Evaluating Plantation Forest vs. Natural Forest Regeneration for Biodiversity Enhancement in Hong Kong

Global trends predict a continuous increase in the proportion of forest occupied by plantations up to the end of the 21st century, while a dramatic loss of biodiversity is foreseen as a result of anthropogenic exploitation and climate change. This study compares the role and performance of plantatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Janet E. Nichol, Sawaid Abbas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/5/593
id doaj-f2f002a234684c4aaa1f72898b58e689
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f2f002a234684c4aaa1f72898b58e6892021-05-31T23:32:15ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072021-05-011259359310.3390/f12050593Evaluating Plantation Forest vs. Natural Forest Regeneration for Biodiversity Enhancement in Hong KongJanet E. Nichol0Sawaid Abbas1Department of Geography, School of Global Studies, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9SJ, UKDepartment of Land Surveying and Geo-Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 11 Yuk Choi Rd, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong 100077, ChinaGlobal trends predict a continuous increase in the proportion of forest occupied by plantations up to the end of the 21st century, while a dramatic loss of biodiversity is foreseen as a result of anthropogenic exploitation and climate change. This study compares the role and performance of plantation policies in Hong Kong, with natural regeneration of secondary forest, using detailed spatio-temporal data extracted from a previous study. The study extends over a 70-year period from 1945 to 2014 using aerial photographs and satellite images of five time periods to document spatio-temporal trends in plantation forestry and natural forest succession. Field data on species richness and woody biomass at different stages of forest succession are compared with available data from plantations in the same study area. Results indicate that plantation forests support relatively few native species in the understory, with much lower species richness than naturally regenerated forest, even after 6 to 7 decades. Time-sequential maps of habitat change show that natural forest succession from barren grassy hillsides, progressed at an annual rate of 7.8%, from only 0.2% of the landscape post WWII, to over 37% today. Plantation forestry on the other hand has been less successful, and has even acted as a barrier to natural forest regeneration, as mono-cultural plantations from the late 1960s to 1980s are still plantations today, whereas other similar areas have succeeded naturally to forest. The theory of plantations acting as a nurse crop for a woody native understory is not supported, as <i>Pinus massoniana</i> plantations, destroyed by two deadly nematodes during the 1970s, apparently had no woody understory, as they were seen to have reverted to grassland in 1989 and are still mainly grassland today.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/5/593plantationsbiodiversitysecondary forestHong Kong
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Janet E. Nichol
Sawaid Abbas
spellingShingle Janet E. Nichol
Sawaid Abbas
Evaluating Plantation Forest vs. Natural Forest Regeneration for Biodiversity Enhancement in Hong Kong
Forests
plantations
biodiversity
secondary forest
Hong Kong
author_facet Janet E. Nichol
Sawaid Abbas
author_sort Janet E. Nichol
title Evaluating Plantation Forest vs. Natural Forest Regeneration for Biodiversity Enhancement in Hong Kong
title_short Evaluating Plantation Forest vs. Natural Forest Regeneration for Biodiversity Enhancement in Hong Kong
title_full Evaluating Plantation Forest vs. Natural Forest Regeneration for Biodiversity Enhancement in Hong Kong
title_fullStr Evaluating Plantation Forest vs. Natural Forest Regeneration for Biodiversity Enhancement in Hong Kong
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Plantation Forest vs. Natural Forest Regeneration for Biodiversity Enhancement in Hong Kong
title_sort evaluating plantation forest vs. natural forest regeneration for biodiversity enhancement in hong kong
publisher MDPI AG
series Forests
issn 1999-4907
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Global trends predict a continuous increase in the proportion of forest occupied by plantations up to the end of the 21st century, while a dramatic loss of biodiversity is foreseen as a result of anthropogenic exploitation and climate change. This study compares the role and performance of plantation policies in Hong Kong, with natural regeneration of secondary forest, using detailed spatio-temporal data extracted from a previous study. The study extends over a 70-year period from 1945 to 2014 using aerial photographs and satellite images of five time periods to document spatio-temporal trends in plantation forestry and natural forest succession. Field data on species richness and woody biomass at different stages of forest succession are compared with available data from plantations in the same study area. Results indicate that plantation forests support relatively few native species in the understory, with much lower species richness than naturally regenerated forest, even after 6 to 7 decades. Time-sequential maps of habitat change show that natural forest succession from barren grassy hillsides, progressed at an annual rate of 7.8%, from only 0.2% of the landscape post WWII, to over 37% today. Plantation forestry on the other hand has been less successful, and has even acted as a barrier to natural forest regeneration, as mono-cultural plantations from the late 1960s to 1980s are still plantations today, whereas other similar areas have succeeded naturally to forest. The theory of plantations acting as a nurse crop for a woody native understory is not supported, as <i>Pinus massoniana</i> plantations, destroyed by two deadly nematodes during the 1970s, apparently had no woody understory, as they were seen to have reverted to grassland in 1989 and are still mainly grassland today.
topic plantations
biodiversity
secondary forest
Hong Kong
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/5/593
work_keys_str_mv AT janetenichol evaluatingplantationforestvsnaturalforestregenerationforbiodiversityenhancementinhongkong
AT sawaidabbas evaluatingplantationforestvsnaturalforestregenerationforbiodiversityenhancementinhongkong
_version_ 1721417346774466560