaclitaxelOxaliplati
collection DOAJ
language zho
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tianqing CHU
Hao LIN
Jie SHEN
Runbo ZHONG
Baohui HAN
spellingShingle Tianqing CHU
Hao LIN
Jie SHEN
Runbo ZHONG
Baohui HAN
Comparison of the Clinical Effects of Paclitaxel and Paclitaxel plus Oxaliplatin as the Second-line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer
Lung neoplasms
Second-line chemotherapy
Paclitaxel
Oxaliplati
author_facet Tianqing CHU
Hao LIN
Jie SHEN
Runbo ZHONG
Baohui HAN
author_sort Tianqing CHU
title Comparison of the Clinical Effects of Paclitaxel and Paclitaxel plus Oxaliplatin as the Second-line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
title_short Comparison of the Clinical Effects of Paclitaxel and Paclitaxel plus Oxaliplatin as the Second-line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
title_full Comparison of the Clinical Effects of Paclitaxel and Paclitaxel plus Oxaliplatin as the Second-line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
title_fullStr Comparison of the Clinical Effects of Paclitaxel and Paclitaxel plus Oxaliplatin as the Second-line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Clinical Effects of Paclitaxel and Paclitaxel plus Oxaliplatin as the Second-line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
title_sort comparison of the clinical effects of paclitaxel and paclitaxel plus oxaliplatin as the second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer
publisher Chinese Anti-Cancer Association; Chinese Antituberculosis Association
series Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer
issn 1009-3419
1999-6187
publishDate 2009-11-01
description Background and objective Second-line chemotherapy with taxanes for the patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who had disease recurrence or failure in previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, has been shown to be effective. Besides docetaxel, paclitaxel, the other available taxane, has also demonstrated potential activity in the same indication in a few studies. The aim of this study is to compare the treatment efficacy and safety between paclitaxel and paclitaxel plus oxaliplatin as the second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. Methods Sixty-six patients from Sep 2000 to Sep 2007 whose disease progressed after first-line chemotherapy were enrolled and randomized into 2 groups: one group was administered with only paclitaxel (44 patients), the other was given paclitaxel plus oxaliplatin (22 patients), ECOG 0-2. The regiments were: single agent paclitaxel (175 mg/m2, d1) or paclitaxel (175 mg/m2, d1) plus oxaliplatin(130 mg/m2, d1), 3-4 weeks/cycle. Results The overall response rate of single paclitaxel and paclitaxel plus oxaliplatin were 13.6% and 18.2%, respectively. The median time to progression were 3.2 months vs 4.5 months. Median survival time were 6.9 months vs 8.2 months. There were no statistical differences. The haematological toxicities of paclitaxel plus oxaliplatin group were more severe than single agent group: grade 3/4 leukopenia (P=0.039). The rate of nausea, vomiting and acroaesthesia in paclitaxel plus oxaliplatin group was higher than that of single-paclitaxel group, but there were no statistical differences. Other adverse effects were mild. Conclusion Singlepaclitaxel administration as the second-lined treatment of advanced NSCLC is tolerable and has the response effect no worse than the combined chemotherapy.
topic Lung neoplasms
Second-line chemotherapy
Paclitaxel
Oxaliplati
url http://www.lungca.org/index.php?journal=01&page=article&op=viewFile&path[]=10.3779%2Fj.issn.1009-3419.2009.11.10&path[]=119
work_keys_str_mv AT tianqingchu comparisonoftheclinicaleffectsofpaclitaxelandpaclitaxelplusoxaliplatinasthesecondlinetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT haolin comparisonoftheclinicaleffectsofpaclitaxelandpaclitaxelplusoxaliplatinasthesecondlinetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT jieshen comparisonoftheclinicaleffectsofpaclitaxelandpaclitaxelplusoxaliplatinasthesecondlinetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT runbozhong comparisonoftheclinicaleffectsofpaclitaxelandpaclitaxelplusoxaliplatinasthesecondlinetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
AT baohuihan comparisonoftheclinicaleffectsofpaclitaxelandpaclitaxelplusoxaliplatinasthesecondlinetreatmentofadvancednonsmallcelllungcancer
_version_ 1725690415112257536