Ceilometer lidar comparison: backscatter coefficient retrieval and signal-to-noise ratio determination

The potential of a new generation of ceilometer instruments for aerosol monitoring has been studied in the Ceilometer Lidar Comparison (CLIC) study. The used ceilometer was developed by Jenoptik, Germany, and is designed to find both thin cirrus clouds at tropopause level and aerosol layers at close...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. Heese, H. Flentje, D. Althausen, A. Ansmann, S. Frey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2010-12-01
Series:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Online Access:http://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/3/1763/2010/amt-3-1763-2010.pdf
id doaj-f2dd0127cbb84660a905681b8177ea0d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f2dd0127cbb84660a905681b8177ea0d2020-11-24T21:36:57ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Measurement Techniques1867-13811867-85482010-12-01361763177010.5194/amt-3-1763-2010Ceilometer lidar comparison: backscatter coefficient retrieval and signal-to-noise ratio determinationB. HeeseH. FlentjeD. AlthausenA. AnsmannS. FreyThe potential of a new generation of ceilometer instruments for aerosol monitoring has been studied in the Ceilometer Lidar Comparison (CLIC) study. The used ceilometer was developed by Jenoptik, Germany, and is designed to find both thin cirrus clouds at tropopause level and aerosol layers at close ranges during day and night-time. The comparison study was performed to determine up to which altitude the ceilometers are capable to deliver particle backscatter coefficient profiles. For this, the derived ceilometer profiles are compared to simultaneously measured lidar profiles at the same wavelength. The lidar used for the comparison was the multi-wavelengths Raman lidar Polly<sup>XT</sup>. To demonstrate the capabilities and limits of ceilometers for the derivation of particle backscatter coefficient profiles from their measurements two examples of the comparison results are shown. Two cases, a daytime case with high background noise and a less noisy night-time case, are chosen. In both cases the ceilometer profiles compare well with the lidar profiles in atmospheric structures like aerosol layers or the boundary layer top height. However, the determination of the correct magnitude of the particle backscatter coefficient needs a calibration of the ceilometer data with an independent measurement of the aerosol optical depth by a sun photometer. To characterizes the ceilometers signal performance with increasing altitude a comprehensive signal-to-noise ratio study was performed. During daytime the signal-to-noise ratio is higher than 1 up to 4–5 km depending on the aerosol content. In our night-time case the SNR is higher than 1 even up to 8.5 km, so that also aerosol layers in the upper troposphere had been detected by the ceilometer. http://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/3/1763/2010/amt-3-1763-2010.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author B. Heese
H. Flentje
D. Althausen
A. Ansmann
S. Frey
spellingShingle B. Heese
H. Flentje
D. Althausen
A. Ansmann
S. Frey
Ceilometer lidar comparison: backscatter coefficient retrieval and signal-to-noise ratio determination
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
author_facet B. Heese
H. Flentje
D. Althausen
A. Ansmann
S. Frey
author_sort B. Heese
title Ceilometer lidar comparison: backscatter coefficient retrieval and signal-to-noise ratio determination
title_short Ceilometer lidar comparison: backscatter coefficient retrieval and signal-to-noise ratio determination
title_full Ceilometer lidar comparison: backscatter coefficient retrieval and signal-to-noise ratio determination
title_fullStr Ceilometer lidar comparison: backscatter coefficient retrieval and signal-to-noise ratio determination
title_full_unstemmed Ceilometer lidar comparison: backscatter coefficient retrieval and signal-to-noise ratio determination
title_sort ceilometer lidar comparison: backscatter coefficient retrieval and signal-to-noise ratio determination
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
issn 1867-1381
1867-8548
publishDate 2010-12-01
description The potential of a new generation of ceilometer instruments for aerosol monitoring has been studied in the Ceilometer Lidar Comparison (CLIC) study. The used ceilometer was developed by Jenoptik, Germany, and is designed to find both thin cirrus clouds at tropopause level and aerosol layers at close ranges during day and night-time. The comparison study was performed to determine up to which altitude the ceilometers are capable to deliver particle backscatter coefficient profiles. For this, the derived ceilometer profiles are compared to simultaneously measured lidar profiles at the same wavelength. The lidar used for the comparison was the multi-wavelengths Raman lidar Polly<sup>XT</sup>. To demonstrate the capabilities and limits of ceilometers for the derivation of particle backscatter coefficient profiles from their measurements two examples of the comparison results are shown. Two cases, a daytime case with high background noise and a less noisy night-time case, are chosen. In both cases the ceilometer profiles compare well with the lidar profiles in atmospheric structures like aerosol layers or the boundary layer top height. However, the determination of the correct magnitude of the particle backscatter coefficient needs a calibration of the ceilometer data with an independent measurement of the aerosol optical depth by a sun photometer. To characterizes the ceilometers signal performance with increasing altitude a comprehensive signal-to-noise ratio study was performed. During daytime the signal-to-noise ratio is higher than 1 up to 4–5 km depending on the aerosol content. In our night-time case the SNR is higher than 1 even up to 8.5 km, so that also aerosol layers in the upper troposphere had been detected by the ceilometer.
url http://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/3/1763/2010/amt-3-1763-2010.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bheese ceilometerlidarcomparisonbackscattercoefficientretrievalandsignaltonoiseratiodetermination
AT hflentje ceilometerlidarcomparisonbackscattercoefficientretrievalandsignaltonoiseratiodetermination
AT dalthausen ceilometerlidarcomparisonbackscattercoefficientretrievalandsignaltonoiseratiodetermination
AT aansmann ceilometerlidarcomparisonbackscattercoefficientretrievalandsignaltonoiseratiodetermination
AT sfrey ceilometerlidarcomparisonbackscattercoefficientretrievalandsignaltonoiseratiodetermination
_version_ 1725938974171594752