Orofacial Soft Tissue Reconstruction with Locoregional Flaps in a Health Resource-Depleted Environment: Experiences from Nigeria

BackgroundReconstruction of orofacial soft tissue defects is often challenging due to functional and aesthetic demands. Despite advances in orofacial soft tissue defect reconstruction using free flaps, locoregional flaps still remain an important option, especially in health resource-depleted enviro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rowland Agbara, Athanasius Chukwudi Obiadazie, Benjamin Fomete, Kelvin Uchenna Omeje
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2016-05-01
Series:Archives of Plastic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-43-265.pdf
id doaj-f2ef023bbe5544beb027394ce07181ad
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f2ef023bbe5544beb027394ce07181ad2020-11-25T01:33:42ZengKorean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeonsArchives of Plastic Surgery2234-61632234-61712016-05-0143326527110.5999/aps.2016.43.3.265669Orofacial Soft Tissue Reconstruction with Locoregional Flaps in a Health Resource-Depleted Environment: Experiences from NigeriaRowland Agbara0Athanasius Chukwudi Obiadazie1Benjamin Fomete2Kelvin Uchenna Omeje3Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos, Nigeria.Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Shika-Zaria, Nigeria.Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Shika-Zaria, Nigeria.Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano State, Nigeria.BackgroundReconstruction of orofacial soft tissue defects is often challenging due to functional and aesthetic demands. Despite advances in orofacial soft tissue defect reconstruction using free flaps, locoregional flaps still remain an important option, especially in health resource-depleted environments. This retrospective study highlights our experiences in oral and maxillofacial soft tissue reconstruction using locoregional flaps.MethodsA twenty-three years retrospective analysis of all patients managed in our department was undertaken. Information was sourced from patients' case notes and operating theater records. Data was analyzed using SPSS ver. 16 (SPSS Inc.) and Microsoft Excel 2007 (Microsoft).ResultsA total of 77 patients underwent orofacial soft tissue defect reconstruction within the years reviewed. Males accounted for 55 (71.4%) cases and trauma was the main etiological factor in 45 (58.4%) of the patients treated. When sites of defect were considered, the lip, 27 (32.1%), was the most frequent site followed by the nose, 17 (20.2%). Forehead flap, 51 (59.3%), was the most commonly used flap. Complications noted were tumor recurrences at the recipient bed in 3 (3.9%) cases, tumor occurrence at the donor site in 1 (1.3%) case and postoperative infection in 11 (14.3%) cases.ConclusionsLocoregional flaps still have an important role in the rehabilitation of patients with orofacial soft tissue defects. They remain a vital tool in the armamentarium of the reconstructive surgeon, especially in health resource-depleted environments where advanced reconstructive techniques may not be feasible.http://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-43-265.pdfHealth resourcesSoft tissue injuriesFaceSurgical flaps
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rowland Agbara
Athanasius Chukwudi Obiadazie
Benjamin Fomete
Kelvin Uchenna Omeje
spellingShingle Rowland Agbara
Athanasius Chukwudi Obiadazie
Benjamin Fomete
Kelvin Uchenna Omeje
Orofacial Soft Tissue Reconstruction with Locoregional Flaps in a Health Resource-Depleted Environment: Experiences from Nigeria
Archives of Plastic Surgery
Health resources
Soft tissue injuries
Face
Surgical flaps
author_facet Rowland Agbara
Athanasius Chukwudi Obiadazie
Benjamin Fomete
Kelvin Uchenna Omeje
author_sort Rowland Agbara
title Orofacial Soft Tissue Reconstruction with Locoregional Flaps in a Health Resource-Depleted Environment: Experiences from Nigeria
title_short Orofacial Soft Tissue Reconstruction with Locoregional Flaps in a Health Resource-Depleted Environment: Experiences from Nigeria
title_full Orofacial Soft Tissue Reconstruction with Locoregional Flaps in a Health Resource-Depleted Environment: Experiences from Nigeria
title_fullStr Orofacial Soft Tissue Reconstruction with Locoregional Flaps in a Health Resource-Depleted Environment: Experiences from Nigeria
title_full_unstemmed Orofacial Soft Tissue Reconstruction with Locoregional Flaps in a Health Resource-Depleted Environment: Experiences from Nigeria
title_sort orofacial soft tissue reconstruction with locoregional flaps in a health resource-depleted environment: experiences from nigeria
publisher Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
series Archives of Plastic Surgery
issn 2234-6163
2234-6171
publishDate 2016-05-01
description BackgroundReconstruction of orofacial soft tissue defects is often challenging due to functional and aesthetic demands. Despite advances in orofacial soft tissue defect reconstruction using free flaps, locoregional flaps still remain an important option, especially in health resource-depleted environments. This retrospective study highlights our experiences in oral and maxillofacial soft tissue reconstruction using locoregional flaps.MethodsA twenty-three years retrospective analysis of all patients managed in our department was undertaken. Information was sourced from patients' case notes and operating theater records. Data was analyzed using SPSS ver. 16 (SPSS Inc.) and Microsoft Excel 2007 (Microsoft).ResultsA total of 77 patients underwent orofacial soft tissue defect reconstruction within the years reviewed. Males accounted for 55 (71.4%) cases and trauma was the main etiological factor in 45 (58.4%) of the patients treated. When sites of defect were considered, the lip, 27 (32.1%), was the most frequent site followed by the nose, 17 (20.2%). Forehead flap, 51 (59.3%), was the most commonly used flap. Complications noted were tumor recurrences at the recipient bed in 3 (3.9%) cases, tumor occurrence at the donor site in 1 (1.3%) case and postoperative infection in 11 (14.3%) cases.ConclusionsLocoregional flaps still have an important role in the rehabilitation of patients with orofacial soft tissue defects. They remain a vital tool in the armamentarium of the reconstructive surgeon, especially in health resource-depleted environments where advanced reconstructive techniques may not be feasible.
topic Health resources
Soft tissue injuries
Face
Surgical flaps
url http://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-43-265.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rowlandagbara orofacialsofttissuereconstructionwithlocoregionalflapsinahealthresourcedepletedenvironmentexperiencesfromnigeria
AT athanasiuschukwudiobiadazie orofacialsofttissuereconstructionwithlocoregionalflapsinahealthresourcedepletedenvironmentexperiencesfromnigeria
AT benjaminfomete orofacialsofttissuereconstructionwithlocoregionalflapsinahealthresourcedepletedenvironmentexperiencesfromnigeria
AT kelvinuchennaomeje orofacialsofttissuereconstructionwithlocoregionalflapsinahealthresourcedepletedenvironmentexperiencesfromnigeria
_version_ 1725076340872314880